La City Commission discutirá el presupuesto propuesto de proyectos de capital para FY2027, incluyendo presentaciones de varios departamentos. También revisarán los resultados de una encuesta de presupuesto de los comisionados y establecerán prioridades presupuestarias.
📹 Del video · 5h 0m
Transcrito automáticamente del video oficial de la reunión (voz a texto — puede contener errores).
. . .
Good morning.
Today is June 9th.
The time is now 9.03 and we will call the City Commission
Budget Workshop to order.
First on the agenda is the Capital Project Workshop
discussion.
And we have Lord Stewart presenting.
Good morning, Vice Mayor and Commissioners.
Welcome to Workshop No. 1 for this fiscal year.
You guys are up for a challenging season ahead of you,
obviously with all the legislative proposals and requests
that are coming up.
And we'll continue to just kind of go through that process
alongside you guys through this.
For today's workshop, we've created an agenda.
Again, just as a guide, you guys will kind of dictate where
we go through this conversation.
The intent of today is to go through capital requests.
So beginning with the general fund, we'll go department by
department on all the requests that we have for this year.
Then we'll transition to the utility fund and then end up
with stormwater at the end.
In front of you, you should have two packets.
The first one has this large 11 by 17 page.
And I want to just reference the third page of that
document real quick.
And that just gives you an overall summary.
So it should look like this as yellow at the bottom with
red numbers.
So this right here is where we're starting out the budget.
So you can see here the general fund, utility fund, and
stormwater fund.
Each one of them right now starting with a deficit.
General fund right now, $29,010,199 in deficit.
Utility fund, $34,830,000 in deficit.
And stormwater fund, $319,750.
Obviously a big bulk of that is this is including all of
the capital requests and operational requests submitted by
the directors.
As we go through today's conversation and you hear each
project, we'll be listening in and kind of tracking with
you guys items that you agree with, items that you disagree
with, items that you want to cut.
And we'll continue to keep a tabulation as we go through
today's workshop.
So again, just kind of wanted to set the stage of where we
're starting and then where we need to go is to get to a
balanced budget.
One of the legislative items that came out this year as
part of a house bill is now every season we have to post a
10% budget cut scenario, right?
And for this year, it kind of ends up being a perfect storm
for us because a $10 million cut to the general fund is $7.
8 million.
And it's the same amount that we're expecting to lose with
the homestead exemption.
So going through this scenario, my recommendation is let's
try to balance the budget first.
And then once we get to that balanced budget, let's go
through that hypothetical $8 million cut and see which
items you guys would like to, again, is that operations?
Is that capital?
Let's kind of have that conversation as a phase two because
it will kind of lead us into next year.
Here's my question here quickly.
So now what you're saying to this commission that we're
going to probably need to do two budgets.
Correct.
You know, go do what if.
In November, we don't know.
Right.
So January 2027, all of this we're doing now, maybe no more
because we have to do a total.
So we're going to prepare two budgets now.
Basically correct.
And now it's legislative required.
Before it wasn't, but that 10% cut scenario has to now be
posted on the website before final adoption, 14 days before
final adoption.
But just to be clear, we do not believe that this current
budget will be affected by that vote in November, that it
will take effect.
It said January 2020.
Right.
It takes effect in January, but that means you've got to be
preparing for the next budget year that's coming up.
So that is what it looks like, but we've not gotten
confirmation on that yet.
Right.
Okay.
So the hypothetical, again, will be for a future year's
budget.
This year, phase one should be let's balance it based off
what we have and the revenues.
We've gone ahead and included, you know, as part of this
packet, phases three and four, and we'll come back to those
, is the millage increase.
We received uncertified values June 1st.
And based off those values, we think there's going to be
about a $2.4 million increase in taxable revenues this year
.
So we've gone ahead and built that into these numbers with
the deficit that you see here today.
So.
Or you really think that 10% of our tax, our ad valorem,
comes from $150,000 and less?
So right now that would be about 30%.
So our total ad valorem right now is $30 million.
So $10 million of that is we're estimating we're going to
lose up to the $250,000 exemption.
We'll lose $8 million at the $150,000 based on our
calculations.
I thought the $250,000 was 2023.
Correct.
So we're projecting $8 million first year and then another
$2 million in that second year in 2028.
So $10 million loss overall.
Right.
But I'm just concerned that the houses that they're ad val
orem, that the value is $150,000 or less.
And hypothetically speaking, in case the county property
appraiser is listening in, I seriously doubt that there is
going to be in 2028 that many houses that are going to be
valued at $250,000 or less.
I think they're going to be valued at $250,000 or less.
I think they're going to be valued at $250,000 or less.
They're going to be valued at $250,000 or less.
They're going to be valued at $250,000 or less.
They're going to be valued at $250,000 or less.
They're going to be valued at $250,000 or less.
They're going to be valued at $250,000 or less.
So that the county doesn't lose much money as well.
My house was built in 1978 and is valued at $275,000 now.
Right.
And so hypothetically speaking, if you're watching the
county appraiser, I can only see that going up.
I do not see them reducing property.
Right.
And I agree in that scenario.
Your $280,000 home, by the statute, it could go up a
maximum of 3% per year.
So the property appraiser, even if it wanted to assess it
at $350,000 or $400,000, it cannot legally do that.
It's capped by the Save Our Homes Act within the
legislation.
So it's maxed at 3%.
But for your bill, that $280,000 assessment will remain the
same.
You'll receive a $150,000 exemption.
Year one, $250,000.
So the taxable value will go down to about $30,000.
And that's what you'll pay tax on.
So our formula kind of builds those factors in.
And because there's so many homes in that $200,000, $300,
000, and that revenue is now going to be lost,
we're projecting that $8 million loss in year one, which is
next year, right?
It's not this budget season.
It's next budget season.
But by doing that 10% scenario cut now, we can go ahead and
know what's the commission's direction and desire
as we forecast for that next fall of the year and those
impacts that are to come.
Well, have staff looked at and talked about how we're going
to recruit the difference when we get to that $250,000?
Because we've got to make that money up somewhere.
Right.
But if not, then we're going to have to cut staff or can't
hire police or fire.
So have you even talked about maybe how we're going to reca
pture the money that we're going to be losing after the $250
,000 coming into place?
So right now there's little guidance from the state.
Obviously, they're pushing this initiative forward without
giving municipalities a lot of guidance on what to do.
Obviously, sales tax has been a conversation, but we don't
know how that's going to be distributed.
Internally, we've had conversations about non-avalorum
assessments and what that looks like.
Again, is that a desire of the commission that they want us
to pursue these different revenue sources like a non-aval
orum assessment, right?
Because now, again, all it's becoming is a tax shift, not a
tax savings in this case.
And we're kind of contradicting what the state's doing.
But, again, there's a funding deficit that we need to
account for.
So we're kind of looking for direction.
Obviously, internally, we've been thinking about that.
We have the FGFOA conference next week.
I would expect that this is going to be a large
conversation at that conference for all the finance
directors.
I know Terrell had a FBRA meeting this week as well.
It was just telling me how concerned all municipalities are
with this legislative proposal and the impacts that it's
going to have.
Not only that, I just came from the Florida Legal Cities
Board of Directors meeting,
and that is a huge concern for all 411, 12,000
municipalities.
So it is a big issue.
It's something that we can't take lightly.
Just, again, today's conversation doesn't include CRA in
any of your documentation.
That will be on its own budget.
Obviously, we'll incorporate that at the end as part of the
overall.
I say that just to say that, again, that $8 million loss to
the city, but there is going to be about a $4.4 million
loss to the CRA if this goes into play, right?
Because all those homestead properties that are in the CRA
also will take a hit.
So just trying to paint the framework right now for you
guys to have this information as we continue to go through
the budget process.
So today, I think our biggest challenge is trying to get
the capital in line to balance this budget.
Obviously, in the next budget session, we'll talk about
operating line items and what that looks like.
But we're going to start with the general fund.
We're going to go department by department.
We're going to be in this general fund capital workbook
that kind of gives you department by department and has
page number references.
Which one of these books?
There's the one that says general fund.
Say it.
Say it.
Say it.
Both of them say general fund.
But before you get started, I want to tell Commissioner
West I absolutely agree with him.
This is like 2008 all over again.
Correct.
So where you all are just hiring all these people, Lord, I
think that you need to be thinking twice about hiring extra
people that you may have to stay as great as you are.
You're just going to have to go somewhere else and be great
.
Because that's my concern.
That's my concern with what I see now.
That there are some departments that are hiring all this
extra staff.
And I personally do not feel that it is needed at this time
.
So I agree with you, Commissioner West, on hiring people
because you feel you need an extra person to stand in line
at the cop machine that somebody's going to have to go.
And I don't want to see anybody go.
But it's going to be a tough job for you, Lord, to have to
let, you know, some of, like, your good people, your
favorite people, the ones that you like, may have to, like
I say, go and be great somewhere else.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So one of the things with this budget cycle that we did
last year and the plan is to do this year as well as every
position request will come before the commission at the
next meeting.
So you guys will be driving right now the ship of which
positions get included and which ones don't, which was the
way we did it last year as well.
So you guys are dictating what new positions get added.
Again, taking into consideration, these numbers right here
do not reflect any new position requests at all.
So just starting with the capital requests, I think the
easiest page for reference is page.
It's in the table of contents and it begins with page 12.
It's capital improvement plan by department.
So here this, again, this shows you the general overall
look of all the capital requests showing right around $34.5
million in total requests.
First department on this list is the police department and
they have two items.
The first is a public safety complex for $20 million.
And the second is vehicles replacement for patrol at $595,
000.
Each one of these items has a individual page that kind of
gives more explanation in case you guys, again, if you are
comfortable with it, we can move on, ask questions.
We can bring the police chief up to have more conversation
or we can continue to proceed through the capital requests
as you guys see fit.
Walmart, they want a public safety complex.
Where is this going to be?
And what are they going to do with the existing police
department?
I don't know.
Do you have land that?
I don't know where this land is.
So this actually will go, we're looking at between power
line and Baker Dairy, you know, where the new public's is.
Right behind there where I think we have about, if I'm not
mistaken, 30 acres.
So we're asking for 10.
But keep in mind, this is a complex, not just for police
department, also fire department.
So we're looking for 10 acres out of the 30.
So 20 million is your part of it and 80 million is the fire
department.
No, ma'am.
So I guess I kind of spoke for Cody and myself as part of
this building.
So it's basically the 20 million votes into that one
building for police campfire.
What are you going to do with the existing fire department?
I mean, police department.
Right now there's been talks of making it one, maybe a
substation.
And that's another conversation that we'll have to have
with the director and also team manager.
We're looking right now making it a substation.
And this will help with also response time on Highway 27
and everything else.
So one of the biggest parts of the substation.
Mayor Smith, I have one last question.
Yes.
And that is, I think that it's good to have a new complex
out there on the east side because there's so many
developments.
There's about, I don't know, 14,000 homes that are there.
Yes, ma'am.
But I am very concerned at the fact that you're going to
make the 127 a substation when you have Chandler Ridge,
West Ridge,
Fredo Grande.
You've got all of those that are there.
You've got Randa Ridge that's there.
You have the new super center area that is there.
You've got a lot of commercial that is there.
And the response time coming away from our line, it
concerns me if you're going to make that a sub.
So I think.
It's different.
Okay.
But while he said it's a substation, there still will be
folks there.
Now more than likely, you may have a detection from that.
Maybe it's somebody in other areas.
In the new area, we're looking at putting fire and the
police there.
Apparently, fire is having a common form of the police
there.
We know that you have a specified time that the fire has to
make it to the scene where you're going to die.
Apparently, we have a question about that now.
It's 45 minutes for police.
That's what the dispatchers did.
No, no, no, no.
It's like firecrackers.
That's the other hardest thing.
We've got to get you there within eight minutes.
We're on the last one.
It's kind of agreed.
And where we're at now?
Let's start.
We've got to agree with our parties.
The police standpoint is we need to kind of put police in
that area.
We're going to be able to do that.
I was there for them.
But is police working out there?
Because there are a lot of homes up in that area.
I think I'll public safety directly.
Speak to this, but at this time, they are not.
No.
We've got no police working out in the U.S.
And I think one of the things that's different about fire
and police is that fire response to something that's in
progress
from the fire station unless they just happen to already be
out on the road working something else.
Whereas police, they're in their cars and that's their
office.
So their office is spread out all over the city.
So their response time is based on where the administration
has put them throughout the city to respond to those.
I don't have a problem with police.
I don't have a problem with police.
I have a problem with, I mean, with fire.
I don't know if Cody's there.
I can't.
He's there.
Oh, okay.
But I do have a problem with 45 minutes for police.
Because if someone is breaking into my house or somebody
has shot half of my family and they're looking for me,
next in a closet somewhere, 45 minutes is a long time.
And if you are way out there on power line and Baker or
Johnson or wherever this is,
your response time is important as well.
Absolutely.
Because if my house is not on fire but my life is in danger
, I don't want to hear 45 minutes to get to me.
And we understand that and that's the reason why it.
Give me one second.
If I may, I think to speak to that point, I don't believe,
and Chief and Director can correct me if I'm wrong,
I don't believe the request is to completely remove law
enforcement's presence from the current station.
I think with the growth that we have, the number of
officers that we currently need to be able to accurately
protect and serve our city
with the land that we recently purchased,
I believe during those initial talks when we approved it,
it was that it could be a future home for law enforcement,
being that we have so many residents that are coming up in
that area.
I think that one subdivision alone is almost the size of a
small city right now.
So I think it's extremely important, number one,
to make sure that we can accurately have a command center
up the place for all of the officers,
for training and other things like that.
But we still have that presence on Highway 22.
So it's not to eliminate that.
It's just to expand, to accommodate, you know, the growth
there.
Yes.
For the record, let me state that as a law enforcement
professional,
if it takes us 45 minutes to get to the emergency call, we
've got a problem.
We have a big problem.
Okay, but that's what the dispatcher says.
I'm going to be surprised to say it takes 45 minutes before
we get there.
Commissioner, I think that just dispatcher, they say that
on all those calls that, you know,
because I think what happens when you call the county and
they tell you, you know, give us four,
they say that because it will be like, hey, they said four
to five minutes, but they got there in three minutes.
But they just give you that.
But I don't think, it should take four to five minutes
response.
No worry.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
I don't think that's the case.
But, Mr. Mayor, can I be recognized?
Yes.
But, quickly, you know, like I said, I'm from the law
enforcement profession as well, and thank you for your
service.
I know what it's like on the other side, wearing that
uniform.
But, have you looked at the stats and how many calls for
service have you all responded to in the east side of town?
I haven't heard.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
I haven't heard of the police.
department out on 27.
Many years ago.
For a reason.
Because that's where all of our traffic was.
But we didn't anticipate the growth being.
You know on the east side of town.
Not saying that you don't need another location.
You do because response time is the key.
I would just like to know from my seat.
How many calls have you responded for.
Police and fire in that area.
Since you know we've started developing.
East of the Payne city.
That's some information I can get to you.
At a later date.
I don't know.
Yeah.
And I think that helped us to say.
Hey.
We've had 800 calls over there.
That's justification.
You need to be over there.
You know.
And I can understand that.
But if you only had.
Four calls over there.
And we're going to put a whole public safe.
In some place.
You only had four calls.
Well.
I'm just using that hypothetically.
No.
We've got it.
Yes sir.
I just discussed that right there.
Okay.
We know.
The calls to the surface.
There is a need for.
And that's what we said.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And that's what we're going to do.
And we're going to do a lot of things.
And that's what we're going to do.
And we're going to do a lot of things.
And we're going to do a lot of things.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this last year.
And it's a 50% increase this year.
Yeah.
But in reality, you understand,
because you all respond to EMS calls also.
The majority of them could have been ES assistant type
calls.
And it wasn't house fire type calls.
They were just EMS assistants.
Yeah.
And in any situation, house fire is only going to be true.
Right.
That's right.
No matter where you're at.
80% of what we do is medical.
And currently, we'll be at BLS.
We'll move it to the EMS.
We'll take care of our staff.
I understand.
Yeah.
All right.
Thank you.
Mayor Smith, may I be recognized?
Amen.
I think what Commissioner West just said,
that's why they needed it.
Because we didn't anticipate the growth for 27.
And now, that was when we probably had 11,000 people.
Right.
So now we're up to 50.
So I don't want us to be reactive.
I think we need to go ahead and plan ahead of time and be
proactive.
Because we're not going to stop growing.
If we have 2,500 families a month coming to Polk County,
can you imagine what's going to happen?
And over there, what is that, Massey Road?
That is a whole little city by itself.
Oh, that Powerline Road.
I'm talking about Massey right now.
Oh, hey, on 27?
Yeah.
That's a whole little city itself.
Then on Powerline Road, we see the leaps of bound and
growth that it has.
So I do applaud them for seeing the vision ahead of time.
And we don't want to be reactive.
And we want to be proactive in all that we do.
We're definitely growing.
I'm not saying you don't want to just anticipate.
No, let's go ahead and get it.
Yeah.
And we'll thank you.
Another piece of that, the building that we're in, it's
definitely outdated.
Our property and evidence area definitely needs to be rev
amped.
We have some ventilation problems in there.
I know when the director first got there, he smelled
something that I didn't smell
because I was there so long.
So we're definitely outdated.
I think it's time.
Well, I can tell you what's outdated, the fire department
behind the police department.
I think that was a terrible location that we operate out of
a trailer.
That's why the fire calls there.
