El Town Council está realizando un taller para discutir metas y prioridades presupuestarias futuras. La discusión incluye análisis de impactos legislativos de HB 1329 y HJR 1F.
📹 Del video · 51m
Transcrito automáticamente del video oficial de la reunión (voz a texto — puede contener errores).
Good evening, everyone.
Today is Wednesday, June 17, 2026, 5 p.m.
We are having our Town Council workshop on our budget.
With that, Mr. Clerk, if you could please take the roll.
Council Member Ramirez?
Here.
Council Member Lord?
Here.
Council Member Duncan?
Here.
Vice Mayor Callahan?
Here.
Mayor, Mayor Bud.
Present.
We have a quorum.
Thank you.
Please join in, rise, for the Pledge of Allegiance.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
All right, Ralph, I'll let you go ahead and take over from here.
Thank you, Mayor, members of Council.
Thank you for attending today's budget visiting workshop.
I know it's 5 o'clock, and then we have a council meeting right after.
So we have, as we normally do, this is our first budget visiting workshop, and particularly this year, there's a lot of different changes that we know are upcoming in the state.
So with that, if we could have the town clerk, please put the powerpoint up, please.
We'll try to get through this within the specified hour, Mayor.
So thank you.
So again, today's our first budget visiting workshop.
A couple of things.
Let me make sure I got the clicker on.
Is it working?
Okay.
Okay.
So first budget work, budget visiting workshop is tonight.
We're going to have our second one.
It will be on Thursday, July 30th.
Our third one will be on August the 31st.
Then we'll also have our hearings.
Tentatively, we have our first budget hearing Thursday, September the 10th.
Our second budget hearing will be Thursday, September the 24th.
Again, these are subject to Miami County Board of County Commissioners and Miami County School Board agendas that are out.
Once we make sure that we don't conflict with any of those meetings.
So there you see Mayor and Members of Council will have at least five opportunities to have an open public discussion regarding our budget.
And you'll start getting the figures on the July 30th meeting as well.
Again, the location, the time is 6 o'clock and the location will be the council chambers.
Just a little quick recap.
As you know, we had our townwide property values and you can see 2006.
You see our property values still going at a nice, good, steady increase.
Last year...
Let me see.
Maybe I click on it.
I might...
There we go.
Did I click too fast, guys?
Okay.
Last year was a 4.3% increase in our property values.
The millage rate for the last 10 years, we've been steady.
For the last 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years, we're going to go in there with the mindset of keeping it flat at 2.8332.
So we'll start building our budget around that number.
This just gives you a recap of the 2025 adopted millage rates throughout Miami-Dade County.
We are still the ninth lowest in the county at $2.8332 per thousand.
Our fund balance continues to be strong.
We have our 2025, again, it's unaudited, but we should be finishing up the audit here in the next couple of weeks here.
It's at $27.7 million.
So, again, strong financial unrestricted balance there.
Now, we do know that we had a plan dip for Legacy Park.
We had the resolution authorizing the $12.8 million worth of soil remediation.
The funding source that we identified was American Rescue Plan, as we refer to it as ARPA.
We used $6.5 million of the ARPA.
And then we also committed, last year, unrestricted reserves.
We call it our fund balance of the remaining $6.3 million for a total project of 12.8.
Why is that relevant?
Because one of the things that we're doing is also making sure that we get maximum amount of our voluntary cleanup tax credits for the eligible brownfield credits, as we call it, for Legacy Park.
This provides you a quick summary.
Even back from 2021, we were able to capture the entire $58,000, $22,000, $260,000, $23,000, $113,000, $24,000, $94,000.
Last year, the reason why that has an asterisk is because we actually expended over $2.2 million worth of eligible expenses there in terms of what we felt was a lot of the soil remediation that we did there.
But we can only go up to $1 million.
But we were able to capture the entire million dollars.
What that means is that the tax credit amount that we had received on the other column there equates to 50% of our expenses.
So last year, although we spent way beyond the $1 million, we were able to at least capture the entire amount.
But 50% of it, the $500,000, you'll see here later this year where we sell those tax proceeds.
We have an agreement with Publix next door to sell those at $0.90 on a dollar.
So we'll start recouping all that, all those funds there.
Why is that relevant?
Because in 2025, we also had what we call the cost of living adjustments resolution.
One of the highlights there that we worked hard with the council in many meetings was identifying that no cost of living adjustments will be provided to town employees if the town's most recently audited annual comprehensive financial report reflects a negative net change in the fund balance in general fund unless approved by town council.
So what's that mean for us?
Our projected, we do have a projected deficit.
We had solar remediation costs was funded by unrestricted reserves last year because it's fiscal years, right?
We expended $4.1 million from our reserves for Legacy Park Reserves for Legacy Park Solar Remediation Project.
Our projected deficit on pending audit in the next couple of weeks, but give or take a couple dollars there, believe it or not, it's about $988,000.