That is, I'm being real.
I was embarrassed when we did the tour.
And I don't know about my count, my seat mates, when we
went out there.
Did y'all have witnessed that?
Yes.
We should have been relocated our fire someplace.
If I may, just one quick question here.
I know before we acquired that land, had there been any due
diligence done to see if there was any additional
property on Highway 27.
No sir, not for fire.
No, are you speaking for police or fire?
For police.
No sir, not for fire.
But Mr. Mayor, I'm not against that.
I think it's proactive and I agree with Commissioner
Johnson that it's proactive and there's a vision and it's
going into a capital project.
You know, we can expand our capital project over.
That's what we did with the Lake Eevee event center.
That became a capital project that we have for the next 20,
25 years.
So, in this need, we're growing.
We're not going to stop the growth here.
We're not even probably landlocked.
We're surrounded by other municipalities, but I think our
growth is going to be anticipated on somewhere.
I read by 2045 we're going to be probably 70-something
thousand people here in the city.
I don't have an issue with the public safety building going
over there, but I do have an issue where we're going to
have all of our administration over there.
I think that if we did anything, you split your
administration over.
You have the chief over here, but you have your deputy
chief over here.
That's a big building.
That's the plan, sir.
Sorry to cut you off.
That is the plan.
We're actually looking at some report right now.
Okay.
So, that's also part of the plan that we just built in.
Okay.
Yeah.
I'm not opposed to them going to get a public safety
building.
I think if you have a city here, we're going to continue to
grow.
Mr. Mayor, may I be recognized?
You may.
Okay, thank you.
And I also agree to move forward with this because I think
you mentioned it as well, that when we discussed and we
purchased this property,
we entertained the ideal for police, fire, and also
possibly an event center on that side of town.
I am all in favor of police and fire going there.
I know we do have 30 acres and you're only standing for 10
to be police and fire, so it still gives us opportunities
to do other things.
But rather or not, even if we need more, just to house
police and fire there and then whatever else, I think we
definitely should move on because move on forward with this
because this is something that is very needed.
During the tour, I got a contact while I was out there and
just laying.
But we didn't smell it, so we do know that we need
something bigger and better and also for fire like
Commissioner West stated.
So if we can definitely get this rolling and I'm all in
favor of police and fire going on that property.
Mayor Smith.
Mayor Smith.
Yes.
I never said I was not in favor of this.
I'm all about public safety.
And what I said was my concern that there's not going to be
police, enough police sent, enough police to cover 27 up to
the fire station.
And there are quite a number of houses and townhouses that
are behind the hospital.
And just think about Lake Heather Hills itself and all the
businesses that are up there.
So that's where my concern is that there is, you say you're
only going to have detectives there on 27.
I just, that's my concern is that we also need to, maybe it
's going to be next year, Omar, but we need to have some
police presence up there on 27 for all those houses as well
.
Um, because, um, trying to make that left turn and go north
off of 27 from where you are now, all the residents don't
always stop to get there.
And everything is not burglary that is there.
Now I'm not saying the building was old where y'all moved
into that building.
But I want to see something up there on 27 because that's
where we have a lot of our businesses.
Uh, speaking of the hospitals, somebody had a gun.
Are you saying different from the area that's on 27 now?
Different from power line.
Approved power line.
But something needs to be up there on 27.
Let's not forget it.
The plan is to keep 27 again as a substation.
That comes with the reward.
That will bring us more officers as well.
There will be some detectives.
There will be some detectives.
There will be some folks as well.
Now remember, as you said, the gold officers don't work out
a station.
They work out a different home body.
And we want them to be out on the road and road men
preventing crimes from the curb.
Now you said you want additional friends, stay tuned.
Because we intend to ask for additional resources.
Not because we want to.
It's because, most of the day, quite frankly, I'm new here
and looking at the population and what we should have.
We're behind because we have max laws as they should in the
last five years.
So we're asking for some to really justify more if we get
to serve them.
Thank you.
Okay, good.
Thank you.
That's it.
Thank you.
Vice Mayor.
Thank you.
One additional question for the police patrol vehicles.
How many vehicles are you looking to purchase?
Because I don't show that here.
On that one, it says 10.
And that was actually was implemented before I actually got
to see what we do.
We need those.
And it's, you're talking mileage on old vehicles.
So we're looking to swap those out.
And also with that, we're looking to outfit all the
vehicles with decals and lights and everything.
That's just one of the things.
Okay, thank you.
And that was going to be my next question.
With this amount, the amount that you're asking, does that
entail for everything for outfitting the vehicles?
Yes, ma'am.
Or just the purchase?
Yes, ma'am.
To include the radios and everything else.
Okay, thank you.
Quickly again, Mr. Mayor, can I be recognized?
Thank you.
I understand a necessity for law enforcement and for public
safety.
But you know, public safety don't generate money for
municipalities.
You know, it's a cost.
Fire and police don't generate money.
What I'm looking at, if you look at it, I think it says $34
.5 million that go into public safety.
You know, and as we don't know the what is, what's going to
happen with the avalorm taxes.
You know, I know we want to get all the bells and whistles,
but we got to be face reality.
We may not be able to now.
You know, because to me, you know, you may look at parks
and rec and say they're not important to the police, but we
got to fix the rolls.
We still have a, we can't take our entire budget and put it
all in police and fire.
We'll love to, but they don't generate income.
It's a cost.
That's our biggest cost is police and fire.
34.5 million of this budget.
That's more than almost half of the whole budget.
So, and I know what, it's a one.
You got to understand, it's a difference between a one and
a need.
You know, I may want 15, 20 more officers.
Is there a need or that's just a one based on the stats.
You know, that's why I asked earlier, if you can come back,
give me some stats to see why we need this many officers.
Then we can justify that because we're in a crunch time now
that this commission got to figure out where they're going
to cut or where they're not going to cut.
Are they going to stand still for a little bit?
So we got to be, we have to be commissioned.
We got to be very careful on what we, decisions that we
make here because we have other departments that we got to
satisfy.
We can't, and I love to, I'm a former law enforcement
officer.
We can't, but the 34.5 million, that's just the total of
all the departments.
No, if you look at the blue, look at the blue dot on each
department.
It's blue.
You see the blue that's shaded?
And then the remainder of the other one, they color coded.
Right.
But if you take a look, there's a breakdown.
Right.
I'm looking at it.
Right.
So the 30, 34.5 million, that's everything for all the
departments for the total capital.
Because they don't get the base job.
Right.
Because they have the base job.
I understand what you're saying.
So, but, but, but the whole budget, you said that's 34
million.
The whole pie is 34.5 million.
Just for the capital.
Okay.
But how much is that?
Yeah.
That blue is law enforcement and public safety.
The blue is all law enforcement.
It's 24.
20 million.
Oh, 20, 20.
Yes.
So it's 20 million.
25, 95.
Correct.
25 million.
Okay.
I just want to.
I just want to go by the percentage.
It says it's 59%.
59.6.
Of the budget.
Of that 34.
See, that's what I'm saying.
That's over half of this whole budget.
And we got, we got public, we got public safety.
We got to keep pumping when they flush them toilets.
We got to make sure that stuff is still functioning.
I understand that we need police and fire, but we also need
that toilet to be working for people.
Certainly.
May I also add, I know you're, you're saying that it's a
one, but this request is definitely beyond all the people.
Beyond a one is definitely a need when we're looking at our
population.
Right.
Every thousand.
That's why I'm asking for some stats.
Give me something to show me.
I can tell you this right now.
For every thousand, we should have 2.3.
Okay.
And that's what I'm looking for.
We're looking at right now with the city, we're looking at
about 44,000.
We actually should be operating at a number of about 109.
Yeah.
Looking at a population growth for next year, about 47 feet
.
So we should be going up significantly with that number.
So now with our actual ask and request, we should be
requesting about 45 officers.
We're actually looking for 25.
Can y'all give us some, can y'all provide, I don't know if
they may not want it, but I'd like to see those numbers in
real time.
Can y'all send them to me?
I have it right now.
Yeah.
So the reality of this, while the request is looking at the
current population, it's going to be 109.
Currently we only have 64 officers.
Right.
I just didn't have that to look at.
That's what I'm saying to you.
I needed something to do to comparison to say, hey, this is
a need.
Right.
You know, I'm just going by phone number, but I don't know
the breakdown on why you need these.
That's my name.
And real quick, just a moment.
And while Chief is passing that information out, because we
don't know, we know they're going to be cut more than
likely coming in this upcoming budget.
So I think right now, the question you asked, are very well
structured there.
Because since we don't know it, while we do have these
funds available, I think it's important that we go ahead.
Number one, I think we need to assess whether it's being
deemed for our residents right now as far as the safety
goals or is it because of growth.
If we think about it, we know that the growth is still
going to come and may slow down.
So, but we're still going to have that growth.
We need to make sure that we're allocating the funds for it
while we do that.
And Commissioner Huffman, you may break it.
Thank you.
I just want to say that I believe, Commissioner West, that
if we were able to have an accurate poll of some sort,
I want to say what is important from our constituents to
say what's important that public safety is going to be
number one.
No doubt.
It's going to be number one.
And we need to prepare for that now.
Yes, I want my toilet to flush.
Yes, I'd like to be able to take my grandchildren to the
park.
And I'm not downplaying any of it.
But I believe that if we were able to get an accurate
number from the constituents, public safety is going to be
the number one thing that they ask for.
And we need to provide that for them.
So, Chief, I did have one question.
So, I know when you provide us with an in-depth report at
our last meeting, the question was asked,
so with the actual number of officers that you need to, as
we'll say before this happened, this number of residents
that we do have, what is a true percentage in comparison to
what we have right now?
We're significantly down.
I can't percentage wise, but we should be right now.
We're allowed it.
We're allocated for 64 officers.
We should be operating at one on one with the population
that we have.
And just to clarify that, I'm glad you did that.
We should operate at one on one.
It is projected.
I got it from the city clerk that we're going up to 47, 800
.
So, from that one on one, we should go up to one on nine.
So again, we're significantly behind where we should be
asking for about 45 officers, but we're asking for 25.
Try to get that number up and also save the city a little
bit of money on the budget side.
If you look at what I gave you guys asking for those 45
officers, we'll be looking at about 6.4.
I don't have that in front of me.
I gave it to you guys.
We should be going to cost the city about 6.4 million.
Now we cut that in half.
We're looking at 25 officers.
We kind of almost cut that in half by 55.5% asking for the
25 officers.
So I think this is a big, big need.
Not just a request.
It's a big need if we want to bring our police department
up to part with what the city is doing as far as growth and
expansion.
I think this is not just a request.
It's a need.
Okay.
Thank you for that.
And then just one follow-up question.
And then when we're talking about these vehicles, the 10
vehicles that you're talking about, I do understand the
request for how many of you were there.
Is this to replace or is this just to make sure we have the
inventory there so we can hire these all?
This actual request is to replace vehicles that we have now
.
The request for the 25 officers, there's a different
request for vehicles as well.
And I think we can, again, make that work with a different
request.
Not as far as asking for 25 if it was maybe 15 to another
10.
I think we can make that work.
So, thanks.
Thank you.
And my one last question is, you've got to understand this
finance here.
You know, when you add law enforcement officers, it is just
not adding them.
You have to understand from a financial standpoint that you
've got to pay for them.
Yes, sir.
So, you've got 10 officers, you know, you've got to pay all
the, everything, you know.
So, you can probably tell how much that's going to cost us
with the 10 officers, you know, instead of, you know, just
hiring them.
Then that's another amount that we have to pay.
But it's very expensive for a police officer, whether you
know them.
I can tell you, to bring in one officer, it will cost the
city $142,814.
Okay.
So, how many do you anticipate you want to bring on?
I request 25.
25.
You have to add that in as well, you know.
So, we've got to look at that amount.
That's in that report.
Yeah, I'm looking at it now.
That's what I'm saying.
So, it's just, it's more than just, you know, we're going
to hire police officers.
It's a lot more goals with that.
Because their pension and all of that is involved.
And I just want to bring that up.
Vice Mayor, you have it.
Okay, Commissioner.
Yes.
I would just like to say to the Director of Public Safety,
for the police,
for the police department.
I got quite a bit of feedback from the last meeting when
the chief gave great reports, letting us know that whatever
types of crimes it was that we were at 1% or 3% out of 100
%.
And the feedback that I got was, if we're so safe, why do
we leave so many officers?
I think that's a big question.
While our folks are working very hard and diligent and
being primed down, they're working at high school.
How long do you continue to work at great?
And, you know, we all really have the top staff, the top
staff, as we put it in the officers.
And we're going to be doing this issue.
We're going to be doing this issue.
That's what we put our resources.
Quite frankly, that's the reason why we've been able to do
what we're doing.
Otherwise, we did traditional policing and it wouldn't work
.
And so we're having to do some things different, even from
our perspective, in the effort to do it.
One is we're hiring a crime analyst who will work with the
scarce office to give us more real-time things so that we
're not waiting a week.
Not waiting a month, you know, because the private space is
just to follow up.
No, it's going to be real-time.
As a crime is occurring, we're going to look at the data
and maybe the bar reach one.
It's top.
If they've committed one, that's one crime to commit.
You know, and so, but yeah, we're proud about those numbers
.
But there's some other things, like, for instance, homicide
.
We have four detectives.
I don't know if you can see it.
We have a hundred percent criminal homicide.
We have a homicide and studies have shown that if you've
deployed a lot of resources within the first 48 hours,
the chances of solvability of that homicide is very great.
Four people.
That's unreal.
They're working homicides.
They're working sexual batteries.
They're working burglaries.
They're working with men.
They're working with men.
And we think that they're doing a such a good thing.
They are.
But the reality is that I know there's something that we're
going to deserve.
That's why we need additional resources in OTA.
You know, now we were able to go back.
We got a lot of experiences on the side.
And we saw them on the side that happened here.
I don't know.
But I can tell you that had we had the adequate resources
at the time.
That should have been solved here.
Well, thank you.
I'm just saying that when the chief said we only have 1% of
this and 3% of that, that people that were watching the
screaming was saying that if we're that low, they're not
thinking about what you just said.
So when the chief comes back, like it's nice he's giving
this to us.
I hope it's on our website so that the residents can see.
And you've just explained how less of a detective that you
have.
And now the people streaming in hopefully will not message
me on Facebook to say if we're that safe, why do we need
extra offers?
I support extra offers.
Thank you.
One quick follow-up question, Chief.
Those stats, the percentages that you gave, those were to
show that there was an increase or a decrease, right?
From that month of last year to this month.
Right.
Just comparing months.
So it wasn't to state that we only had 1% of the price, it
was just showing a decrease from the year you had.
Okay.
Mr. Mayor, may I recognize?
You may.
Okay, one additional question, going back to the vehicles
because I don't see it here.
And I know we're talking about money and we need to be very
careful with it moving forward.
And I know we're looking at some cuts.
So what type of vehicles are we looking to purchase?
And I say that now because I said it again last year.
I said it first last year in the same bunch workshop.
Are we looking to purchase a $40,000 vehicle or are we
looking to purchase $80,000 vehicles?
Because that makes a big difference.
I know now we have some of the bigger utility like Tahoe's
and Yukon's and things of that nature just riding around.
Now, we're, yeah, the city looks good, but, you know, we
really need to focus on what we're spending.
So are we looking to do more like smaller patrol cars like
what they currently have?
I don't know if the chargers are still in or not now.
But are we looking to go to more of those, more bigger SUVs
because that's more maintenance, that's more gas.
So what are we looking to purchase?
So what we're actually looking for is, and when you look at
the capital project, it shows like Explorer Tahoe.
But we're looking at the FSA and usually we go at the
lowest price, whatever is the lowest price vehicle now.
What we usually do is piggyback off who has the lowest
price.
So if the sheriff's office is going with Tahoe's and they
got the lowest price due to the FSA, that's what we would
go in.
It could be a Ford Explorer, whatever the lowest price
vehicle.
So if the Ford State contract does what we would go in.
And then just kind of follow up on that, most recently the
Ford Explorers were running about 35,000, which was a
really good price when you compare it.
And it was cheaper than what Dodge was offering up on the
cargers.
So if you go forward, the Ford's going to be a good price,
and the Ford's going to be a good price.
So if you go forward, the Ford's going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
And then you're going to be a good price.
I'm going to make a joke with the public safety director.
I hope that these new cars can catch you all.
If not, we might as well go home.
Thank you.
No questions.
Real quick, Mayor.
I just want to, again, kind of put this in perspective.
And again, not negating anything that's been said.
I just, again, try to give you guys the framework.
In your packet, there's this page with red numbers at the
bottom.
That includes all the capital requests.
Right behind it is what I'm showing on the screen in black
numbers.
And that eliminates all the capital requests.
And I'm just showing you this as a perspective for the
general fund.
With no capital, we have about $5 million in funds
available for capital expenses.
With the 25 officers, as an example, I'm not saying, again,
not needed, not needed.
That's not the intent.
But the number is $3.7 million, which would come out of
that, which would leave you with $2 million for capital.
Which basically means, right, we're not even having a
capital conversation going forward, even before we set in
the $8 million loss.
So, again, I'm just giving you this information so you can
kind of analyze.
We're looking at operating eventually, which will be part
of that $4 million request.
But there's only $5 million on the table.
Again, past practice, we've usually set aside 10% of the
budget for capital because, again, roads need paving.
Projects need to be done.
Repair and maintenance on.
IT equipment.
Vehicles need to be replaced.