If it wasn't for the solar remediation, we would be in the plus by $3.2 million.
So again, we knew going in that we were going to be using those unrestricted funds.
We know we were going to be capturing it.
If it wasn't for just those funds, we would actually be in the plus over $3 million.
Now, the COLA for next year, as you see that we have, we use the consumer price index for all urban consumer prices for the Miami, for a lot of the greater Palm Beach area.
We go through that annual column.
We use the last two years, which calculates to 2.6% COLA.
That is the Miami for a lot of the greater area.
What's that mean?
2.6%.
Potential fiscal impact for a 26-27 budget.
It's $123,000, 506.
The reason why I bring that up, Mayor and Members of the Council, because at this point, we'll just need some guidance from the Council.
I mean, we know that the resolution says that there are any type of extraordinary expenses that we know, and there is a deficit, $988,000, some change.
And we know that the COLA for next year is 2.6%.
We know the budget impact is approximately $123,000.
So at this point, I'll pause for a second and just have the discussion, just to get that guidance from the Council.
I'll open it up.
Vice Mayor Callahan, you're right.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Yeah, I was really the one that was working hard on revising this and really to protect the reserves.
That's not what happened to us when I was first on the Council, where we were consistently digging into our reserves to meet budgetary numbers.
And there was just a lot of issues back then that have been corrected.
The way I see it is that I don't feel that we should hold the staff responsible for something that was unforeseen.
This was, I mean, again, like you just stated, right?
If we weren't building Legacy Park, if we didn't have solar remediation, we'd be putting $3 million in.
And on this particular case, I don't, this is something that was unforeseen to any of us until we got into the midst of the project.
I mean, I would certainly be in favor of moving forward with the 2.6% COLA.
Any other comments?
No?
I agree.
I would be in agreement.
Council Member Mayor, you're recognized.
Okay, so the total then ends up being $1.1 million overall.
The $9.88 that we're short plus the $1.23 if we approve that.
So we're looking at about $1.1 million.
No, no, no.
Sorry.
Okay, so for the-
Council Member, the $9.88 is what we know is going to be the end result of our annual audit, give or take a couple dollars, right?
Going into next year's budget, going into next year's budget, that $1.20 is going to be rolled into that budget.
And I'll have a little further discussion about what our plans are for next year's budget as well.
I'm not against going forward with that.
You know, you're right.
They shouldn't be held responsible for something that was unforeseen.
But would it be more prudent to find out what's going to happen with the homestead tax situation and how that affects us?
I mean, I don't know what our total numbers are.
I think that's a-
That's the lecture too, isn't it?
Yeah, I mean, I think we'll kind of get into that.
We're talking about $120.
And again, right now we're just-
I'm going to agree with the Vice Mayor on that.
When we put this before, remember our discussion, it was like for things that happened to us, right?
And this isn't something that happened to us.
This is something that we decided to do to remediate an environmental condition.
And again, so do we really want to hold our employees accountable for something we decided to do instead of something that happened to us?
And I'm in agreement with the Vice Mayor on it.
You know, it should not be on their back solely.
And Councilor Meyers, you must be looking at my presentation, but we're going to get into that in a second.
So, you know, further along, but again, thank you.
All right.
So, you know, the ordinance requires that we take-
Council take action on that call.
So, I don't know if it's an ordinance or just a-
Or a resolution.
Since this is a workshop, I think you can only-
You can only direct staff to move forward with a particular policy.
And then if you want to do it formally by resolution, that can be done as part of the-
It can just be part of the resolution adopting the budget.
Ralph, let's go ahead and we'll do that.
We have consensus up here unless anybody disagrees.
Then we'll go ahead and-
And resolution.
Yeah.
And-
And-
And Mayor, Council, thank you.
And Vice Mayor, particularly yourself.
Because this was the safeguard that we created.
So, this was exactly what we envisioned when we were going through that.
Having this open discussion.
Finding out what the extraordinary event is.
We already knew what it was.
We committed back last year.
And then we had this discussion.
To me, I love this interaction because that's what the resolution was meant to do.
So, thank you, Mayor and Mayor, Council.
We will proceed with that 2.6.
And now we're going to get more into my presentation.
Okay.
So, next year we have some key projects.
Some of the key projects that we have are finalizing upgrade for the software program.
That's being funded by ARPA.
General Fund, Avalorum.
We do have a joint use agreement that we're still finalizing negotiations with Miami County
School Board to use the fields at Cutler Bay Senior and Middle Schools.
We're getting really close.
We actually have one of our final meetings there.
But we already know that it's going to be built into the budget next year for, it's called, you know,
almost $42,000 worth of fencing that needs to be done there.
But we do gain, again, six acres at Cutler Bay Senior High, four basketball courts, two tennis courts, Cutler Bay Middle, 11.5 acres, and six basketball courts.
So, I think it's a great price for what we're going to be gaining for the public use.
Additional incentives.