So, I'm just trying to give you guys enough information to
say what we're up against.
Not only this year from an operational standpoint.
Again, the need is there.
But the funding is also going away.
And we're going to have to wrestle with that.
So, just wanted to put that in perspective of what's
currently available.
And this includes the $2 million increase for Avalor.
So, you're saying how much in capital do we actually have
for police?
This is no capital.
And we have $5 million in the general fund to spend.
Not including new positions yet.
$5 million.
So, if we approve all the new positions as a hypothetical.
How much is that total?
$3.7 million.
Out of the $5 million.
Correct.
So, then we only have about how much remaining?
$2.7 million.
Correct.
And that's before we talk about fire, before we talk about
parks and rec.
Right.
So, if we approve all new positions, there is no capital
conversation.
So, again, I'm not saying that you guys are going to do
that.
I'm just trying to give what's available from a funding
standpoint.
How we wrestle with balancing the need operationally and
capital at the same time.
Because you cannot.
And that was my concern.
I'd love to give them all the bells and whistles.
But we've got to consider.
We just said one department.
We've got to worry about all the others.
The city still has to operate.
Right.
You know, then we do that.
We only $2.7 million left.
We've got to spread that amount.
Right.
With the other eight departments or nine high-mortem we
have here in the city.
Right.
That's my concern.
It ain't that I don't want to do it.
Right.
It's just that the budget don't allow us to do it.
It's definitely understandable.
Yeah.
It's just that it won't allow us to do it.
We're going to, you'll get something, but we may not be
able to get you 10, but we've
got to be able to operate.
Our job as the charter said, we've got to be responsible
for taxpayers' dollars.
That's right.
And we've got to be mindful of that.
You know, not that we, I don't want y'all to take it
personal that we don't want to do
it.
Because I come from a police background, but now I sit in a
different seat and I have to
look at it from a different perspective.
And I understand the response time.
You know, you want 10, you may have to get five.
We may not be able to do it right now because we have to be
responsible for the entire budget.
Right.
We understand that.
Today, I mean, we're just going to bring awareness.
Yeah.
And then, you know, others, you do a good job.
Okay.
I ain't going to be really cool.
But the understanding, if we go forward, it's still going
to be replaced.
We understand that.
Oh, absolutely.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's no doubt.
Yeah.
And then, and thank you for that.
But I also think as we do move forward, I think just a
couple things we need to do.
We do need to think about it in respect to these projects.
You know, are they broken?
You know, is it all the need that we have right now from
this plan?
And I think that's what we need to kind of just take into
consideration.
Is it mandated that we got to do right over the project
right now?
Okay.
Understood.
So just moving along, page 20 of the capital.
Hold on.
Do we need to take any action on this?
Right now, this is just you guys getting information with
all the capitals.
Again, if you guys want to cut something right away, we're
ready to do that.
If you guys want to say, hey, table it or approved, we're
also willing to take notes.
But this is just informative for you guys as we wrestle
through this process.
Okay.
All right.
I'm good.
We could jump to fire, but I was just going to go.
The table of contents has it in order 20 and then 22.
I don't know if that makes it easier as we just flip
through the book.
So jumping to page 20, that's the city administration
department.
There's one request this year for $60,000.
Thank you guys.
This is page 20 and 21.
It says administrative vehicle $60,000.
This is in preparation or forecast of a city manager
employment contract.
That's currently up in the air.
But that employment contract typically has a beer.
It's about page 20 right here.
Page 20.
It's 21.
It's 21.
Why don't we skip 12?
Where's 12?
You have a downtown parking garage.
12 is just a summary.
It's just listing all the departments, but eventually we'll
get to the downtown parking
and table of contents.
But why aren't we skipping now?
Those are just summary pages.
So we're actually going to the request in order, but that's
just a summary.
So that shows you probably safety downtown, but I was just,
if it's easier, we can just
go.
And why did we do police?
I know I was trying to do it in that order by department,
but now I think because that
starts at 165, 166.
So again, just trying to make it easier for everyone.
But we can, again, if you guys want to do it that way, we
can do it that way as well.
And go parking garage.
So are we not following the order based on page 12, like
police department, developmental
service, fire department?
So for police department, we can.
So police department pages were 165, 166.
If you guys are fine, jump into 165, 166, depending on that
listing.
We can do it that way as well.
We have the numbers.
Yeah.
I agree with the commission.
I think this is important to me.
It's just a follow-up.
Okay.
Okay.
Well, the downtown parking.
And I can check it out.
No, no, we've already talked.
Okay.
So the downtown parking garage is on page 25.
We can jump to that one next.
That's right.
That request is the parking garage to go alongside the
annex building.
Part of that is the current annex building is funded by
building excess reserves.
Right now we have about $13 million in excess funds in that
account, which covers the construction
of the actual building.
As part of that project, we also took out a $10 million
loan.
So this would be funded as part of that project for the
annex parking garage.
Again, based on a four story estimate, it was estimated to
be about $5 million to do the
parking garage downtown.
So again, no impact to the general fund.
It would come from that loan that was taken for the annex
project.
What about the permit?
The permit fund is going completely for the construction of
the building.
But isn't that where development services made their money
to be able to have that annex?
And I thought the parking garage was a dead issue.
I did too.
I did too.
You did too?
Yeah, I thought it was a dead issue.
I don't know why it's a back issue.
Well, if you want to go ahead.
Sure.
So the parking garage originally, the issue with the
parking in general was that we had an
agreement with Beltram to take up half of the plate, half
of that parking lot.
But now we have the whole parking area.
And originally, when I came over here, the plan was to use
that half area for a parking garage, because
we don't have enough parking downtown in general.
The problem was it was easy to see that it was insufficient
space to get a real parking garage on that half of a lot.
So we talked with Beltram and they agreed to take
properties off of 9th Street, I believe.
And in exchange, we got that property back, got the whole
parking area back.
And the thought is that we can still use funds that are
coming in from the building department to help construction
of the garage or use it for the annex.
And we also had a $10 million loan with the annex as well.
So nothing's coming out of general fund for that, but it
helped increase parking for downtown in general if we do
that area.
We had talked or I had specifically talked with one
architect and he had said they wouldn't even be interested
in doing bidding on a job that was half of that parking
area because he said basically you can get little minis in
there, but nothing else in there.
You said this is not coming out of the general fund.
Correct.
It's coming out of permits and fees and all.
Correct.
The permits and fees are going to pay for the building and
we also had a $10 million loan as part of that.
So that some of that money would be used towards building
building of the garage.
Has this loan operated approved by this commission?
Yes.
Yes.
I just don't see where we need to have a downtown parking
garage.
The space that we have, you can make parking spaces out of
it.
It still puts the employees and any of the contractors or
whoever, I don't know who I was going over there, but
closer to the building versus parking right out of time
here of city halls.
So that to me, that's, I just don't see a need for parking
garage.
Thank you for that.
Thank you for that, Commissioner.
I have a different view on that.
I think grossly, we just don't have enough parking.
If there's an event here right now, we have employees
parked a couple blocks away to make sure our residents that
visit our facility have somewhere to park.
I think this solves not only the employee issue, but I
think anytime we have something downtown, I think it's a
need.
I know in my experience in trying to have businesses and in
the process of people to try to have businesses downtown.
The one thing that they often say when they ride through
the downtown here, just looking at traffic, there's
absolutely nowhere to park.
I think this solves a lot of that and we can try to reinv
igorate like that.
And Mayor Smith.
Yes.
I agree with you that there's not enough parking.
We've torn down the old TV thing.
We haven't done anything to it.
So evidently, staff doesn't feel that there is a need to
turn that into parking spaces until they find out about the
sun rail that's going to be there.
But $6 million, $5 million, I just think.
Mr. Mayor, can I be recognized?
Thank you for that, Commissioner Hoffman.
You know, if you think about it, and I'm not against the
parking garage, but if you think about it, if you look
across the TSA's tracks there,
we own land that's across from the cigar quarters and I don
't know how many acres.
We bought that land for parking.
You know, and that land goes next to Hainsey to CGA, it
goes all the way down to the bottom of that hill.
You know, that is for parking.
The boys' TV, we got that for parking.
That was all to get the sun rail here.
You know, but I still think that there may not be enough
parking based on the projection that we're looking at in
years.
And you're talking 70-some thousand people.
The problem that I have is that, you know, really we don't
have enough businesses downtown to attract all of them.
But I can see on every other Thursday, if there is an event
that's something on our agenda, I have a hard time finding.
We had to, you know, the proof is in the pudding.
We had to identify locations.
I see the whole, but it's commissioning, can park.
And we couldn't find no parking.
But parking is an issue, whether it's a parking garage or
add an additional parking someplace.
Downtown parking is a concern with me.
And I'm not against, you know, if it's not coming out of
our general fund, if it's coming out of the, you know,
different revenue stream, then we can do it.
But I just don't want to take it out of the, if it had to
come out of the general fund, I'd be totally against that.
But being that it's not coming out of general fund, I think
that money can only be put back in proceedings like this
that are coming out of that parking, correct?
Correct.
You know, you can't take that money and do something
totally different.
So we can't, it's in there.
It has to be used for the building department.
That's what I'm saying.
It has to be used for that.
So let's take advantage of it, you know.
That's what it has to be used for.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Mr. Duff.
Yes.
Just what he said in regards to what we own across from the
cigar bar, you said.
Are we going to turn that into parking spaces?
But if not, we really need to look into having the parking
garage.
Only because we're trying to be a place of a destination.
We have to project those things.
And I understand what you're saying about the monies that
we're spending to do so.
But how can we be a walkable downtown, a walkable community
if we don't put it there?
And I come down here for my nails, hair, and everything.
And I have to circle the blocks for at least 10 to 15
minutes just to find somewhere to park.
And then when I do park, it's far.
It's far away.
So I do understand what you guys are saying.
And I'm conservative as well.
But we have to think futuristically.
Because I'd hate for us to see that we need this and we don
't even have it.
That's my whole thing.
But if you're saying we can have parking spaces.
Then we have to forget the safety of people crossing the
railroad tracks and trying to walk downtown as well.
But I think that should already be in a phase to turn that
portion of land into parking spaces for those businesses
that sit right there now.
Which is the cigarette corner.
And again, if I was a business owner, I'm going to look at
if they have a parking garage.
Do you have parking spaces?
Because I can't sit there and fight every day for my
patrons to come to my business.
We don't have it.
So they're looking at all of that.
So you said we don't have the businesses.
That's one of the reasons why they're not going to come up
if we don't have things that are simple for them.
Right.
And then Citrus Connection has mobile golf carts and things
that they will bring, but we have to show why we need it as
well.
But that's it.
Thank you.
Ms. Mayor.
Thank you, Ms. Mayor.
I think I agree with everyone.
But for me, it's like if it's a need and really not just a
want.
So, although it's not coming out of the general fund, we
still have to look at though with the loan that's creating
debt.
So there's a lot of things that we still need to take into
consideration.
We do have property that we've owned.
We've identified those properties.
We were in talk before about making those locations and
turning it into additional parking just for the downtown.
You know, I don't know if it was just a thought because we
talked about it and then it went away and it never came
back up.
So I would be more so in favor to see what we could utilize
now what we currently have versus just saying,
okay, yes, let's spend $5.25 million on a parking garage.
I think the garage itself is more of a want than a need.
I know we wanted it at one point.
We were all excited when it was coming and then it just
fell through for whatever reason.
So I know we're just in discussions now.
So for me, I would rather for us to really look at what's a
real want, a need versus just what we want.
And just because this is just conversation discussion, one
of our internal conversation has been obviously this would
come back.
It's a $5 million project.
We'd have to bid it and go through that process.
Right.
I think phase one, if we leave it in there again, there's
no general fund impact.
We can go ahead and start some design planning.
Part of us, as we've talked about Lakeland and different
parking garages in different cities where there's a mixed
use component to it retail down at the bottom level.
Again, is that feasible?
I can't tell you today that that is, but being able to do a
conceptual for you guys to say, yes, it's not only parking,
but now it's revitalizing and bringing some more retail
businesses.
Part of the conversation we've had internally is does the
city want to be in that position to manage and house the
retail components of it?
From my perspective, I don't love it.
That's something that we can do.
Obviously, CRA also has a component downtown that could be
incorporated into that.
So just bringing this as just conversation of consideration
that we could continue to move forward and, you know, six
months from now, eight months from now, you can still
decide.
And we don't want to move forward based on the conceptual
at that point.
A quick information about the space.
How many levels are we talking about?
You said parking.
You're talking.
Yeah, originally, I was proposed that forward kind of to
match the annex building.
So it kind of looks seamless going across.
I think four levels is pretty high.
You know, I mean, I just, you know, you're going to do it.
Why couldn't you do just two levels?
And we can bring it cheaper.
You know, it wouldn't be that.
It wouldn't cost that five million dollars.
It'll be a lot more cheaper to do two levels.
And I remember parking it just said, why four levels to
match the Andrew, uh, Brett Riley building?
I remember during the conversation on the annex, there was
a count that was done by the engineer of how many positions
would be going to the annex for employees, but then
creating enough parking for potential residents.
And there is a position count and parking count for.
But that's when we was going to build a condos down.
Are the condos still coming in the downtown?
No, that's why it was four levels because there was going
to be condos and that was for the parking for the country.
We did a way with the condos.
So why would we still need a four level parking?
And that's what we were saying.
If we do retail on the bottom, let's say, you know,
restaurants, then that may create additional need for
parking.
But again, that's all depending on what you guys want to
see at this location.
And if I can add, I think what we don't want to do is do
something not thinking about the road, right?
We want businesses to come downtown.
We want to make someone come with this vibe.
I think when you talk about just two levels, when you have
a mixture of compact cars to large vehicles, you can grasp
the limit of what we can do in an almost be kind of just
waste.
And Mr. Mayor, for me.
Yes.
And also on the Bowen property and property across the
street, the Bowen property obviously is still having the
Brownfield study completed, which is obviously a time
consuming process.
We don't know whether it's going to uncover, but the plan
is to request that the board allow CRA money to do design
for the parking area that we think we could incorporate,
not just that property, but the street there, right by
railroad.
And then the property across the road so that it's useful
today and going into the future of Sunrail and income.
So it is possible, I mean, to get that done based on the
timeline of Brownsville and then prepare the parking
surface over here so that in the future we could design it
so that it's easier to build a parking garage if we don't
want to do it today.
Well, why can't we use the same funds from the planning,
but we use it for the parking garage for the Bois TV
property?
That's what that money is worth.
Why would we take it out of CRA?
CRA can be used for a better purpose.
And that money is, that can be used for that.
We're doing it for the parking garage.
Why couldn't we do it for the parking and the Bois TV?
I think right now just again building reserve funds are
just so restrictive based on that statute.
I think putting that parking garage right next to the
building seamless makes sense, easy argument.
Putting it halfway across downtown.
It's not doing about maybe three.
Again, I'm not saying it's not doable.
It's just trying to keep it with it.
Part of the structure, part of the need.
It's just that we seem like we're up here that we go to CRA
funds for everything, you know, and we're going to deplete
that funds a little later.
We're going to go to everything.
Everything is all right.
Go to CRA and get it out of there.
Yeah, and CRA, and we need to also keep in mind that CRA
funds is just the same as the building fund.
We cannot do everything out of CRA.
It's restrictive as well.
We cannot use CRA funding, none of CRA funding to house any
, like, thing dealing with employees.
That's not what CRA is for.
Right.
So if we're looking to build this parking garage for the
building department to part there, then CRA funds is off
the table.
Right.
Because we cannot use that for that purpose.
So just like other things are restricted, CRA has even more
restrictions than the norm.
Yeah, for sure.
We would only look at CRA if that retail component, because
now we're trying to drive revitalization, economic
development downtown.
But if that piece goes away, you're absolutely correct,
then it wouldn't even be a funding option that we would
consider.
And again, downtown CRA is only $370,000.
So it's not like we would be picking up a large tab of the
parking garage.
Just throw that out there for conversation, because it
could be something that the CRA wants to be a part of.
Again, marketing, trying to bring businesses downtown.
I could see that collaboration coming into play if we went
in that direction.
Mayor Smith.
Go ahead.
I agree with Vice Mayor Downing.
And, you know, I don't want to say too much, because I don
't know who else streams in here.
But the businesses that are used more are on the bottom of
6th Street.
So maybe we need to look on 7th Street to see if there's
any property that perhaps we can purchase that is going to
be more of an asset to the 6th Street businesses.
Because putting this parking garage on 7th Street in the
business you want to get to is at the bottom of 6th Street.
You really haven't done any asset or favors or whatever to
the residents that are there.
The ones that are going to utilize that are going to be the
Central Florida Health Care that sits there on Ingram and
city employees.
And as the Vice Mayor stated, you can't use CRA dollars for
that.
So take a look at 7th Street because that's going to be
more of a need and a location for the businesses down there
.
There's more businesses down there than there are on Ingram
.
And just to that point, this was probably about a year ago,
I was working with Deputy City Manager King to have some
talk on some of the properties in that area.
Right now, it's somewhat of a King's ransom.
It's the current prices that they're asking.
It may not make financials.
But Commissioner Johnson?
Yeah, there's definitely restrictions using the CRA dollars
.
But there is a program CRA Fort Myers has that does public
parking lot.
There's a public parking lot program that they use.
And they do a buy-in with the other businesses in regards
to that.
I think CRA was part of the parking lot that's over here in
Miami where the barbershop is.
Yeah.
They're part of that little thing right there.