Obviously, we're going to finalize and negotiate with Miami County EO on Coastal Ridge Preserve.
We are going through, we just got the results for our solar remediation.
There are some hotspots that we knew about.
So, we're getting that pricing together.
So, I could make that presentation to the council.
Also, commence our five-year strategic planning process.
Hopefully, there we can team up with local universities there to kind of offset those costs there.
Parks and Recreation Department, we funded through FDEP.
We have finalized the Cutler Bay Wetlands at 53 acres off of 97th Avenue 224.
We're also seeking funding for the Coastal Ridge Preserve.
Now that we know that it's not designated a brownfield, we were very successful in doing that in Veterans Park.
That we received a grant from FDEP for FDEP and their country to clean it up.
We're going to probably use the same path with Coastal Ridge Preserve because there are some hotspots there.
But it's not enough to justify the expense of creating a brownfield like we did with Blue Herring Park.
Commence the restoration on Coastal Ridge Preserve.
The $250,000 we received in collaboration with Commissioner Cohen Higgins' office.
And then we also have the soil remediation at Blue Herring Park to finalize that project too.
And that has a brownfield implications there as well.
And then, last but not least, commenced demolition of Bel Air Park concession standard restrooms.
Good news, that project is still within the governor's budget.
So, it hasn't got to the red pen yet, but it's there.
It's still alive.
And then, obviously, finalized the master plan for the Veterans Park.
But I think that we could do, you know, internally and maybe with low cost as well.
Because I know that the Parks and Rec Department, sorry, Advisory Committee has also reviewed that as well.
And then, obviously, commenced the planning construction phase for Coastal Ridge Preserve that we've had some discussion regarding now what's the next phase for that, for the construction.
We have the master plan, but now we've got to start going through the construction drawings.
And we're actually negotiating with consultants so I can provide that cost in the budget.
Hopefully, maybe if I could get it in the next couple of weeks, maybe I could probably try to squeeze it in this year's budget as well.
It's roughly in that $70,000 range.
We're still negotiating it down with it.
That is to complete the construction plans for Coastal Ridge Preserve.
We do have a master plan, but now it's the construction plans.
Public Works Department, a lot of these projects are funded through different grants.
The Saga Bay drainage improvements.
We have ARPA grants to finalize construction for the Bel Air neighborhood.
You know, that's currently on the final stages.
But, again, funded through ARPA and FDEP grants.
Capital improvement projects from various funding sources.
The commenced design for Southwest 212th Street.
If you recall, Southwest 212th Street is going to be the backside of our Legacy Park.
But that is a four-lane highway there.
We actually had to do a study because we had to comply with the new state law that if you reduce any type of travel lanes, you have to do a traffic study.
We did the traffic study.
The traffic study came back that is eligible.
So, now you'll see that later tonight on agenda item for work authorization for our consultant being paid through PTP as well.
Finalized Frangio Road.
As you see, that's coming towards the final end project there.
Hopefully, knock on wood.
Hopefully, it's going to be under budget as well.
And ahead of schedule, we have Caribbean Boulevard.
We call it the J, as we call it, right?
You know, Caribbean Boulevard from 87 to 184 commenced that construction.
And then we also have finalizing the design for Marlin Road Complete Streets that we received two different grants.
And that's the one we received from Federal Appropriations as well.
Federal Appropriations commenced the Saga Bay Lake Pump Station project.
Again, that's a federal appropriation.
Finalized Marlin Road, the design.
Commenced construction on Lakes by the Bay.
We also received another million dollars for federal appropriation for Lakes by the Bay Section 4 water quality improvements there.
Transportation-related projects.
Continued the on-demand service.
It's funded through FDOT grants as well as PTP Transportation Funds portion of it.
Continuing negotiations for joint participation agreement.
This is something that we have been working really closely with Commissioner Cohen-Higgins.
Myself and the mayor went and met with her, you know, several months ago.
We then had at least four follow-up meetings with county staff.
They loved the project.
We had a cost-benefit analysis.
The cost-benefit analysis came back at a ratio of 2.04.
Anything above a 2, it's a great criteria.
We've had the conversation with the Public Works Director of Monmouth County.
We're trying to see where we can include that in the long-range plan.
This project here is going to be almost a $20 million project.
That's going to be our next Franger Road, if that makes sense.
You can see here the number of amount of grants that we receive, the design phase, the state appropriation, as well as the direct appropriation.
We have federal grant for 4.4 towards the construction phase, and we also have an FDOT lab grant for a million.
What you do not see on that board is hopefully we'll get the thumbs up or thumbs down at the end of July for a FDOT CIGP grant.
Don't ask me what a CIGP stands for.
Yeah, CIGP grant, but that, to me, it's a $4 million grant.
If we receive that, that's a $4 million swing there, too, as well.
So Alfredo Nuneer did the presentation several months ago.
We've gotten some informal great feedback, but it goes through the ranking process.
But, again, we showed our projects, our track record.
Hopefully we'll get that.
That's a $4 million swing there.
Any questions so far for that?
Okay.
Councilman Lord, you're recognized.
Thank you, Mayor.
Maybe I missed it.
When you were going through the parks and rec projects for next year, I didn't see a project for the Saga Bay playground.
Are we not going through with that?
Great question.
The Saga Bay playground, it's included in this year's budget.
It's the inclusive playground that we have.
In the state budget that's been presented to the governor's office, we have been already approved.
Our grant has been approved, but not funded.
Okay.
So in the governor's overall budget, there's funding for FDEP.
Sorry, FURDAP.
It's a FURDAP grant for various grants.
We are rolling that.
So once the governor approves that and he approves that line item, then we are essentially, that's being funded.
That will be funded.
So that's still in this year's budget.
It's still under this year's budget.
But great follow-up question.
In fact, one of the things that we're doing there, just a side note, is I challenge our parks department because, you know, we had to take down our playground at Bell Air Park because of safety reasons.
So we did our own internal inspections with our own consultant, and we had to take it down.
There's no playground there now.
So one of the things that we're having a discussion, I had Lakeisha actually talk to the state, was if we get awarded, can we just shift the playground to that park?
Because Saga Bay Park, when you see that playground, it's still usable.
There's a couple different items that might need to be upgraded, which at least I could have that park there with those items there and maybe use it over to at Bell Air Park that has no parking, no playground equipment at all.
It's a lot of moving parts.
We're waiting for that folks to see if we can make that shift.
If that is, then we'll report back to the council.
And it would still be an inclusive park.
100% inclusive.
We have the footprint there.
Yeah, we'll have that footprint there.
It's just one of those like, okay, well, is the other park playground equipment, Saga Bay Park?
Yes, maybe we have to do a little bit, a couple upgrades, but not $250,000 worth of upgrades.
And again, another park at the other end.
Right.
Thank you.
That's the moving parts that we have there.
And then also in Bell Air Park, we know that that building is unsafe structure.
Our parks director has been working with our different vendors to start taking out all different pieces of equipment.
There's a lot of electrical things that need to be put out there.
We actually, Etienne and I think Alan actually went to our friends at North Bay Village where they had a, I want to say, Paul Vogelpark in North Bay Village.
It was ex-mayor there.
And they had almost like a prefab building that is a restroom building with water fountain and, you know, ADA restrooms.
And it's like one of those like literally just, you know, coming like a Ted's shed, but it's a lot fancier where it meets the Florida building code.
So we actually looked at that to see how quick we could, you know, once we demolish it, can we at least put something out there?
Because right now that park is being operated, you know, with porta potties right now.
So we want to make sure that we have that also in place.
That's another moving part.
In fact, that's Bell Air Park building is on the governor's list for appropriations, for approval.
So thank you, Ralph.
Anything else?
Anything else?
All right.
Continue, sir.
Okay.
Thank you, Mayor and members of the council.
So now we go to Councilmember Ramirez, what we talked about here.
Save our homes, right, from excessive property taxes.
The big gorilla in the room, as we call it, right?
We understand that question there.
There's also been a lawsuit filed.
We understand we're monitoring that.
All the cities are monitoring that.
If approved, it'll go in effect January 2027.
We understand that.
Provides new homes exemptions, the first 150 in 27 and 250,000 in 28.
And we're going to get into what our impact is going to be.
It also creates a five-year homes exemption of the first 50.
And you can read the rest there where it talks about non-school levy property taxes.
This is going to be really, really tough for all the cities in the state of Florida.
Requires legislators to prescribe a uniform procedure for certain local governments to increase
the amount of assessed property values exempt taxes.
Reduce the non-homestead property assessment increase limits from 10% to 5%.
That is a big game changer.
That is basically saying that all the commercial properties, they'll have a cap of 5% versus
10% cap.
So that has a major impact as well.
So what's that mean?
And obviously, sorry, limits the use of everyone revenue for counties and municipalities
for specific purposes.
So we know there's a multi-page, 100-page bill.
What's that mean for us?
Proposed additional 150,000 homes to property exemption.
We know there's going to be 10,200 homes that are going to be impacted in the town.
I mean, that we have, because we've been working closely with the Florida League of Cities.
We have 19,000 homes in Cutler Bay.
10,000 are going to be affected.
Reduction, $2.5 million per year.
That is a 22% reduction of our total Avalon collected.
Our total Avalon collected last year was $11.6 million.
I want to keep this on the screen for a second, because that is something that you see us, and you're going to see us now tighten our belt in anticipation of that, right?
We are preparing for the worst, Mayor and Members of Council.
That's what I'm trying to prepare everybody for the worst.
We know there's going to be challenges, but at the same time, for us to be fiscally responsible, we know what that number is now.
We know what that number is.
22% reduction.
Part of the issue is that a lot of folks have been here forever, right?