And so there is a program if you guys want to look it up.
And we can definitely let our CRA know that CRA Fort Myers
does a public parking lot program.
But they put the other businesses and the businesses have
buy-ins as well.
I just want to throw that out there.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I just want to say that I don't know what the King's grave
is for 7th Street.
But if it's more than $5 million, if it's less than that,
then that's something to look at.
And I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
I think that's a big deal.
Good morning, commissioners.
So with that tower platform, that is a replacement.
So we have a unit right now.
It's 2016.
As we discussed last week, the build times for the aerial
trucks are three years.
So we're doing some proactive planning with this one.
The current unit has.
It's 50,000 plus miles on it.
We have begun to experience a few different mechanical
issues with that.
Nothing that can be corrected.
But again, we're trying to fund half of that truck this
year, half next year in order to receive that truck by 2031
.
So.
Have we ever at one time we was able to get some financial
help with grants?
Have we ever, have we applied for any of the grants since
we got those last?
So with, with those grants, the only, um, grants that
really would apply for us for apparatus would be the state
money.
Um, and we have been successful in the past.
I know we did get trip two vehicles, um, over the last few
years.
Um, we had some federal funds too at one time.
So with the federal funds, um, we, we are applying this
year.
We're actually about to submit a grant for 225,000 for
equipment, um, which would help offset the cost for the
operating.
Um, again, we won't find out until next year if we're
successful.
So, um, with the apparatus, they are very, uh, it's a very
competitive process to get that.
Usually they're looking at vehicles under 25 to 30 years
plus.
Um, again, we wouldn't qualify for that and our vehicles
would never make 20 years.
Um, we're lucky to get 15 years or even 10 years with the
amount of call volume we're proceeding for the last few
years.
So, and we did put in for a tower truck, um, this past, um,
a few months ago.
I think I got some of the letters from you, you all, um,
but we wrote it to the test.
And we also, um, took it to the state, um, last or year
before last asked for funding and the legislature approved
it, but the governor did not approve it.
That was two years ago.
Yes.
Mary Smith.
Oh, you made a break.
Correct.
When you all go to, um, the Polk County days or you go to T
allahassee, is our lobbyist up there?
Yes.
Yes.
And so they're lobbying as well to help us to get, uh,
whatever they're called it.
Um, well, hold on, Commissioner.
The only lobbying or what the appropriation that we give
them to lobby for us, and we don't give them appropriation
for lobby for a fire something.
They don't lobby for that.
You know, we've been having them use for what, uh, uh, uh,
public, uh, no, for, uh, for James Keene.
Yeah.
That's the only thing that they've been lobbying for.
And I think that's what the problem is for public works.
But the waste water, that's what we get.
We did receive money.
We just got, I would, I told you a lot we got the other day
.
I was, I told you two points on me.
Uh, James, I told you right.
But we didn't lobby for fire.
And that's why, you know, but we need to, and that's what
we need to do when we go up there again.
It's an important fire.
It's expensive.
Those apparatus is not cheap.
And with the, you know, you've seen the buildings that are
growing up right higher and higher.
Um, so those are more important now more than ever.
Um, you know, it might be a 95 foot platform, but by the
time you park away from the building, 95 feet, it's taken
up very fast.
Um, but in order to get those three and four story, five
story elevated, um, windows or, or openings, um, to make
the rescue if need be.
So, or if you have somebody working on, we've used them to
do roof rescues, uh, with workers or, you know, cross the
street here.
Um, you know, you, you know, you get to the point that you
may not be able to get your equipment up through stairwells
or elevators.
Well, Cody, when you get to your, um, water tank and your,
um, boat thing behind the police department, let me know.
Cause I, I don't know who is with this.
Okay.
Do you want me to tell you why?
Yes, ma'am.
Okay.
Um, because one, I don't think that it is, um, able to
handle the new growth and the new commercial business that
is there.
Right.
I don't know anything about the fire except I want you to
put it out.
Right.
Um, but you have a lot of new, uh, developments that is on
Oak Oak City Road, um, that is Grander Ridge, Chandler
Ridge.
I think the other one is West Ridge, uh, and, and to expect
this pinker or whatever to get there before your engine can
get there from Main Street.
What really can they do?
And the last time I was there, you had a little boat and I
don't know, it looks like only one person can fit in it.
If you were trying to go to one of the lakes that, um, are
back there, um, um, the one that is, um, behind the new
hammock estate or whatever.
It just seems that, uh, it's inadequate to be a starter
until the engine comes.
So I, I'd like to see if it's not on here or definitely
next year to do something that something better than what
we have, um, to be able to, you know, start something until
you can get to Main Street.
Um, um, um, to be able to assist it.
There's a lot of growth that has taken place down there.
Um, and that's where our main commercial buildings, um, are
.
So I don't know who thought of that.
I can't even call it a trailer from what I saw back there.
It did serve a purpose.
Um, we've been there over 10 years now.
Um, it's starting to have some wear and tear like normal.
Um, we definitely have our, our use out of it.
Um, you have your use now?
Um, we're making it work.
Um, I think with, you know, added personnel, we are limited
.
We'd like to put another unit out of there, uh,
specifically a rescue vehicle, uh, to reduce that wear and
tear on the bigger apparatus.
Um, but we're, again, we, we only have facilities for three
, three members.
But you're saying a bigger apparatus you're talking about.
So.
Talk to me in late times.
So, so we have the fire engine there right now and we can
only, uh, staff three people out of that building.
There's only three bedrooms.
Um, we would like to, eventually we would do have a brick
and mortar building to add a, a, a, a little pickup truck
rescue with two people.
Um, and in, in order for them to handle the majority of
those rescue incidents that we were using the fire engine
for fires and rescues, things like that.
So you no longer have the truck with the water.
The brush truck.
On the back.
Um, is it, you talking about the little brush truck?
I guess that's what it is.
We do, we do have a brush truck.
Cause when I went there, that's all I saw.
Right.
That was back there.
And I just did not feel that it was enough to get started
on trying to put out a fire until your.
Regular fire truck.
You must be speaking of the mini pumper.
It was a smaller.
Right. Yeah.
And that was an engine.
Um, it was a different type of engine.
Plastication.
Um, yeah, for a frontline, um, unit that, that would be, um
, you would have to have other resources around it.
Like you said, to be protected appropriately.
Um, right now we do have a fire engine pumper.
Uh, that is, that is, um, um, optimal.
And, uh, officially once we do to get that, that building,
uh, facility, we would add a rescue vehicle to supplement
the personnel and to add that rescue opponent.
So you'll still be there even when the police, um, leaves,
um, or downsides is there.
Correct.
So we're going to be able to, um, to, um, to, um, to, um,
we just need to make sure because the area has really grown
.
And with this new super target to hotels, restaurant, uh,
and all of that, is that going to be sufficient to be able
to at least start putting something out until you can get
more, you know, fire trucks there.
Right. Yeah. Um, right now it is sufficient for fire
coverage.
So we have a pumper that covers that zone.
So.
Okay.
Thank you.
Yes.
Thank you.
Mr. Mayor.
Um, question chief.
Um, is it just the standard practice?
Because I see like all the vehicles is roughly around the
50,000 mile mark, um, for the replacement, um, on those
fields.
Right.
So traditionally, we have a lot of people that are not
going to be able to do that.
Um, we have a lot of people that are not going to be able
to do that.
Um, we have a lot of people that are not going to be able
to do that.
Um, we have a lot of people that are not going to be able
to do that.
Um, we have a lot of people that are not going to be able
to do that.
Right.
So traditionally, um, aerial trucks are around that 15 year
mark, which that tower truck is at that.
Once we receive delivery in that 2031, 2030 timeframe, it
'll be about 15 years.
Um, fire engines are approximately 10 years.
Uh, but again, that's all dependent on call volume.
So if you have a red light dart downtown, we run that
rescue unit.
We are looking to add a rescue up at the new station,
station three, and that's going to reduce and expand that
lifespan of those fire engines.
So station two right now is only running out of that fire
engine.
So they run everything in their zone.
And that, that three year old apparatus already has 50,000
plus miles.
So it kind of depends on the station zone and what
equipment supports that.
Okay.
Thank you.
Yes, ma'am.
I have one last question, Mayor.
Commissioner.
Do we, um, have, um, I don't know what you will call it,
but the agreement with Davenport and any other town.
Mutual aid.
What is it called?
Oh, mutual aid.
Um, with the other towns where, um, you would take our fire
engine to Davenport, Point Siena, Lake Hamilton.
And would you still have a fire engine in case while you're
helping somebody else that can also take care of something
that pops up in King City?
Yes, ma'am.
Um, so we are, we do have a mutual aid pact with the other,
uh, jurisdictions, but we also have an automatic aid
agreement with Holt County.
Um, so we basically every day they're either helping us or
we're helping them.
Depends on where the calls are.
Um, if for instance, we get a, our downtown station goes
over to Point Siena for a call, which happens periodically.
We bump up our other units to kind of roam that area.
If it's a Point Siena, that's the Osceola County.
Uh, you have a mutual aid with Osceola County.
So, uh, traditionally be the whole county jurisdiction that
, that covers that Point Siena, um, whether it's the north
or the south side of Point Siena.
Okay.
All right.
Thank you.
No other questions.
Okay.
A quick question, Mr. Mayor.
Okay.
On your admin vehicle that I think you want to replace for
yourself, what's the year and the mileage on that?
So, so with that admin request, that was for an operations
chief position we are asking for, and that would be a new
purchase.
For a new position?
Yes, sir.
No, I always short on, on vehicles like admin things.
So, yes, sir.
We were basically, um, we don't have any spare unit.
We do have one spare unit.
We are asking for a logistics captain, um, for this year as
well.
And that our one spare vehicle would go to that position.
Um, it's a 20.
It's the chance to be 20.
20?
No, it's 29.
Um, but yes, sir.
We, I'll give you an example right now.
Our battalion chief, you see that request as well.
That vehicle's out of service.
So, you know, we're asking for a logistics captain, um,
this year as well.
And that's the chance to be 20.
20?
No, it's 29.
Um, but yes, sir.
We, I'll give you an example right now.
Our battalion chief, you see that request as well.
That vehicle's out of service getting repaired.
Um, so they are in a 2015, uh, our reserve rescue, which is
, is very rough.
Um, so we're kind of, it's part of, uh, we're kind of
making do to shift the vehicles around
as needed.
Um, that battalion chief vehicle, if approved, would go to
frontline service.
And then that spare battalion vehicle would be used as a
battalion spare or a rescue spare
because it kind of, they're both big of trucks and toppers.
So if we had, if we had to cut something out of your budget
, you know, in the category,
what would be something that you, you can probably, you
know, live without or a, another budget
cycle if we, you know, have a minute.
Right.
So, so it's either these great big purchases because these
apparatus are very expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
Yeah.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
And then we're going to have to be more expensive.
So you're saying the tower truck that we can?
If need be, I think out of all these, you know, if we don't
get approved for these extra administrative positions that
we're looking for, then obviously we can cut those vehicles
.
And if we do get those approved, that would be those admin
vehicles.
But I think right now, I think if you take that tower and
just push it back another year, that would put it at about
that 16-year mark.
Yes.
Not saying that that's going to happen.
Right.
Just saying, you know, based on the time that we're living
in, that it could happen.
That's why I'm taking questions from you, okay?
That's just something that we need to keep in the
background of our minds.
If the finance said, hey, we've got to come on this
threshold because that's all we have to work with.
We've got to find out how we've got to make the work
together balance.
Yes, sir. Absolutely.
All right. Thank you.
Thank you.
And Chief, just one follow-up question.
When you talk about if something does have to be pushed to
power trouble, would be it?
That's taking into account when you said that would put it
in year 16.
That's because when you try to place these orders, it's
going to be a couple years.
Three years.
Yes, sir.
And that's the current production times.
Again, those costs do go up.
It's anywhere between $2.5 million, $2.7 million from the W
ulper gathering.
But, yeah, it's about three years in wait right now.
I don't anticipate that going up or down.
So.
Yeah, just.
All right.
Thank you.
Any other questions?
I just have one.
Over at hand.
I just have one.
Over at hand.
Because I don't understand when there's a call or say, I
don't know, just for the police to come that the fire
trucks come as well.
Why is that?
So it could be an assault.
So not only do you have that police component, but you have
a medical issue of victim.
So if we're there, it's because there was some type of
medical emergency that took place.
And in addition to that, there are some areas where you see
the problem is those people who are involved in the fire.
They have an axe.
They have an axe.
We don't have that many firefighters here.
They're the ones who go to jail.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
And if you see a staging, usually if it's an assault call,
we have to wait until law enforcement signatures that scene
.
You might see a staging a few blocks away.
That's it.
Right.
We don't want them to go run it up.
It's not fine.
Okay.
All right.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes, ma'am.
Yes, ma'am.
All right.
Any other questions on just the fire department?
Again, they've talked about the admin vehicle, Lucas device
, bunker gear, ballistic protection, and then extraction.
Would you like them to go to each one of those or are you
guys comfortable?
No, I'm good.
We don't have to do line item by line item.
For me, I mean, I would in the back of that's my question
about other items.
Yeah, go through the fire department.
Yeah, go through the fire department.
Go through the fire department.
No, I'm good.
Okay.
So we'll jump to the next department, which is other
general government.
I'm going to ask the IT TMD director, the infamous Mr. An
holm.
Infamous.
Yes.
Okay.
Okay.
So replacement program starts on page 77 all the way
through 98.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
So we're going, yeah, we're using the 12 page 12 guide by
departments and all the items going down that category and
then jump into the page.
But again, if you guys want to do it differently.
So my question is, so is the department only presenting one
item from their acts?
And then if the commission has other questions that's
listed.
And we're asking them that because I'm seeing that change.
Okay.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
Okay.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So we're going to go ahead and do that.
So the only reason why I asked because with that, it starts
like in our book, I guess.
Yeah, it's kind of mixed up.
That's why I was trying to make it easier.
And you said page 75, but that's not where I see IT starts
on 75.
So that's why I was asking.
Are they only presenting one item to us and then whatever
other questions we have for any additional items listed?
So, for example, this one's other general government on the
table of contents.
The software line item is page 90, which is that first item
.
So it's under general government, but it's IT related
software.
Okay.
So we've got a little bit of a mix between the table of
contents and that page 12.
Gotcha.
Okay.
So are we 75 or 90?
Well, actually we're on the other then, right?
We're on other general government, page 12.
Okay.
All right.
We're going to go down this list.
If there's one that you say, hey, let's talk about more
detail.
I'll reference that page and we can jump to it.
But I think for right now, let's just hold on page 12, that
table of contents, and you guys can make notes there and
then we'll jump to that page.
Okay.
So first one is software.
The request is $1,040,000.
Yes, this one's going to be quite loaded.
This originally was supposed to include the ADG cloud.
I'm sorry, Mr. Mayor.
What page?
Because we've heard three different pages.
Right now, we're going off page 13.
Correct.
No.
Which is the top right?
Yes.
Correct.
If you want to go to the actual information, we'll give you
the page reference going forward.
Just to make it simple, yes.
So what happens to the non-computer and related technology
equipment?
So you're saying that we have a question, we can go to that
line item page?
Correct.
Correct.
Correct.
Okay.
So we're just going to do the categories here.
We're going to go each line item item item within the
department.
Right.
Then we have a question, then we can go to that.
Exactly.
Do you know what page that we're storing on?
For example, for like a software?
Yeah, on the other general government.
Software specifically is number 90.
Page 90?
Yeah.
But if like PCs GG is page 85.
So again, table of contents is alphabetical ones.
I understand.
So they're all over the place.
Yes.
I got it.
Okay.
Yeah.
I just thought that I didn't go to another.
Okay.
Stop.
Okay.
All right.
Okay.
Ready?
So yeah, software.
This one again was intended to be ADG cloud component, $1,0
40,000.
ADG and LaserBish cloud, which is our records management
software.
ADG is actually a different project that we were already
working on and it somehow slipped past me on this one.
So this numbers can be extremely bloated and I'm still
waiting on the laser fish number though.
So we didn't want to actually change it to an estimated
number for that because they were trying to find our exact
services to match exactly what we would need before we get
it.
When he says ADG, I just want to specify too.
When he says ADG, I just want to specify too.
That's our internal program software, also known as ERP
that houses accounting payroll, HR, everything that's
operationally in the city is within this ADG software.
So part of the conversation has been trying to move
development services and upgrade our ERP software, which we
can go ADG, keep ADG and upgrade it to the cloud.
That's option A.
A full blown proposal would be going out to the market
again and bringing back.
I think the last time we brought that to the commission, it
was like a $2 million price tag to make that transition.
So again, part of that is part of this line item.
Again, is that the direction that the commission wants us
to continue to pursue to enhance our software and go more
electronic based?
Or do you guys want us to, again, just deal with what we
have and upgrade to the point necessary within a certain
reason?
Let me ask you this, and this may be a little bit brief, as
far as that price tag that you're talking about with the $2
million, I know that the initial setup is always going to
be a higher cost.
Is it going to be comparable to, I guess, the $1 million
range moving forward if we can go with something else?
Do you have any insight on that?
I think it depends on which platform we go.
ADG, I think the $1 million is sufficient.
I know, for example, we're looking at a sell-off for the
building department, which is separate.
But that one's got about a $700,000 price tag to implement
and then software costs.
So to your point, implementation, I think, is going to be
around $1 million one time and then ongoing $1 million
software cost is the expectation.