And yet that 3%, you know, save your homes.
But again, we know that this is the numbers that we have.
Our challenge for next year, our challenge for next year kind of, you know, goes back to what we were talking earlier.
We're going to develop a proposed budget.
I'm challenging all my department heads and myself as well to reduce a 2.5% reduction.
You're like, hey, what's 2.5%?
Well, it's $760,000.
I mean, that's my challenge now is with all departments, we're literally item by item by item.
Like we do, like we've done in the past with the council, but it's when I was like, hey, well, do I need this or not?
Am I doing this for extra services or not?
Because we know what's going to happen here.
So instead of having that big hit once, and again, that's my goal of 2.5%, but there's going to be something that's going to be a budget that's going to be a lot less, right?
We understand that we have the relationship with the Miami County Sheriff's Department.
I've been in communication with my counterparts in Palmetto Bay and Pinecrest, the other two contractors.
We know those prices are going up.
So we're collectively setting up meetings with the sheriff's staff to kind of like look at what else can be, you know, further reduced or maybe spread across the county versus the three municipalities.
I'm using that for example.
That's our biggest department.
Our biggest department.
You're going to see that later in the presentation.
Obviously, you know, I've had this individual meetings with council members, educate our residents the use of the Avalon taxes.
I mean, I know that when I spoke to our state representative and our state senator, you know, he said, you know, Ralph, we know that you guys in Palmetto Bay run a lean machine, you know, but it's going to be even harder for you.
I'm like, yeah, I know.
I know.
I mean, so that's something that we're going to be looking at.
And obviously identify potential non-essential services, which can be further reduced, anticipate approval for the property tax ballot question.
Again, that's going to us line, literally line by line, line by line, you know, because we know that this storm is coming.
And how do we anticipate it?
We will educate.
We will have different workshops.
There's the League of Cities is helping all a lot of different cities put out, you know, talking points, go out to a lot of homeowner association.
And it's going to be, I don't want to say a scare tactic.
I think it's just more of an education campaign.
Did you know your taxes paid for this?
That's why in my previous presentation, you see a lot of different roadway projects that we've taken for granted.
And I know that I've had this conversation with Councilman Duncan where we say, hey, all these projects, non-advert-alarm taxes are used.
Wow, that's great.
Because at least we continue a lot of those capital improvement projects.
Some cities aren't that lucky to say that.
So we will continue our capital improvement projects there, but some other items that are funded through Avalorm, that's going to have to have a serious look at as well.
I just want to point out that, you know, I'm not a math whiz by a long shot, but in some cities, your rolled back rate is actually going to be a rolled up rate.
Because in order to capture the same amount of revenue as you did in the prior year, you would have to have a higher millage rate than you did in the previous year.
And under those circumstances, you know, the threshold for increasing millage would be lower than it normally is, which is a kind of an interesting anomaly that would occur from this.
But, you know, luckily you have a very low millage rate.
And if you found that the reduction in revenue under the current millage rate was inadequate to be able to pay for all of the needs in terms of services and quality of life that you want to deliver, you have a lot of room under the cap.
Much more than most cities.
Correct. And Mitch, that's something that when I just came back from the city manager's conference online, that was a topic conversation where some cities to get to make up the difference in what they're losing, they're going to go over the 10 mil cap.
You know, they're going to go over the 10 mil cap.
They can't.
They can't.
They can't.
That's their pickle, right?
Yeah.
You know, so just to give you a good example, member council, as you saw the chart before, we're at 2.8332.
Just some quick math that, you know, Robert and I did to recoup the funds, we will have to be somewhere in the 4 mil rate.
I mean, so, yeah, that's a conversation that, you know, remember, we've been up here very, you know, stewardship of our coffers.
And, you know, we'll sit there and split hairs about, you know, going up 0.0232 or something like that.
Now we're talking about a full two numbers there.
You know, so again, that's a challenge.
We're not in it by ourselves.
There's going to be a mountain of campaign.
Again, what I wanted to show the council is that we will provide you a budget.
My own ceiling goal that I have there is that $706,000.
Again, that's a challenge that we're going to go through with staff as well.
So that is the storm that we know that's coming, you know, members of council.
So we understand that.
So there's going to be a big edge-to-edge campaign.
Next, now, not only that, now we have House Bill 1329.
Okay.
That one is known as the Local Government Finance Transparency Accountability Act.
This bill is already in place.
It goes in effect on January 1.
The other one is dependent on the ballot.
This is already in the books, as we call it.
All right?
So what's this do?
The effects.
Requires budgets to be posted on the municipality's website.
And we're going to go through each one in a second here.
Requires, sorry, requires quarterly employee compensation reports and annual budget calendars.
Requires an annual budget cutting exercise, BCE, which results posted online 10%.
Every city must have a workshop and show how they're reducing their budget by 10% on this bill.
Updates how long budget information must remain posted online.