I guess it kind of boils down to, you know, moving forward
if what's going to give us the most bang for our buck.
Okay.
Okay.
Anybody got any questions based off the bat?
Go ahead.
And this is said, Mr. Mayor, 2027, that software program,
how often do we have to upgrade our software?
You know, is it every six months, every year, every two
years?
How often do we upgrade software?
So upgrades like this every 10 years, I would think is
expected, 10 plus.
So again, when we do these type of big transitions, it's
very labor intensive.
It's making sure every GL matches, boarding over
documentation and records from a financial standpoint to
make sure I can go back and look at 2020, 2021.
So again, very labor intensive.
Once you do this, you do it one time and you don't look
back for 10 years.
So the license is good for 10 years, what you're saying to
me, the software license, that's a long time for some
license on software for 10 years.
That's what the license is going to be for.
So typically, yeah, for ADG, for example, we do pay annual
licenses now, which is required just to, again, do updates
and keep the software in program compliance.
But yeah, right now, ADG, at least the current software is
very inexpensive, but again, it has limitations where it's
very manual and paper based, not electronic.
So, and one of the benefits of moving to the cloud based
system is they become, um, not reliable, responsible for
keeping those updates to the system, security patches, any
new features, anything like that.
And that's all included in that price, an annual price.
Well, how can it be secure in the cloud?
They're responsible for securing their data on their site,
essentially.
So they would put the extra money into hardening their
servers on that site, because the cloud is just based on
somebody else's keeping track of it, and then they can
essentially, you know, update and...
So the chances of getting hacked and getting all of our
information is what? What percentage that if it's in the
cloud?
That is a hard thing to say, because it's all going to be
dependent on the data center and the practices they have in
place already.
And, and, and...
But...
No.
With that said, we always have that risk here, too.
Right, right.
And that's my biggest concern.
That's what...
So, there's my back question.
Oh, go ahead.
For Jeremiah, I don't know what the GIS stands for, but is
this included in this one million companies?
The GIS is not included in this one.
GIS is Geographical Information Systems.
It's heavily used in public works utilities.
It's essentially like the location of our utilities
underground.
More, lately, it's been used for more public facing
information.
For example, like, we've been working with a vendor from
last year where they...
They're essentially mapping out all of our streets within
the city.
And they're creating like a public view portal where they
can say, this is the city street, or this is, this is the
county.
And it's someplace where the public can essentially go and
get that information.
So, the truckers will stop.
We can take our sign down to tell them that the, um, oh,
the street information is wrong and they need to make the
right to go down to the freezer company.
Does it replace that?
It would...
I'm not familiar enough with that one.
No, the...
Yeah, that one's based off Google, I think, is why they
have that sign there.
So, that wouldn't be based on ours.
So, for what you said, a customer would be able to do that?
I meant like citizens could go in there into the portal and
look up that information and stuff.
And it's not just limited to streets.
That's just the one we've been working on most recently.
So, in your budget, your capital expense, you don't have
anything that should be charged to public or public
utilities as in the past.
I just don't want to pay for it twice.
Mm-hmm.
Uh, the ones that we all have in here should all be based
under, shouldn't be moving for other departments.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Mr. Johnson.
Yes, it says replacement.
So, what we have now is not working for you.
Or have we used what we have now to its full advantage?
Essentially, that's what it is.
Essentially, that's what it is.
We've used it to its full extent.
Um, we try to replace things.
Typically, technology is about five-year cycles.
Because at that point, computers start getting old and it
will slow down.
And we can only take so many phone calls in a day saying my
computer is going slow.
But that's just part of maintenance, essentially, just to
make sure we're up and running with as little downtime as
possible.
Okay.
And we've shot this price around.
This is the lowest?
What would you tell me?
Uh, which one are we looking at specifically?
1,000,040,000?
Well, I'm --
This one, I imagine, will be lower than this.
Okay.
I imagine it will be lower.
But I don't have definitive numbers yet, so.
Okay.
Oh, thank you.
Um, and, Omar, I know you, you, you, you really touched on
that.
I guess this is still, I guess, a paper-based system.
Um, you know, from my seat, I would, I would really love us
to possibly explore, um, more of a, I guess, cloud-based,
you know, the next product system.
Yeah.
Um, if that's something, especially if it's a variable in
price, just to kind of move forward, so we can have that
seamless technology all the way through.
Yes.
Okay.
Does anybody else come in?
No, but you'll come back, uh, on a different avenue?
Yes, ma'am.
Project.
Okay.
Is this after other people?
Because I keep saying the same thing every year with IT or
TMD, where we're, we're at, we're replacing this at Myers-W
iley Field.
You know, we're doing this, we're doing that.
Yeah.
I mean, this is a nine month, you know, it's only good for
that time or whatever, or Windows.
Um, share of mine, come back.
So he's got, we've got general government, transportation
and IT department.
But like you said, if that one's under, if Myers-Wiley is
under Parks and Rec, it may be another department down the
road.
Uh, I don't know if there's any this year.
I don't know if there's any this year either, but typically
like our switch equipment and such access points for the
wireless and all that fun stuff is typically placed under
replacement program.
Uh, either network or wifi depending upon which one it is.
I probably won't be here at that time.
I have to leave Jeremiah and, um, Omar, but your, um,
internet connection at the, um, Oakland Auditorium and at
the Oakland Neighborhood Center does not always work.
And that's where we're sending kids to be able to be in the
parking lot to go online on their computer to be able to
finish their homework.
We've been talking about this almost as long as I've been
up here in 2017.
And it's been talked about, we've been approving the budget
and every year there's an issue.
It's not stable.
And I don't know, uh, maybe the vice mayor knows because
she goes to the, um, um, uh, Piler Enrichment Center where
it's not stable, um, at all.
And on the east side, you've been talking about doing
something over there.
And, um, um, the Larry Parish to allow the kids on the east
side to be able to have access to internet.
And I've been voting for that for years.
And it still comes up.
So, um, um, I'll be watching it on my cell phone on my way
to the doctor's appointment.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
And I'll be watching it on my cell phone.
I'm tired of voting for something that we're not getting.
I will look into it for sure.
Another thing with the auditorium, though, is it is late
with power issues.
It drops out all the time.
And we have UPSs over there.
We've been trying to figure that out.
But that would also contribute to the connection issues.
Well, we have you now, Jeremiah.
Yes, ma'am.
Mr. Mayor, can I be recognized?
And this is for the finance director.
These are capital projects, right?
Yeah.
Why do we have something in a capital project $60,000?
So our capital threshold, everything that we capitalize is
$5,000 and up.
And making sure it has more than a useful life in one year.
Yeah, but that's just a projection, right?
We don't know this could be lower.
So it could drop off a capital project.
Correct.
If it comes in at $3,000 or the director thinks it's only $
2,000, don't put it on capital.
Don't even have part of the conversation.
But $5,000 and up is the threshold.
Okay.
So that's the threshold.
I just wanted to make sure.
Yes, sir.
We're seeing stuff for $6,000.
We'll put something in the budget every day for $6,000.
It's not a capital project.
Okay.
That's just the threshold.
Okay.
This is -- you've got a networking scanner.
Is that GG or GG?
Is that CG?
It's GG for general government.
Okay.
So it will essentially be for any department that requires
their replacement for their scanner
is -- it's been kicking the bucket along.
It doesn't want to work very well.
And it just needs replaced.
Okay.
All right.
And that's all I had.
I'm just looking at this amount and wonder why they were in
capital.
But then he explained it as the pressure.
So thank you for that.
I don't have any other question.
Thank you.
One quick follow-up question.
So if we do explore the more desolate-pronic-based system,
would -- and you probably don't have
the more right now, would that be all forms or desolate-pr
onic-based system?
Are we talking for the document management?
I'm going to be talking about all the --
Okay.
Yeah.
So essentially we would still have to scan it for some way
to get it there.
One of the nice parts about that one, though, outside of
all the other cloud benefits of updates
to security and all that, that they take care of, is it
would be more automated
and it should be more readily available.
Right now we have to buy individual licensing for each user
.
But to my understanding, that's not quite the case anymore.
We're paying for the storage and then the users can use it
from there.
Just to piggyback on that and give a real scenario where we
could actually
eliminate paper altogether.
When a director has a request to purchase or they want to
buy something at $7,000,
what happens right now is they create a document.
It's called a request to purchase.
They sign that.
They attach three quotes to that paper copy.
They send it to City Hall.
I review it.
Lloyd reviews it.
It goes through all the chain of command.
It goes back to them.
They actually buy it, invoice it, and then they submit back
an MPF paper form with the invoice
and it goes through that same chain of command.
What an electronic based system is now those quotes can be
attached.
We can go through a workflow.
I see it.
Lloyd sees it.
It goes through that process.
All electronic.
They buy it.
And then the invoice gets posted right back to that too.
So all that paper would be eliminated.
And that's just AP.
You know, that's just one process that we're doing that all
paper based that would go away.
Right now, ADG does not have that functionality within the
platform.
So again, that's just one scenario of what we would be
trying to eliminate from a paper based man.
Thank you.
All right.
Thank you.
Mayor Smith, I just have one question.
Will this be the same thing for the police department?
In terms of the process?
Yeah.
Are they still paper?
Everyone.
We're all doing that right now.
Every department is doing that way.
So we've already heard from the police department.
Is it going to be on operation that they asked for some
software so that it's not paper based?
That might help.
Yeah.
So police would be covered in this request of this $1
million.
If we move forward with this, it would capture police, fire
.
Every department in the city would now be under this new
umbrella for that software.
You wouldn't see it twice for being separate.
Okay.
Anything else?
All right.
Good.
So just going down the list again, this is all part of the
replacement program.
PC's Jeremiah, part of his proposal is he attaches like a
schedule.
How many of these laptops or desktops are 2017 and need to
be replaced.
He's got an ongoing cycle that supports each one of these
requests.
So he sees 250,000 servers, 150,000.
My understanding is servers, about two server replacements.
Each server is 75,000.
Jeremiah came to me screaming the other day saying these
servers used to cost us 35 to 40,000 and now are 75,000
costs.
So what we used to be able to get three or four within a $
150,000 budget, now we're only able to buy two on this
replacement schedule.
So we're seeing costs go up.
AI is a piece of that where all this technology and
software costs are just going up.
So just want to bring that AB replacements 100,000
telephone throughout the city 70,000 surveillance 48,000.
A.B. Lake Eva Center.
The event center, yes.
The event center.
Yep.
That's for the screens that have been falling apart at this
point that desperately has changed.
So does your computers for $75,000, is that just IT?
No.
This department is for the entire system.
So does your computer for $75,000, is that just IT?
No.
This item is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the whole department.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is for the entire city.
The whole department is within the city.
Okay.
So I don't, I don't, I don't, I'm here again for parks and
recreation, but I did talk
with Lloyd about there used to be a paper on the computer,
the library that said out of order, not working, whatever.
Have we replaced them?
Are they upgraded at this point?
Because those are very important to our resident.
So those computers that had the out of order papers on them
are actually not the city's computers.
Those belong to the library co-op.
I believe they have been fixed since then, but there's not
much we can do on them as they're not our property.
But it's, the library is our property.
The library is, yes, but those computers in there, the co-
op even has their own network in there, so they don't touch
anything on ours.
They're all on their own.
So we can't have our own computers.
We could.
I'm just saying it's going to be our residents that come to
our library to work on what they think is our computer.
And to tell them that this is somebody else's computer, I
don't think it's a good look on our own.
Yeah, but I think that because we received tiny money from
the library, that's the co-op portion of it because we do
get fined.
I understand that part, but I'm saying the resident doesn't
know that.
So you said it should be two sets of computers, one for the
co-op, one for just the city.
I'm saying that something needs to be identified or next
year we need to spend the co-op money on something else and
we have all that's our computers that are in there.
Because what we know, the five of us and Jeremiah and the
finance director, the average person that comes into the
library doesn't know that.
And so I get a message, what kind of library is this that
you got all of these things on it that says out of order
and not work.
Right.
So please, we'll look at that.
We'll make sure we look at the co-op agreement and make
sure again, if there's something that we can do internally
and take responsibility and not affect funding, we'll take
those actions.
If it's again, if it's going to be some sort of contractual
breach, we'll make sure you guys are aware as well.
And then you guys can make a decision on adding those units
to it.
Or if there's something else that this co-op, you can use
this for, there are the special computers in the back of
the room or the front of the room that says that this
computer is owned by a co-op versus the paper that says it
's not working because it looks bad or not.
I understand.
We'll have that conversation.
I know the co-op has been going in a direction where they
want the municipalities to take more control versus them
being the custodian everywhere.
So we'll go ahead and bring that conversation up to the co-
op.
I saw Terrell run out.
You want to go make that call right now.
I'm so sorry.
Yes.
Two follow-up questions to the commission conference.
With the co-op, we know that they're supplying the
computers.
Do they allocate funds for us and we purchase those
computers or is it we have these computers and we deliver
them to your location, et cetera?
They deliver those computers.
Okay.
They are entirely on the co-op.
They're not the same.
And then when they do go down, do you know what the
reporting process is to report?
When we are made aware of it, we reach out to the IT
contact over at the co-op and they tell us we'll send
somebody out right away.
But you know how that goes where sometimes it can take some
time for them to come out.
Right.
But we report it to them.
And then they would, as far as those technicians that you
're talking about, it would be basically everything paid off
for every life period.
And then we'll just get to schedule.
Okay.
All right.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Any other specific questions in that?
Again, replacement program, other general government.
We want to make sure we're not skipping anything, but we
want to make sure we're highlighting the ones that you guys
want to have a conversation on.
Real quickly here for the surveillance, the 48,000, is that
for a thing of equipment?
Yes.
Those would be replacement cameras for major computers.
And we have quite a few around the city right now.
And my final question, I sent a question to the fire
department on this list of our line items that you have in
front of us.
What would be something if we had, if this permission hadn
't, think I was done with what we think that we have?
Because we are under a certain amount that we have to
improve.
Honestly, at this point, I think servers would be the best
thing to remove due to their inflated cost.
Okay.
As finance director DeJesus mentioned, essentially AI is
running the cost upon all these components, and it's
astronomical at this point.
Okay.
Servers we could continue to keep using for the time being.
If we need to do extended warranties, that would be an
alternative to replacing the actual servers.
Yeah, and so then you said we can move this to about the
next year or so?
Yes, sir.
Okay.
Thank you.
Let me ask one follow-up question.
And so we remove these services.
I guess my biggest concern is if we are removing anything,
does it kind of nullify something else that we've been
approved?
You know, we wouldn't want to approve one thing.
Right.
It's a domino effect and cause the issue.
Right.
Not for this one at this time, because the reason for a
replacement is essentially to keep it up to date,
but there's kind of a buffer room in there if that makes
sense because we don't know when stuff is going to be
delivered or stuff like that.
So these should, the servers we have now would still be
good to continue doing their functions as they are.
They just wouldn't be able to indefinitely for years and
years and years.
But if we can keep everything in and still be within our
fiduciary responsibilities here, then we're good with that.
But if we have to, then we'll just let you know the reason
being.
That's the first thing you and you.
Yes, sir.
I just wanted to clarify.
There's an item in there, a replacement program, AV 2027,
100,000.
I just want to highlight that one.
So that one is for this commission chambers to make updates
to the projecting and the AV audio.
And the streaming functionalities.
Yeah.
So I just want to highlight that because again, direct
impact here inside the chamber.
$100,000 per hour.
A quick question on that.
Mr. Mayor might be recognized.
You may.
Okay.
Thank you.
Um, didn't we approve that in this current budget and it
never happened?
So now we're going to ask for the same thing again to be
approved with, um, the screaming, the projectors, the
microphones, um, everything was supposed to been updated
and that was approved in the last budget.
Okay.
Thank you.
I have to go back and check.
I know we did a component for the streaming, um, which we
were doing with the camera, but as far as the microphones
and the actual system that operates and we hear that, that
sound that comes back, this will take care of more of those
components as part of this project.
The streaming, I think was something separate for, uh, just
getting live and doing that, the commission request, but I
'll go back and confirm in this year's budget that line item
was already approved.
Okay, thank you.
I'm going to submit you $100,000.
Uh, go ahead, Commissioner.
Thank you.
This is the third microphone that I have had since 2017.
When is it going to get right?
And I know that this is for your time, Jeremiah, but I'm
just letting you know that this is the third one.
People cannot necessarily hear us out there in the audience
.
I've had the one where we can turn it off and not be the
hot mic thing, but how, how many microphones are we going
to buy?
Are we going, are we ordering from T-MOOL or what are we
doing?
I just want to know.
I think they just mute your mic.
That's what happened when you're on your mic.
And I agree with you, but I just want to know what is the
deal with it.
I've complained about the streaming.
And I think, Jeremiah, you saw that it is, it can be
improved.
Um, but these microphones, I mean, I just really hope that
this time we get it right and we order from the right
person.
And if we don't know who to order from, let's ask Winter
Haven, let's ask the city of Lakewood, you know, put our
pride aside and ask somebody where things are working.
Bartow does a really good job with it.
But we have not, Lord, this will be the fourth microphone
that we have had.
And I hope it's the last microphone before I leave in 2029.
Thank you, Leil.
In a statement.
So we did have a company that we brought in who did an
assessment of the current condition of everything.
And the system, I think it's called Restron, that runs the
system in here.
And it is very outdated in the system.
Whoever set it up originally, the way that it's set up is a
proprietary setup where other people can't come in and even
make adjustments to it.
But the wiring that they put in for the whole system
creates interference for the online streaming that makes
the audio even worse online than it is in here.
And here it's gotten a lot better, I think, sitting back
there and noticing, being able to hear people speaking up
on the dais.
But it's compounded, in fact, from the old equipment to the
wiring and everything.
So the company that came in and did the assessment has
actually done quite a bit of work for Lakeland.
And it has a really good reputation.
So it won't necessarily be that company that will do the
final because we have to put it out to bed.
But we will see a noticeable difference on that.
Well, the chief is not always the best.
No, I agree with you.
I think that's why this is the third microphone that is
here.
We keep going with the cheapest.
We need to go with the most reliable and where people can
hear.
Because I normally, and I see the vice mayor, sometimes we
pull the microphone closer for people to be able to hear
what people --
Hear us on my earlier.
Okay.
That's where you went.
Okay.
So people can actually hear us.
I don't always remember to do that.
But I, again, Lord, I hope this is the last one that we
have to get or the company upgrades it without charging us,
you know, too much money, you know, maybe $1,000 or
whatever.
And whose budget is that coming out of?
Is it coming out of IT?
Or is it going to come out of the commission's budget?
I learned my lesson the first time putting it in the
commission's budget.
That's what I think happened last time, that it was not
approved in the commission's budget.
Yeah.
So right now it's inside of other general government, which
is just the entire city trying to take it off.
Okay.
Okay.
So the only other thing to take out of our budget is what
James King charges us to put the water in if we go to the
rest of them, you know, every two minutes.
Okay.
That's it.
All right.
Commissioner John.
Speaking of what Commissioner Huffman just said in regards,
I know this is just discussion and suggestions, but
definitely looking to a sound engineer.
I'm not sure if that's your expertise, but if not, there's
nothing wrong with getting a third party here who actually,
this is what they do day to day.
Even if you're going to a guitar center or somebody there
that does that type of work, getting a sound engineer in
here definitely will be a bonus to you.
And also streaming it, it is hard to, it is difficult.
I know you're trying to do something about that as well,
but I would definitely tap into it.
Again, these are just suggestions of looking at a sound
engineer.
So again, we don't have a third and fourth mic.
Like she said, you get someone here who knows what they're
doing.
It comes down to sound and rooms and acoustics and things
like that.
So that matters.
I know you do the tech side, the information side as well,
but look into that as well.
All right.
Thank you for that.
So, and I know we got to move on, but you know, if for the
$100,000 when we just come out of this room, and I
understand there's a lot of areas that need to be improved.
Like, you know, for that $100,000, I guess my biggest
question was, is that just for the streaming portion of, so
you know, when we have residents on the stop bar, you know,
what actually, you know, because like they said in the past
, we have approved different, you know, items for this room.
But you know, it's still like it all remains the same.
So, you know, we're going to have an iPad to do the
streaming, you know, to the camera in the back room.
So, when I said streaming, essentially what I was referring
to was just making that process better.
The streaming process we already have back there would
likely stay, it would just be placement of those cross
wires, the microphones we have up there, the stronger
projector.
You could tell they're starting to get a little bit.
Just items essentially in this room, not necessarily the
streaming component itself.
I don't have it.
You know what I'm saying?
No, so we were able to confirm it was presented.
I just want to say, Jeremiah, I think you're doing a good
job.
Thank you.
And you had to step into a lot of heat, especially coming
from me because I just got tired of paying for the same
thing from your department.
So, I'm glad that you are here for the good of the job.
So, moving on, we'll jump to the transportation department.
You already here.
He's already up front, ready to go.
You feel it?
Yeah, while they come up, I just do want to mention we did
look at the 26 budget.
It wasn't in there.
It was in the 25 budget, but did not make the cut in 25.
So, it was presented as 100,000 back then and just did not
get approved at the time.
So, real quick, I know on the utility side that
Commissioner Huffman, the comments you made, finance
director wanted to go to a coin operated system for
commission.
So, you just have to, he'll give you a roll of quarters.
That way you're good to go on that.
So, we want to start on the Citrus Avenue MLK roundabout.
Is this what we want to start with?
Yeah.
So, that's something that we know is needed, has been
needed for many, many years and it's even more so now.
And with the future development over at the properties that
we have on MLK, it's going to be beneficial for traffic
control.
Right now, it's almost like a figure eight race.
You just close your eyes and hope for the best when you're
maneuvering around that area.
So, what's being requested now, the $450,000, that's for
engineering, design.
We're still looking at anywhere from one and a half million
to two million for the actual construction.
But what we're asking for this year is the engineering side
of it.
We will have something to bring back the next budget year
to physically get the infrastructure in the ground.
So, it's $450,000 just for the design phase?
Just for the design phase.
Great.
Let me ask you this question, Mr. Mayor.
Let me ask you this.
Have we, and I know we probably don't own this road, but I
'll, you know, we travel these roads every day when I say we
don't talk in the commission.
And you go to base and that needs a roundabout there.
That's terrible.
I don't know if you all never noticed that.
That four way stop is okay.
But if they have a roundabout also at base and 10th, I
think that'll keep that traffic going.
They can get backed up really bad.
I don't know if y'all have seen it, you know.
And I don't understand how those individuals that live on
the metro can even get out of their home because of that
fact that's backed up.
So, in the near future, I'm not saying right now, I think
we also need to look at a roundabout at base and 10th.
I would agree.
And even if we're part funding with the county to enter
into a partnership.
Because we have 10th all the way up to Bates, as you know.
That's right.
We did that over several years ago.
That's right.
Yes.
But get into an agreement with the county to co-fund that.
But I also agree with the Citrus Avenue and Railroad.
That is a straight bullet waiting to hit somebody quickly
there.
You know, you have to shoot across the 13th to get across
because somebody may be coming across that's right.
So, you're right.
I think that's very important that we put around a lot of
that.
And the design feature we're looking for also has the
pedestrian foot traffic aspect of it.
So, we want to, because we've got the new sidewalks now on
Lee Jackson or 12th Street.
Right.
We want to put the new sidewalks off the MLK.
It'll go fluid right over the tracks as well.
So, we're working on that with this engineer design.
Would that be an eminent domain problem there?
We own the properties all around it.
Right.
So, we have the fertilizer.
There's a property where that marquee sits there.
I don't know if we own that or not as part of some Mr. Timm
ons yard.
And you are correct.
I don't know if we would do eminent or we would just try to
work out an easement arrangement before we ever go the em
inent route, of course.
But it would be, you know, this is our plan.
We would speak with the owner, get some surveys, and then
come back and have conversations with you guys, of course.
So, the $450,000, James, for just a plan on it, this is
something that you have sent out the RFP or RF requests for
bid or something that's on it.
Because that's really expensive, I think, just to design it
.
I think you can buy some more trucks.
Well, this is just, this is the estimate that we're looking
at.
So, once we have the actual vendor and it's been approved
and it comes back to you for approval, it could be $450,000
, it could be $650,000.
Will it be $350,000?
I have no idea.
But that's just the estimate that we're working on right
now.
That's okay.
So, that's the best level?
Yes, ma'am.
Well, that's the best level based off of that size of a
project at the time.
I think it's a good project to have, it'll take some
experience in getting people, you know, to understand how
to do it.
Because a lot of people may not experience a roundabout.
So, it'll take us a little while to get them to understand,
but I think that it'll make it a whole lot safer for people
.
I don't drive, but I hate when my husband comes up 13th
Street, Railroad Avenue.
And I think that Mayor, I believe that what we do own that,
I don't know, Mayor, if it was you or Commissioner West,
that's what I think, Mayor,
that we do own that except for the Timmons project.
And I think that we shouldn't have a hard time talking to
him because we've been very relaxed with some of the things
that he's done to his property,
to his other property where that house is.
And he's a good guy.
Look, Commissioner, quickly, I don't know if you realize
this, for that fire station up by Advent Health,
that design phase was $750,000 just for that design phase.
So they can get very, very expensive, you know.
Design and engineering is a...
Oh, yeah.
Well, the EOC was a million dollars and we got a $750,000.
That's right.
Exactly.
We got $750,000.
Yeah, just for the design of that fire station up there.
So that's what I'm saying to you.
It can get very expensive.
Yeah.
I know it can get very expensive.
Lord knows, I know that it can't.
Woodley told me he got ChatGBT now though.
That's the case.
Yeah.
Exactly.
So he'll have it designed by the end of the day?
All right.
Exactly right.
That's it.
Exactly right.
I did want to mention, Woodley and I talked about this.
So this is the design phase.
I think the estimated construction was somewhere around $1.
6 million.
I just want to bring this to the commissioner's information
as you'll see this again on the CRA.
So they're also proposing this, not because it's a
duplicate, just because it's a potential project that they
're proposing for you to partner with.
Again, this is not a CRA conversation.
I just want to bring that to light that you'll see this and
you can decide combination one or the other.
You guys make that decision, but I wanted to bring that.
That is a two year project with a construction cost to
follow once the design is completed.
Do we have to get with the state or is it going to affect
Lee Jackson Highway?
It is not.
It is not.
It is not.
It just helps the flow coming off of Lee Jackson.
Okay.
Okay.
No further questions.
We'll go to the next item, the Paul truck.
Go ahead.
So the, the, the, the, the, the, the grapple is everyone
knows what those are.
You see them come through.
I think they're on Wednesdays.
Um, with our public services, it's the truck that literally
has the big claw that comes off
and picks up, um, debris, and whether it be, uh, limbs or
brush or whatever the damage
is.
Um, and after storms or during any issues, um, that's
something that we have an agreement
with Polk County and we wait on all of their vehicles to
come through from the vendor.
So on a weekly basis, you can ride somewhere in the city
and find something on the side
of the road that's not on anyone's property, um, that we
have to end up removing.
So the claw truck will make us more efficient in that
division.
And that's why this request is in there.
Do you have staff for them?
We have staff and it's not that they won't man that grapple
truck on a daily basis, but
we do have staff to operate it.
Well, basically during her season.
On a, in a weekly basis.
Um, so if you, like right now I'll get an email or a phone
call that says, Hey, there's
a pile dumped out on the side of the road, um, wherever it
's at within our jurisdiction.
Um, if it's not something that Republic is going to pick up
without a fee, we'll go pick
it up and we'll put it in our open costs.
We should have come to my house.
Now that will all stay the same.
That we won't be changing our process.
If someone has something out by the road, we won't go pick
it up.
That's, that's still going to be under the Republic
services contract.
So that was the intent is not for that.
So if someone has something out by the, by the road, they'd
have to get a quote from Republic.
That's part of the normal contract that stays the same.
This is for that, for those rope dumpings that we see all
around the city.
city. I just want to, I don't know if I'm the only one. I
can remember last year that
you came in for us for some type of vehicle that was sweet.
Did we ever purchase that?
I don't think we, it's not here yet. We're working with the
vendor on it and we're getting
one that does not require a CDO license. So that's another
benefit.
Okay. I was just, I was just wondering, I knew it was
something else we approved, some type of
truck, like not that, but something we approved last year
and I haven't seen it yet.
Yes, that has been in the works. So I think, uh, what's the
guy's name? Craig Whitmore?
Craig Whitmore is with the service that we're dealing with,
um, with that vehicle. And that
is still, we haven't ordered it yet though. Yeah. The
procurement process. Omar's strict
on us. So even though that he's got a good price, we have
to get to, we have to get three
quotes for it, of course, but that is coming. Okay. I'll
just, it just crossed my mind. Yes.
Talking about the program. Okay. Thanks. And when we do
that, we'll also cancel out what
we have with Republic services through that vendor that's
now sweeping the streets. Um, that puts
us on our own sweeping the streets. Why not? Omar is strict
. Definitely. He's not supposed
to take shots during the budget season. That was a good
shot. You want him to be strict.
Quick question. Um, as far as that goes, um, I guess you're
still in the process in the other
additional vote. Yes, sir. Does the money roll over? We
will carry it over every open project. Uh,
again, we want to roll over. We'll bring that back to the
commission and all that money will come over.
So how often will this truck here be used because, you know
, once you, you know, I mean,
it is some trash that are we going into the county and
picking up their trash that some people dump
beside the county roads? We are not picking up outside our
jurisdiction. We have enough trash within
our city limits to generate a truck to make this, to pick
up that, you know, you said we're going to
still maintain the Republic service, but this is for an
easy legal dump and then they just dump.
I don't, I don't, do we have enough to generate this? Is it
cheaper to pay Republic service?
They come in and say, Hey, can we, can we pay you all for
this to pick up or do we pay?
How much is this truck here? For, uh, 300,000. And this is,
and this is exactly what this
particular budget meeting is for, for these types of
questions and the data that come back and either
say, yes, we do, or you know what? We don't. So we'll have
that data provided.
Is it cheaper to just use Republic service? Because not
only do we have to buy this truck,
we have to make this and service this truck.
It just, you know, it's not justifying it. And I just think
that it could be in the long run,
cheaper to say, you know, maybe Republic service, go pick
it up.
You know, I just don't, you know, it just be, you know,
this is a lot of money and we got to cut something
somewhere.
We all know that we keep talking about this here because of
that. Is it worth spending $450 or whatever that price is?
What I'll add to that is, you know, what, why we can't
enter into agreement with it.
You know, them actually carrying it out.
It's just the other.
And, yes.
And, Mr. Mayor, might be right now.
Thank you.
My concern would be the price tag for one.
But more so when I saw it, I thought that it would probably
be in talks of taking this portion back from Republic
service.
Because, and I know you stated that we would not, you know,
we'll still utilize for public service.
And as you know, because I call you practically a lot, that
's one of the things that they're not doing within that
contract.
Like, every week we have residents reporting items that's
left in front of their home that's not being picked up.
So then I have to generate, and I'm sure the other
commissioners as well, generate a phone call to either you
or to Republic Service or to Republic Works and giving
addresses and say, hey, come pick this stuff up.
It's there three weeks, a month at a time.
So I would definitely be more so in favor if we were going
to eliminate something.
Over true.
Right.
Being that we had our own trucks.
Right.
But to spend $300,000 and then to still use Republic
Service for a lack of a service that we're already not
really receiving based on our contract.
Vice Mayor, you've got to understand, we've still got to
pay the dump fees on this.
Exactly.
You know, we don't take it to the city park or city
building and dump it down there.
We've got to still pay a dump fee.
So we have to, I agree, we'll have to eliminate Republic
Services on it again.
We're going to use our own.
And we're going to pay Republic Service for that.
Use our own.
We'll get the data together that shows what we pick up
outside of our contract with Republic for the next week.
Right, okay.
Yeah.
That way it's either going to be justified for us or not,
and then you'll be able to make the last decision.
They do a terrible job when it comes picking up bulk stuff.
I'll just tell you right now.
And I'm quite sure my situation is probably going to have.
I get complaints all the time.
I don't want bulk stuff from Republic Service.
But I'm not going to pay them that.
We're going to have a trouble.
No.
Mayor Smith.
Yeah.
If I may.
If you come on Valencia Avenue in Tangerine, where you have
the yellow, I guess.
The storm drains where they're painted.
The storm drains.
You're always going to see a whole bunch of stuff that's
there.
And I'm not sure why I agree with you, Vice Mayor and
Commissioner Wimbley, all of you,
that by taking that away, that is going to lower Republic
Services because they've already held us at Concord.
But the last thing.
So I don't know that taking that away is going to make a
financial difference.
Well, not so much just completely taking it away, but also
in a sense of because he stated that it would not replace
what they already picked up.
And that's the problem that we're having, that they're not
picking up.
So if we're not going to use the truck in conjunction to
what they pick up, it's kind of like we have our own truck,
but then we're also paying them and the items are still not
being picked up.
Yeah.
Does that make sense?
It does make sense.
Okay.
It makes perfect sense.
I just don't see Republic.
And to your comment as far as the drain system, what I've
been advised of by some of the residents,
that they are putting the items out by the curb, right, in
front of their home.
But they sit for so long, two weeks, three weeks, and they
're fed up with them sitting in front of the home.
So what they have started doing is now saying, well, I'm
going to put it on city property, and maybe they will pick
it up faster.
So that's why now we're seeing a load of all of these items
next to our drainage system because they're like, oh, well,
I'm not going to keep looking at it in front of my home.
Like one on Valencia, matter of fact, it just was picked up
three weeks later,
and they came out on yesterday and picked it up, which was
a non-route day for that area.
But the resident had been complaining, and then they
finally said, well, it's getting out in front of my home,
and I'm going to put it on city property, and then maybe
they will finally come pick it up.
And that was almost a month that it sat there.
So that's just some of the problems that you're seeing
while you're seeing those right next to the drainage and
everything
because they, hey, put it on city property, maybe they'll
pick it up faster.
We'll come back with stats on it.
Unless you just want to strike it now, then that's fine as
well, of course.
No, we can come back.
We'll come back with stats on what we do outside of the
contract or Republic's responsibilities.
Right.
The citywide lighting.
Can you also give us the amount that we carry the favor of
the board in our contract?
Just this.
Break out the bulk component?
Right.
Yeah, we need to know how much we're paying now.
Okay.
Then we can compare it with the three of the people we do.
Yeah.
And keep in mind, if we wanted to take over all of the bulk
, it would be about $1.2 million
because I'd want four trucks because as you fill up a truck
, it'll have to run to the dump,
and you'll always have them basically in and out.
So it wouldn't be the same request if we were to take over
the full public services side of it.
It would escalate, of course.
One truck would not handle the city.
The citywide lighting improvement program for $275,000.