Requires counties to provide at least five days' notice before budget amendment hearings.
So we're going to just, I'm going to go briefly through each one.
Because, I mean, I think a lot of it we already comply with.
But I want to make this a word to the council.
Because this is a whole game changer of what the state's trying to do to unify everyone to do it the same way.
So budget posted on the website.
One of the things you're going to see us do here shortly in our main budget button, our main page, that's going to be the most important button right there.
Budget reports.
Okay, so that's something that we're going to be changing here shortly.
It's going to say budget reports.
There it is, right on the main page.
No click, click, click, click.
Our adopted budgets for the last four years will be, as soon as you click it, you're going to get to see our adopted budget.
As you know, as transparent as we are, we provide the budget book.
The budget book will be provided there.
It's provided already in the agenda item.
But again, click, click, click, click.
This is going to be one click.
You're there.
You see the budget book right there.
Full transparency.
Requires quarterly employee and annual budget calendars.
Let's talk about that for a second.
So this is the new requirement.
Employee, name, job title, department, salary.
What they made that quarter.
And what's the year to date.
For us, we're like, okay, let's see what we do already with our transparency budget.
Well, here's what we present in the budget workshops and hearings.
We have, I'm using that for, you know, the finance.
We already have the position and the salary.
Kind of break it down that way.
So we know that we've got to add some more columns.
So again, for us, we'll add that.
But the game changer now, obviously, you put names and titles departments.
But we kind of do that already.
But we'll update that.
The budget development calendar.
I'm just going to go through so you can see.
Just click all the ones that are reds or new requirements that we will start complying with.
The ones that are green, we already do.
In one shape or form or another, right?
And I'm just going to put them on the screen here and just, you know.
Oops, sorry.
Right there.
So, I mean, again, you know.
If you go to the first, you know, green there.
It says June, July, August.
Insert any workshops and proposed budget meetings open to the public.
We're here now.
We're using that now.
Example.
I don't know.
I'm just going to the second column, the third bullet there, August.
Inform property owners of public workshops on budget as applicable.
We post it on our website.
You know, we do all that.
And also, these are just the workshops, right?
But now, we have been historically, and I've always kid about it, that we do three workshops a year in the two required hearings.
This is now telling everyone you got to start doing workshops.
So, for us, we already do the workshops.
Just a matter of maybe just posting in a different format or what have you.
I don't know.
I'm just using, for example, July, the first one in the column.
Local governing body adopts their tentative military.
Everybody does that in July.
So, now what the state legislator is doing is saying, you're going to unify this.
So, again, this is part of that one requirement.
So, it doesn't scare me.
It's there.
Requires an annual budget cutting exercise results posted online.
10%.
We just talked about that, right?
So, give you an idea.
This just tells you that it's going to be, you know, fiscal year 27, 28.
That's when it starts.
Gitch is giving an idea.
This is an excerpt from our budget book.
You know, our general fund, the department's there.
$30 million.
Using the 10%.
We're talking about over $3 million.
Going back to that column we talked about before, for the impact of the $150,000.
We're at 2.5.
Getting close.
You see?
We're getting close.
So, we're going to do that exercise anyway.
Just to give you an idea.
This is our revenues.
$29 million.
Our largest revenue, obviously, is Avalor.
It's 39%.
This is right from our budget book.
This kind of gives you graphically what it shows you that's 39%.
Again, I had to reintroduce this again.
We're still the ninth lowest.
And now, this is part of our budget book, too.
This is part of something that's actually within our charter.
It says that during the charter, Section 6.2, Citizens Bill of Rights, A11, now on the bottom,
that we have to put this on our budget, and we do that every year.
Folks, our biggest department, which is our public safety, it's the police department.
See that number there?
$13 million.
Remember, we said that we collect $11.6 million for Avalor?
So, we didn't cover that.
But, in the new legislation, the police department is carved out.
The police and fire are carved out.
Summary.
Total general fund budget, $300 million.
Using the town's current budget, 10%.
We're at $3 million.
Compared to the fiscal impact of $150,000, we're at $2.5.
So, you know, we're getting close to that number anyway.
So, this is that exercise that...
Going through the BCE cutting exercise,
something that we would have to do anyway, give or take, you know, $500,000 there.
Updates on how long the budget information must remain posted online.
Last four years.
Well, okay, remember that little button?
Yeah, we got the button.
Not a problem.
We're going to post it.
Four years.
Detail budget book.
There it is.
Two clicks away.
Requires counties, and I say the word counties,
to provide at least five-day notice before budget amendment and hearings.
Town already complies.
Why?
It looks familiar.
Budget amendments that we have here that Robert puts together.
We have normally done the month of May.
Council meeting advertised in the website, e-news, and community newspaper center pages.
We have the agenda summary, which is the manager's memo, the resolution, the adopted budget amendments.
And we also post it online as well.
So, it's just a matter of, you know, complying with that section there.
Again, we don't have to, but what do we do anyway?
Any questions for the House Bill?
Nothing but roses and sunshine here.
All right.
Go ahead, Councilman Duncan.
You're right.
Thank you.
It was just a comment.
So, the exercise that we're discussing as far as the $2.5 million, that's for the $150,000 threshold.
But to remind our residents that that goes up to a $250,000 threshold in the following fiscal year,
which then I believe would amount to a $4.3 million cut.
Correct, Councilmember.
So, I provided there the, you know, the best of the worst case.
$150,000 increase in property homestead exemption will have an impact of $2.5 million.
The full $250,000 homestead exemption will have even a devastating impact of $4.3 million.
$4.3 million.
You know?
So, we're starting gradually looking at those.
I mean, I wish I could sit there and say that the budget visioning would be, you know, nice vision.
But, I mean, I think we like having a nice, open, frank conversation with the council and the community.
And this is where we're at.
This is where we're at.
So, yes, I mean, I know that it may not be a lot.
What I'm sitting there saying, I'm sitting our own internal goal of trying to come in with a budget that's like 2.5% less than last year.
But that's $706,000.
At least we're moving it.
We're moving it.
We're moving it.
And that's where we're going back to a lot of items that we're going to have to go through of what's essential, what's not essential.
You know, making those tough decisions.
Other comments.
Nobody wants to say anything on here.
I'm just like, oh, my goodness.
You know, there is, I guess, a downside from being efficient.
Yes.
And when I hear that, Mayor and I say it jokingly, and I love, you know, Representative Blanco and Senator Colati, but they both said that, oh, it's going to be a little bit harder for you guys.
I'm like, yes.
And I know that we've had this conversation individually.
I mean, maybe it should have been intended for a lot of the counties, right?
We're not alone.
We're not alone.
A lot of cities are doing this.
Some, I don't want to say, some may have more fat than others, you know, but we are lean.
We are lean here.
So, again, it's one of those that we're going to look at every single corner that we can, Mayor and Mayor's Council.
And the challenge starts now in this fiscal year coming up.
It's a double whammy for us because, again, I think we're one of the largest, the city that has the largest impact of homesteaded homes that are under 250, nearly 60%.
So it is a real big whammy.
And which means we're going to have to get real, real creative between now and the end of the year when we get our final budget going on working with your staff to let us know their recommendations.
Hopefully they're going to be creative as possible as well, but it's not a great thing.
Is it doable?
Yeah.
Or will we, you know, there's mention of grants coming from the state.
We don't know any of the details on that yet.
But judging by our success with the red pin in a couple of years, I don't know how much success we'll have with that.
But we'll obviously have to be taking a look at that as well.
And, again, it's going to be a major partnership, right?
It's going to be a team effort.
Where I say team effort is that is, you know, us leaning on the expertise of our town attorney's office, right?
Because we have a lot of cities that are in the same boat.
There's been a lot of discussions amongst the managers, right?
Of maybe different creative ways of maybe creating special taxing districts or what have you, right?
But, I mean, again, we've got to look at all the different options that we've never had to explore before.
But bottom line for us and the message that I've been telling our state representative and senator that, thank them both.
They actually came and sat down and looked at it, our budget.
And I said, here it is, guys.
This is it.
I mean, just when you see their eyes light up saying our police department is $13 million.
Nothing against our police department, our sheriff's department, right?
That's why we incorporated.
I understand that.
But our ad valorem of 11.6 doesn't even cover that.
And we know that that's something that cannot be cut, right?
So even if it did cover it, it's off-limits.
I want to say off-limits.
You know, it was carved out.
That and the fire department was carved out.
So it's looking at different creative ways that we could do things differently.
It might be looking at every single agreement.
Every single, you know, agreement that we have with different vendors or, you know, I hate to say it, leagues as well.
I mean, everything is up, is up.
It's not a scare tactic.
It's reality.
It's reality.
So that's why, you know me, mayor and councilor, this is how we operate in Calabaya.
It's going to be a reality looking at those, you know, can you supplement these type of services or what services are non-essential.
So it's going to be, this is going to be one of our toughest years, you know, but again, all 467, you know, cities in the state of Florida going through that as well.
I think it's real helpful, the exercise of kind of identifying what exactly does our ad valorem cover.
You know, and again, those non-essentials can be anything from our STEM camps to our elderly activities to public works, cleaning.
You know, they seem like they're non-essential, but the removal obviously will reduce the quality of life.
So trying to find that balance between those things is going to be very, very, very difficult.
And I agree.
And I think, mayor, that's going to be part of the education campaign, right?
Well, you know, because that way people, oh, I didn't know what pays for that.
Oh, I didn't know.
Well, I'm educating you now.
I'm not advocating.
I'm educating you of what the impacts are going to be.
Because I know Spine Linder, I know Mitchell, keep me out of trouble there with the council, you know.
And again, you know, the firm, I love it.