The last commission meeting, we had a light program for $17
,000 that was approved.
We've got the lights on $27,000.
What's the percentage on those lights that are now
operational?
Is that the 80 percentile?
85 percent we have been working on for quite a few months.
So we don't want to take on more than we can choose from a
bunch of cycles,
so that $275,000 needs to come out of this year.
Unless you have another reason for it to stay, we want to
make sure that what's been approved, we work on.
But that $275,000 that's in the book, we're handling that
through other avenues at this time.
Unless that's a funding mechanism, it is, then we need to
leave it in.
We are recommending to go ahead and pull it from the
capital listing.
One thing that we did, and you'll see it when we do the
operational budget,
is we're receiving $160,000 maintenance from DOT.
So we've created a line item for Woodley to go ahead and
monitor that.
So as repairs and maintenance are needed, he can pull from
that and keep the lighting up to speed in real time
versus waiting for a capital request.
Because, again, it's contractually required for that
maintenance agreement.
Are we pulling this, you're saying?
We're going to pull this, and you'll see it in operation.
He'll have a budget line item for maintenance.
So you'll see it again.
It just won't be in capital.
Correct.
Mayor Smith, I have a question, which you already know.
I'd like to know if we can contract with the state to be
able to have our lighting up in part of our city limits.
Why can't we do the same thing with the county on Johnson
Avenue and Bates Road to be able to put lighting there?
So if we wanted to put lighting down that road, I know, in
conversation with the county,
since we have annexed both sides of that road through the
areas where the developments are,
they would probably not, and this is all conversation knee-
jerk,
they would probably have no issues with us putting up
streetlights and managing those streetlights within that
right-of-way,
all on our expense, since we have annexed both sides.
So that would just be a conversation that we'll definitely
approach the county with.
But the state is paying us, so I'm talking about the county
paying them.
That would be a conversation with the county if we, so you
're saying put them up,
and then they pay for them for us to manage them like we do
the others?
Understand the conversation.
I'll have that with the county.
Do you know everybody down here, Dave?
I'm sure it'll happen.
Yes, ma'am.
Well, the conversation will happen.
I have confidence.
Yes, ma'am.
Yes, ma'am.
Yes, ma'am.
That's that.
So the meridian barrier system, you remember after the New
Orleans situation,
this goes back to one of the last big events we had other
than Christmas.
We went to a place in Tallahassee and brought in some mer
idian barriers.
That's the same barriers as the ones you saw there.
They will stop a vehicle.
They will stop a box truck.
So they're a very good barrier system.
This particular $130,000 comes with eight barriers, the
trailer and the equipment to deploy.
That's just to get us started, basically, to build upon.
So every barrier after that is around $6,500.
So if it was something that we wanted to find the money to
share, you said,
James, let's order a hundred of those things and let's just
find the money.
They're around $6,500 apiece per barrier beyond this $130.
The $130, you get the trailer and the equipment for
deployment and eight barriers.
How often will we use the barrier?
Depends on the event.
I know we didn't use them at Christmas.
We used them for MLK.
I remember because we, well, you guys had to go and bar
them Tallahassee.
Yes.
Tallahassee runs and pick them up and bring them back.
So MLK and what else do you see that we would have a need
for, like, for a big major event to block the traffic?
Now, on the Christmas parade, that was the fencing that was
put up this past year for the pedestrians, so to speak.
But as far as the side roads, I think they were just
blocked with barricades and or vehicles.
So if we would have had them, we would have had them on
those side streets.
But the fencing would stay the same for the pedestrians.
And I believe we're looking into some more of that, aren't
we, for the pedestrians that fence you put up?
Yeah.
So that's great for the parades.
So the MLK was a little different because that was – it
wasn't a city event, but it was still a city-approved
street party.
And so you were going to have lots of people in the streets
for multiple hours, literally in the streets.
The other ones, it's the parade routes, of course, are veh
icular traffic and just, you know, keeping the pedestrians
safe with that fencing that Frederick Griffin had put out.
But the side streets could be used on the meridians as well
.
Right.
So my question is because due to the event in, I think it
was Louisiana that year, and we brought in these for that
particular year, not this past year, but the year before.
So other than MLK, where do you see the city actually
meeting the barriers?
Would we use them like Christmas bread on the streets for
Thursdays?
We would do.
We would do.
Right.
Right.
Right.
Yeah, I'm sure.
Sure.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
Okay.
No, no, no.
That's my question.
Like, are we going to plan to use it for more events?
All of them.
Do you have a number of credits to meet it?
Okay.
And I noticed that other cities like Orlando, they started
using those meridian barriers a few years ago.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So just for that one event that you just mentioned, that's
close to $500,000.
That's strictly barricades.
That's not additional trailers.
Right.
Right.
Right.
So $800,000, $487,000 just for the 75 barricades.
So it'll be.
How many of those, Jay?
You don't pick them up and move them by hand.
There's a custom dolly that comes with them and moves them
around.
But if you look them up on the videos, the videos are quite
impressive on how they stop vehicles.
And it even shows a box truck on there that's a full-size
box truck.
It's not animated or AI.
It's true demonstrations.
So they're a great system.
And just to add, actually what they use now, pretty much
all of these important things.
Oh, yes.
So if you're saying you want to give us more money this
year instead of the $130,000, that would be wonderful.
We'll start out with the $8,000.
Okay.
The next one is the CIC LED sign.
That will be a TMD conversation.
The light towers.
Right now for that $40,000, we're looking to try to get the
price so we can get two light towers.
With that $40,000, we'll find the best deal we can find to
get two of the light towers.
That's for the night work, the events and different things
that we would have in-house.
We do night work on streets, night work on storm projects.
So that gives us safety out there for the team members when
they're working out in the field.
Mr. Mayor, can we do this here if you don't mind?
You know, I'm looking at like the city and the light towers
and all.
So they're not a big major amount, but they are expensive.
What I'm saying to you, if we don't have any other concern
about the other ones,
instead of doing each line item by line item, if we have a
concern, we'll just jump to that one.
If we don't, then we can just, you know, you're going over
each line item by line item.
I think the main one that I'm concerned about is the one
where I see $450,000, $300,000, $275,000.
Well, I see some for $5,000 or $6,000 or $20,000 or $30,000
.
It really doesn't concern me as much as the bigger chicken
ones, you understand?
So, you know, unless we have something, you know, I don't,
I mean, a stump grinder, I mean, that's an necessity.
I'm quite sure.
So, I mean, I wouldn't have them go through the whole spill
on a stump grinder.
You know, just a lot of times.
And I think that's what we have been doing.
So, yeah.
I don't want to have to go through every one of them.
You know, there's something I'm concerned about.
It will say, hey, I got a question on this particular one.
All right.
So, from this guy, is there any questions about the
remaining items?
Mr. Mayor, I just have one quick question.
Go ahead.
For the message board.
Is that down at Public Works or where would that message be
?
That's a portable message board.
That's a portable one?
Okay.
Okay.
All right.
Any more questions?
I have one.
You know I do.
So, we have, I think, two now that the police use this to
check whatever the speed is or to say that the road is
closed.
Are you sharing the cost with the police?
Are you going to buy them?
And, you know, James, you charge for everything.
I have to.
I have to make the money back.
Chief, you want to split this with me?
Where's he at?
He ain't got no money.
So, the police doesn't get to use them because I've seen
them at Bates Road.
Well, we have borrowed theirs since we're all under the one
big umbrella.
I think we have used yours in the past.
So, if they needed it, of course, we wouldn't charge them
rent because they haven't charged us rent for it either.
I don't use the restroom, but you charge me a water bill.
I understand.
Okay.
No other questions?
Okay.
All right.
Thank you.
Anything else?
No questions.
Okay.
Director, Jason.
Burkman, that's the time.
Buffman is going to be leaving us here shortly.
Can we, is it possible, I don't know if Director, but he is
very advanced.
Can we go ahead and jump to Parks and Rec.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I think you did a great job, Parks and Rec.
I'm looking at the first one, man.
$270,000.
Well, it kind of burned out.
Last year we had about $8 billion in Calvary Ports.
It is what happened.
And we're still working to complete those, so we went
fairly light this year.
But I'll stand for any questions, if you're going to follow
the same model, just any questions that you guys have.
We're headed to the line items.
We're starting with Parks first, and then go to Rec.
integration. So I think that's according to the list of all
the whole other facility
is there anything under facilities maintenance
that you are expecting CRA dollars to be spent.
So I'll echo. You looked at the right person. I'll echo
what I said in the past.
Mr. DeJesus decides on the funding source so I'll defer to
him.
So right now everything is again general fund. We're going
to propose nothing from CRA.
Unless it doesn't make a cut and you guys want to
reconsider or the CRA board wants to
reconsider then obviously those things are up for grabs at
that point.
My question is I don't know where this would go maybe on
the recreation and I spoke to
director Griffin about an upgrade to the community center
there on lead with.
Thank you. The question I had was flooring to make sure
that it is like the
Oakland auditorium and not putting that vinyl back down
there to do something to make it look better so that it
will be rented more and the acoustics that are there and
the length is going to have in the way that it is going to
be a lot of work.
The fitness equipment. Are you talking about the signs
where they can stop and stretch or whatever?
We're jumping around to different divisions.
Are we on the facilities?
Okay. I was just trying to get to the facilities.
Okay. Yeah.
Okay. Okay.
I can speak on them.
Okay. No problem. No problem.
Okay. So this heating and HVAC replacement, how often is
that replaced and the one on the Oakland neighborhood side,
does it cover, I call it the old band room. I don't know
what you call it now.
The innovation lab.
The innovation lab.
Yes, ma'am. So with this particular request, what we've
done in the past is staff has not necessarily had HVAC
units on a replacement schedule.
Typically, you're talking 10 to 12 years. We got some of
these units here are 15 to 20 years old.
So city manager's office has requested that we get on a
scheduled maintenance plan with them or replacement
schedule.
So kind of what we started on, there are certain gases that
are going to be available.
I think it's the R22.
So we started with those units.
So now if that unit goes down, that gas is no longer
available.
We're having to replace it anyways.
Our model has always been to try to make those repairs
whenever we can.
However, since COVID, we're seeing even with some of the
newer units that are simply not lasting.
So the likelihood of us being able to maintain that unit
for 15 to 20 years like we've done in the past will simply
not happen.
So the first three or four this first year is based off of
not being able to get that gas.
And again, some of these units here are approaching 20
years old.
And of course, there's been maintenance done on.
There's been parts replaced.
But oftentimes, if we're looking to replace, say, a
compressor on these units, you could potentially replace
the entire unit depending on the tonnage, say for 15 to 20
thousand dollars.
And that compressor alone may be 10 to 12.
So we're waiting options to see what we're looking to get
on a scheduled replacement plan every year to where we can
upgrade all the units throughout the city.
Well, the Oakland neighborhood center, you are saying two
four ton units and one two ton.
So that's six two ton units there.
And it's $25,000.
But the Oakland center, I think where the men hang out at,
theirs is more.
It is smaller.
So your tonnage is what determines the size of those units.
So if you look at the Oakland neighborhood center, we're
looking to replace two four ton units and one two ton unit.
So that's why that amount is lower.
And then at the Oakland senior center, that's the original
since that building has been in place and that's a seven
and a half ton.
So therefore, that's why that one is higher than the four
units or excuse me, the three units for the Oakland
neighborhood center.
And I think I had my last question or comment on Mayor
Smith.
I spoke with Lloyd on this as well.
I don't know if I spoke with you, Terrell, about the Haines
City Community Theater facility upgrade at $55,000.
So they get a $10,000 or $20,000 grant from the city.
And now we're going to spend $55,000 on it.
I think it is good to have, to want to have it.
But is it a need to spend that kind of money because we've
been given $20,000 each year for at least two or three
years.
So now we're talking more of that Senate.
And if they decide to leave, I don't see us putting someone
else in there because that's a CRA building.
So Terrell, I just don't see $75,000 total.
And that's dividing the two with the $20,000 grant that's
there.
I think they need to do some fundraising to try to get
something because they're collecting money.
But they're like you and the event center.
We're covering the expenses of that and personnel.
But no money is coming back to the CRA fund.
So I'm good with the $20,000 maybe splitting this in half
to $25,000.
But they need to either give some money back to us or they
need to start having some fundraising.
So from my seat with that particular piece, and I don't
know if that document was included in your guys' packet,
but they provided me a wish list that probably had real $
400,000 worth of improvements to that building.
Obviously, we're going to kind of identify some of the low-
having fruit to place in here.
From a Clark's right standpoint, I think what they do from
the arts and all of that is extremely important.
On top of that, it's the city's buildings, what they left
there today.
It's still our building to maintain.
Part of that, many, many years ago, the same situation with
boys and girls.
That building was kind of abandoned.
No work was being put into it.
And now we're facing what we're facing today where that
building needs some major upgrades.
So I think if we're able to maintain some of the things
that need to be taken care of now,
then address some of the basic things.
I think some of it included ACs in their dressing rooms.
And some of it, like I said, slow-hanging fruit.
There were some other pieces in there.
Removing, I think there's a metal pole in the center of the
building there that would potentially cause some structure
issues.
So that's going to require some engineering and different
things.
I did not include that.
But I did include the entire wish list just so if the
commission wanted to entertain more money or less money,
whatever the case may be.
I did include that in there.
But I think it is very important for us to do our best to
try to maintain that building.
So if or when that day does come and the CRA moves out and
the theater moves out, then that's another hub on this side
of town for us to expand our summer camp programs, our team
programs.
So the building would definitely still be utilized if both
current tenants do they key the facility.
Well, I'm not, like I said.
There's only three in this, the three largest city that has
that.
And that's Lakeland, Winter Haven, and us.
And we're giving them $20,000.
We used to give the Boys and Girls Club.
We went from $10,000 to the $20,000.
And now we're back to $10,000.
And I feel that the Boys and Girls Club needs more money
than the money that is on the wish list for the Haines City
Theater Group.
Because more people in the community are utilizing the Boys
and Girls Club than they are the Haines City Theater Group.
That's just my opinion.
I don't have anything else on the facilities.
Great.
Commissioner Johnson.
In regards to, I think Commissioner Huffman said that the
community theater receives $20,000.
Yeah, so $10,000, I think, for the city's grant program.
I believe they received $10,000 over the last two years.
I believe.
I think they've gotten $10,000 for the normal grant
operating process.
The non-profit grant program does allow for a one-time,
like, special project, additional $10,000.
And they did participate in that.
So they got $20,000 the year before, $10,000 this last year
.
And that doesn't go far.
I just want to say that being in a musical theater myself.
So that doesn't go far.
I think, for me, you already said it, Director Griffin, is
that it's our building.
So we need to maintain it and preserve it.
That building has a lot of history.
Again, it used to be our library as well.
I remember going there as a kid as well.
But the community arts and community theater needs to be
something that we need to, we can draw more people.
The way this community is growing, we need to draw more
people to the theaters as well.
And then also get our children involved.
I think Winter Haven has a summer program that they have.
So that's why they generate monies as well.
So we can look into that as well to how they can generate
monies.
And then also assist them, being a tush-push for them,
finding a partner, a private partner, who wants to partner
with us and pour money back into them.
And then to see salt back with Boys and Girls Club, it
needs to be on another level.
When I go and see the Boys and Girls Club in Lakeland and
Winter Haven and what they're doing, it needs to be on
another level.
I'm just saying it because we have somebody on the board
sitting here to see those two go to another level.
But I do believe, and again, that's an opinion from my seat
, that those city buildings that we own should be up to par
and upgraded.
Especially when we have guests coming in to come to the
theater to see shows.
Because I've been there and I'm like, yeah, it needs a lot
of love.
And then last year the commission approved $40,000 so we
did replace the carpet within the theater.
And we were able to do that, I think, for about $22,000.
So there's some funding left over there.
And I know the theater also is making some investments back
into the theater with some seating and different things.
I know we paid for it recently for the installation of
those chairs.
So they are trying to do certain things on their behalf and
not just asking the city to cover every single thing that
they have.
And again, it's the squeaking wheel that gets the oil.
So sitting down with Curtis at the Boys and Girls Club,
sitting down,
whomever is the special one of contact at the community
center, and finding how we get to the yes.
We may not have to always use our monies for it, but we
need to definitely help them find it.
Because it's for the future.
I'm truly about the children.
That's right.
I want to quickly, Mr. Mayor, to get back off Commissioner
Johnson.
I want to thank you for the support of the boys and girls
club.
As I represent on the Boys and Girls Club Board of Dire
ctors, and Commissioner Huffman probably contested this, for
many years that we was giving the Boys and Girls Club money
, we thought that the money was earmarked in going back into
our own center.
And what we realized, that they was taking that money, and
we were giving them $20,000, and they were spreading that
out amongst all of the whole county boys and girls club.
And we had an issue with that, because we said that the
money we, the commission approved for them was for Haines
City Club.
Yeah.
And they wasn't now, they've changed that, and any money
that we, they get from the municipality to the city here,
it goes directly back into that particular club.
Because it, you know, they had outdated stuff in there, and
we knew for a fact that we was approving $20,000.
We went, where's the money going?
But now they've changed their projectory, and now the money
is being dumped back into that club.
So you should see a difference there, and I'm going to make
sure as long as I'm sitting there and staring at the pool.
Thank you.
Thank you.
And Mr. Weir, thank you.
And another thing, and I know we're not just harping on the
Boys and Girls Club, but the Boys and Girls Club is
currently having some renovation done to it now through CRA
.