I love it because, you know, there's a lawsuit that's been filed.
But again, we're looking at different creative ways.
The lawsuit really does not challenge the concept.
It just seeks to have the state clarify the language of the ballot measure so that it's clean and truthful.
Because right now it's confounding and not completely and not truthful regarding what the actual import of the measure is under the current ballot language.
So if it's successful, the attorney general will be required to correct the language and present a clearer ballot language for the voters.
You'll know, I think, if you look into it, that there are several fairly conservative-leaning organizations, including Florida Tax Watch, that have come out in opposition to this.
Because, you know, in their view, governments are not actually going to become leaner.
They're just going to find alternates in terms of the ways to fund the services that their communities want.
And that may just move the burden of the taxes over to commercial property and to renters, largely.
And that's something that Florida Tax Watch has, you know, warned is not what it's seeking in terms of its goals of reducing the burden on taxpayers.
As I was told in one interview, or actually, as I said in one interview, if you're a homeowner, you're going to lose, you're going to gain by losing, not having to pay certain amount of taxes.
But you're also going to lose services, which you're providing.
So you might break even.
If you were not a homeowner, more than likely, you're going to lose the services.
More than likely, you would see an increase in the military for the non-homesteads, which would mean if you're a renter, you're probably paying more.
So you're a lose-lose there.
And somebody's pointed out, like, it's not the case here because you have county collecting your waste, although it may impact because the county's going to need.
They were very reluctant to raise the waste fees at the last go-round.
The mayor asked them to increase waste fees, and the commission rejected that idea.
But they're going to have no choice.
And the waste fees, if, you know, the subsidy that the general fund pays into the cost of waste, a taxpayer who's funding that has that, that's partly deductible from federal income taxes.
The waste fee that you pay is not.
So if they put the waste fee to the full amount and didn't subsidize it, a typical taxpayer might see an increase in, not just in that cost, but a loss of the tax benefit that they would have had had it been covered by general fund taxes.
All the things is simple.
People would not understand.
It's very, very complicated.
You know, Rafa, I really look forward to, again, as we can start getting a clearer picture to educate the public and the council what the ad vorum comes so we can start getting creative and having open discussions while we need getting feedback from our citizens on their ideas.
So we're all in this together.
And we, if this is a pass, it's basically our hands are tied.
Unless you can come up with other creative things.
You know, do you have a, you know, do you have a parks and recreation bond that the city gets to vote on every year?
Do you want to keep your parks going?
Yeah, vote for this bond.
Or do you want to do public works bonds?
There's other creative ways to do it.
But like, like Mitch said, it won't go away.
We'll just, unless it's absolutely not needed.
It may get reduced a slight bit, but in a town like Cutler Bay, who is very, very efficient, it's almost going to be draconian unless we can find creative ways or be one of those lucky recipients of the grants that the, as mentioned, coming through.
But I don't think we're going to hold our breaths on that.
And I think members council, I mean, it's going to be critical because, like I mentioned, we're not, we're all in it together, all the cities.
So I know that there's a mayor's coalition meeting coming up, you know, the chamber's hosting.
Another one as well, there's going to be the Florida League of Cities this year, their annual conference.
It's in Broward County in mid-August.
That's going to be the talk of the town, you know.
So I encourage, you know, that, you know, attend those, you know, as well, because, you know, we're looking for creative ways.
You know, we're looking for creative ways.
I mean, you know, I'm in constant contact with different, you know, the managers throughout the county.
You know, it's kind of like, you know, figuring out different ways, you know, what creative ways that you could do.
I could tell you that we're in a better position if that makes, if there's any silver lining there, than some of the other municipalities that are in that middle trade of, you know, seven above.
You know, as we catch them, we were in the lower end there, but we're in a better financial position.
It's going to be hit, yes, but there's some other councils and marriages that have an even tougher job with that.
So I just like to end with that, you know.
We're in a better position.
Remind me that Monty Python movie.
Hung upside down and, oh, I wish I knew it was the other guy getting whipped.
Oh, you're lucky.
So, all right.
Any other questions or comments?
Let's have a really.
Okay.
Councilwoman Duncan.
I'm sorry, Lord.
Lord, that's okay.
I was looking positive there.
I just wanted to add on to what Ralph was saying.
I saw that they opened the registration for the FLC's conference at the Diplomat, which is mid-August.
I've already registered.
It's right in the middle of our budget talks, right?
And it will be the hot topic.
So I think it would be prudent for as many of us who can make it.
You know, I'm taking time off of work to go, but I think it's a wealth of information for us.
And let's use the league and the information they can offer and try and attend that if we could.
I think it's going to be really important this year.
I agree.
There's all those concepts.
We can learn so much.
Right.
Was that anything else, Ralph?
No, Mayor.
We'll see you back at 6 o'clock for the regular council meeting.
10 minutes.
All right.
See you at 10.
In 10.
We'll see you.