And for the Haines City Theater, I totally agree that the
building definitely needs some upgrades.
And as our building, we have started now upgrading most of
all of our city facilities, such as Boys and Girls Club,
the old train depot.
So now I definitely see the need to go ahead and do the
theater.
But as far as community partners, there's a lot of
different community partners with using just the Boys and
Girls Club as an example.
I even partnered with Amazon being a partner with Boys and
Girls Club for years where we came in and we painted the
inside.
So everything you see inside of the Boys and Girls Club
that was all community partners through like Amazon with
paint.
One year we even painted the outside of the building.
So it's just for them, because it's not necessarily, you
know, for us, but it's for them to go out to research those
community partners,
Lowe's and other companies that's willing to do those
projects for them for just additional needs outside of what
the city can actually do for our own property.
So, but I'm definitely in agreeance with the, and I would
like to see that stay in when we go to striking things out
to get those repairs done for the theater.
I agree with the Boys and Girls Club at some point.
And I didn't mean to cut you off from here.
I apologize.
There are additional repairs that are still even there.
Right.
You may recall last year we had the care of funds from the
CRA and there was $200,000 allocated.
So once we get through this funding mechanism with that, we
'll re-identify what other upgrades or items that can be
addressed in that building to continue to put the Boys and
Girls Club at a level that's acceptable to the community
and the board as well.
All right.
And thank you for that.
In this board, I just want to make sure that we, and I
understand that the Boys and Girls Club, it may come up at
the future time.
And right now we just want to ask people both of the two
that are on.
So I just had one additional question, Mr. Mayor, for, and
Terrell for the vehicle replacement program.
Yes, ma'am.
So that is for two vehicles.
Let's see.
So actually there's a typo.
I don't know if the system carried over a request for a
future years, but that very first vehicle there, that one
should only be in the amount of $40,000 instead of $70,000.
And that particular replacement vehicle will replace one of
our Ford Explorers that we currently have in the fleet.
It's a 2008 Ford Escape that has 42,000 miles.
Now the mileage on it is extremely low.
However, it's in 2008.
So just the aesthetics of it, the looks of it, it's in poor
condition.
So we're just looking to, again, get our fleet on a
schedule or actually replacing them and pretending to over
use versus just keeping them until the wheels fall on
basically.
And then I also noticed that you have one with only 29,000
miles on it that you're asking for replacement.
Yes, ma'am.
And that one is a 2015 F-150, again, with the 29,000 miles
on it, again, to try to get in the habit of replacing those
vehicles, getting on that 10 to 12 year schedule of
replacing them.
Because again, this is one of those vehicles, granted, may
have low miles on it, but we've got to start seeing some of
those needed repairs.
So we're not getting any money off of them from the auction
.
So again, just trying to get on that schedule.
And obviously that's one that, if needy, it can be taken
out and we can maintain it for another two or three years
and maybe move that request out from a few years to where
we get 13 to 14 years.
And then with my final thought on that is because with all
the new budget cuts that we're facing, have you ever
thought about going into like a pool where, because since I
've been sitting here, honestly, I've seen more vehicles
requests than anything.
Like every year, there's a large amount of vehicles being
purchased.
And I can't tell you if we have them.
If we don't, who has them or what.
But have you ever thought about doing like a pool?
And I think that would cut down on the vehicle requests and
what that pool would consist of.
Because not every single person or department needs a car.
You do a pool and then whenever they do need a car, they
check the car out.
They log in what the mileage is.
They log in with the gas that they use.
They check it out and they check it back in.
I think that would save us a lot of money because we have a
lot of vehicles.
And I know you're only asking, I guess, for these two now.
But I'm just saying, have we ever considered it not just
for Parks and Rec, just for the entire city that doesn't,
for a person who doesn't require a vehicle every single day
, there's no need to do like a pool.
So we have something similar to that now within Parks and
Rec.
We have vehicle number 42 that's used pretty much on a
daily basis by my EA coming to City Hall according to the
bank.
However, that same vehicle is utilized by the library as
well on the days that they're going over offering the
internet classes.
So we do kind of have that system in place.
The majority of our vehicles are vehicles that are being
used on a daily basis for the most part.
The one Ford Escape, that's one of the vehicles that's used
by our custodial team.
So we do have custodial staff that maintains several
facilities.
So traveling up to the EOC or going out to Bend up the
ground park to maintain those bathrooms.
But for the most part, all the vehicles that do parks
recreationally use on a daily basis by each of those
individuals.
So we do have the one vehicle, 42.
And typically what we try to do is, even for the custodial
staff, is to get a vehicle off the surplus list.
Because again, the custodial staff is driving that vehicle,
say from the community center to Bend up the ground park on
a daily basis.
So they're not traveling very far, which is why the mileage
is extremely low.
But we've received resident complaints in the past about
the condition of vehicles and different things.
So again, with that 2008, just trying to replace it from an
aesthetic standpoint.
But to the point, that's an excellent idea.
And maybe that's a model that we can use more often because
I know there's a vehicle requested for the events center.
Very similar situation to where.
You're three minutes up.
Sorry.
No, it's not.
I'm sorry.
But that is definitely something we'll look further into to
see if we can incorporate that into more areas within the
department.
Okay. Thank you.
And quickly, Mr. Mayor, I want to be recognized.
Now, I'm hoping the vehicle with the 29,000 miles on it,
because it is an embarrassment of two of your vehicles you
have.
They got rushed at the top of the head of the floor and I
see them and I'm like, you know, why are we, if it's only
having 29,000 miles on it, even though, because you can't
compare your vehicles to a police department vehicle,
because you probably only driving maybe 20, 25 miles a day
compared to a police car that's driven about, you know, 80
to 90 miles a day.
But, so your life expectancy on your vehicles can go a lot
longer than a police car that's driven a lot longer, a lot
more.
But, why couldn't we take, even though it's a 2008 and it
has 29,000 miles on it, would you think it would probably
be cheaper if we could just get those vehicles, ain't it?
So it's the 15, the 2015, the '29, and the 2008 has the 42,
000 miles.
Okay, so one of them has 29,000, you said, right?
Yes, sir. And that's the one I think we'll just scratch
that one. But again, to your point, we can repaint them.
I'm perfectly okay with that. If the board is okay with
that. So, again, I don't want staff to end up coming to a
commissioner going to the city manager.
Hey, Terrell is refusing to replace vehicles.
No, we understand it. No, we understand. I'm just saying,
you know, I just don't think that 20, even though it's an
older car, but it's only 29,000 miles on it, you know?
If you want to get rid of it, bring it to my house. I'll
buy it from you.
That's no mileage, you know?
Because right now, with the parks, all of our vehicles are
being used, so we don't have that really a spare vehicle.
So that's one of those vehicles where it will be put on a
surplus list and it will remain in the fleet.
So when we do have to drop a vehicle off or an oil change
or a vehicle is down or something, we have that extra
vehicle there when it's needed to.
But that's not one that we would be sending to auction
because that truck is still in pretty good shape.
So we would definitely maintain that within the fleet as
they back up.
Okay. All right. Thank you.
Do we have someone to handle fleet management? Is there
someone you have specifically to handle fleet management
for you?
So, yes and no. We've kind of went to this past year where
we did an RFP, RFQ to solicit to get the better price.
In the past, it's been, I think, each department is off the
state contract or whatever.
Maybe go out and get your own quotes.
But I know by that seems all the benefits and if we need 10
vehicles, putting all that on at one time versus each
department going out and getting their own individual
quotes.
Okay.
So we've started that process.
And I don't want to speak or say something out of terms of
misspoken.
These are the right things.
Well, just to make sure we're talking about the same thing.
He's mentioning fleet management.
His mind went to procurement and purchasing.
My mind went to the actual software system that says your
vehicle needs an oil change and who's keeping that.
I think as an organization, we're now trying to funnel that
through the fleet maintenance department.
And John Weaver, I believe in this year's request, there is
a request for a $40,000 software for fleet management is
one of the requests this year.
So, again, hasn't been efficient, hasn't been operating at
a high level, but is a direction from administration to
improve that.
Because it is a high cost dollar impact to the city on
making sure their oil changes, make sure we're keeping them
in good condition and being able to address them.
And again, I know 42, is that the 2008?
Is that number?
I remember it was 42.
That's not the 2008, but that one has been around for a
while.
Yeah, that's been around a long time.
I know we're not just based on aesthetics on cars, but we
need to look our best and put our best foot forward.
Excellence is what we want to do.
We can slap lipstick on a pig there, the commissioner of
the West, and paint them, but you still want them to be
effective and use.
And again, they're only using them, but they're used quite
often.
That's my thing.
I think, although they may be used quite often, but as long
as there's no mechanical issues with it, and it's only
aesthetics, then, of course, it's just like if it was your
own car.
You'll take it to a paint shop, you'll have body work done,
you'll get a nice paint job, versus going out spending $50,
000 or $60,000.
If there's no mechanical issues.
Now, if we're having mechanical issues, and every week or
every other week it has to go to the fleet for something,
then definitely you would look at it as far as replacement,
because now it's just becoming hazard or whatever, right?
So, but if it's just for aesthetics, then I agree with
Commissioner West, let's see about doing, you know,
sometimes less is more.
We can spend less, but it's going to give us more that we
can do something else with, versus just keep replacing cars
every year, or, you know, that's just my opinion.
But I know you said strike the one, the F-250, I believe it
was, but we'll move on.
Yes.
All right.
I'm in the green side.
I think, you know, this needs a little pain, you know, so
we don't have any issues, or, you know, we're not having a
team.
But, you know, that, I think it's the most possible thing.
Is there anything, any more questions about the facility?
All right.
We're going to move on.
One item to point out, the second vehicle on the list there
, vehicle Chevy 2500 4x4 replacement program.
Again, I think this was a future year's request that
somehow got built on the 27, so we can scratch that second
$65,000 request there.
Which one, Terry Arnold?
So, under parks, the first one, the Ford F-250 service body
.
Yeah, second one, thank you.
And that's a request there for the Ford F-250 service body.
That replaces a 2006 F-250.
That has approximately 40,000 miles on it.
Again, I think this particular one, yeah, the miles are low
considered for a personal vehicle to drive 100 plus
thousand miles.
But again, this is one that's starting to have some
mechanical issues.
And what we try to look at is to see if those mechanical
issues are going to outweigh the actual value of that
vehicle.
And then that's when we look to start replacing those.
So that's kind of where we are.
With that, the F-250 service body there.
And I can answer any other questions about any other
requests that you may have.
All right, looking at the list of items that we have on the
park, are there any questions?
Yes, Mr. Mayor, I can recognize.
Thank you.
Quick question on the shade replacement for Lake Eva Park
large playground.
Yes.
So I remember the large playground was kind of like resur
faced a little bit.
Yes.
So did we not replace the shade at that time?
No, ma'am.
So last budget year, I think there was $320,000 budgeted to
replace the equipment as well as the PIB surfacing there.
The problem we're having with some of these shades, the
hardware on them, rusted out.
Some of them, I think just different storms now are very
saggy.
We had a situation probably a month ago where the train is
on the large playground.
A kid got on top of that, stood on the train and was up on
top of the shade cell itself.
So just for some of the hardware, we're not able to tighten
them up anymore to make the cells tight so they're sagging
and just kind of waving in the wind.
So we're working with the company.
So we're not going to be replacing all of them.
We're going to start by replacing any of the hardware that
we can.
That has been there since the park.
I was built in 2009.
So a lot of it's rusty.
It just no longer turns what we can tighten up.
Okay.
And then my other question would be for the holiday angel.
Yes, ma'am.
So it's a $15,000 request.
It's a very small request.
But how many angels are we looking to purchase within that?
Do you have an estimate?
I want to say, so what we did, I think last year the board
also approved $15,000.
So instead of coming with a $200,000 request, the thought
was to space those out to gradually replace those.
I want to say, because this past year with the $15,000 we
purchased new, I forget ornaments or something that we put
along the MLK, as well as I want to say 15 to 20 different
angels to replace the ones we had.
I can get you an exact number.
I feel like they were $500 or $600 a piece.
So we can replace a fairly significant number of those
angels to each year.
We obviously put them up.
We have bits and bobs that have been around for 15, 20
years or so.
But I can get you an exact number on what the replacement
costs would be.
Because oftentimes, typically October, November, a lot of
these companies come out with sales right there before
Christmas.
We can sometimes get them at a discount rate.
And I remember last year during the budget season, the
commission discussed as far as extending the angels down on
Henson all the way to, I think he said whatever street it
is by the 7-11.
But I think Commissioner Huffman said as far as 30th street
.
So are we looking to maybe if we're only going to add 15,
are we taking that into consideration or would these be for
Highway 27?
So public infrastructure, I believe, is always budget for
Highway 27.
Parks and Rec has always been in the downtown area, down in
Lake Ewa area.
We've always done New Orleans out on Henson as well.
But I think what would be prudent if we could maybe come up
with a map as far as where the board would like to see
angels placed.
Obviously, as we're expanding, we've always done downtown.
We've always done Lake Ewa.
We've always done Henson.
We've always done the Oakland area.
Maybe identifying some areas on the east side of different
areas around wherever.
So at some point, I think maybe work more importantly in
this team to develop a map for an entire city for the board
to say,
this is where we'd like to see angels and kind of base it
off of that.
Okay, thank you.
Mr. Mayor.
I'm looking at the list here and I know you probably
already got pictures and calls as well in regards to the
bathrooms.
So, I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
So, it's ironic you mentioned those bathrooms.
So, last week.
I think that's on the next section.
Oh, okay.
That's on the recreation.
Okay.
That's what I was looking at.
Okay.
Well, I think what she's referencing is, are you talking
Lake Ewa Park bathrooms?
So, we actually did some upgrades last week.
I got a call this morning from staff to ask me to come down
and look in the bathroom.
So, we repainted the interior of both men's and women's,
the exterior doors, replaced the sinks, replaced the
mirrors.
Got a call this morning.
Went in there where I guess at some point yesterday
somebody set off fireworks.
So, the new paint job that we literally just finished
Friday of last week, this morning, got in there.
Sinks are ruined.
The paint job is ruined where they left the fireworks in
the garbage can.
They just set them off in there in the men's bathroom.
So, that's kind of what we face.
We address things and fix things and within five days of
putting that money into those bathrooms, somebody's came in
and done that.
So, it's a constant struggle.
But we are fully aware.
And then with that, the commission had budgeted or
allocated $50,000 for those bathrooms.
That was just one piece of it.
We'd be ready to add HVAC units to those.
As well as starting tomorrow on the B&W Grand Park, the
commission had allocated $40,000 for some upgrades there.
So, we're starting with the flooring.
They were painted last week as well.
And then we will be adding HVAC units to the bathrooms.
Thank you.
Let me spare a quick quick.
Can I be recognizing something?
Go ahead.
Dealing with the parks in Nile and Lake Evil, you know, I
noticed that in the Great Lawn, and I don't know if this
can be done or not, but, you know, it gets quite often out
there in the summertime.
And then when we have events and they put up the lawn
chairs and all, those people are sitting directly in the
sun.
You know, I always vision that we could have put up some
type of shade, you know, because even if it's raining, they
got to the end scattered because it's raining.
But, you know, if there's something going on on stage where
it's covered, and these people are sitting out there, the
event can still go on if they had something covering, you
know, the guests are sitting in the Great Lawn.
I don't know if we ever thought about it or looked at it
because it's just hot sitting out there.
And I'm surprised that somebody passed out.
We had to go around passing out water to people sitting in
that sun.
Have we ever thought about maybe putting some type of cover
over that and they can sit out there and, you know, don't
have to sit directly in the sun?
Commissioner?
I'm sorry, Eric, if I may be.
Yes, sir.
You can definitely start with this.
And I definitely understand what you're saying there, but I
think we just got to put that Great Lawn is an area that
most people are going to come to.
You know, that's the thing.
I don't know.
I'll be waiting at 4 o'clock before I come out there, man.
It's hot.
You know, and you're right.
It's designed.
I get to sit in the sun, but I ain't used to sitting in the
sun.
You know, I just thought maybe there's some type of we can
probably, you know, I don't know.
I don't see many people sitting in the sun, but they do.
And that Great Lawn serves multiple purposes, multiple
events.
So that is definitely a possibility.
Whether it's kids throwing to friends, be playing soccer,
football, whatever it may be.
Typically, when we try to put up pop-up tents for some of
those events, obviously, you're talking a 10 by 10 or 20 by
20, so you're not covering much.
But to that point, 4th of July, typically we've always
started that event with entertainment, say, 3 o'clock or so
.
And the bands are just playing to the grass because it's
too hot.
Nobody's going to sit there.
Nobody's going to sit there.
I know that.
So we've got to push the start time.
And the band is just wasting money paying a band there, and
no one's sitting out there because it's too hot.
And I don't blame it.
I don't blame it.
I'm not going to sit out there.
I can get some quotes and bring it out for the next.
And just that you have push the start time back because of
it.
Yes, yes, sir.
Yeah, I have to because they can't start in there earlier
because of the sun.
But my next question is that we talked about in our parks
placing markers of someone that made a significant
difference in our city when they're walking around our
parks that they can read.
I don't see anything in your parks budget about maybe
markers, you know, identifying individuals.
We may have a building name out of someone, but like I said
in the council meeting, some of these younger kids don't
know who the heck is that person.
It's just something that you can read about.
You know, Lake Evil.
Can anybody tell?
I mean, I know why Lake Evil got his name, but I guarantee
you probably someone else sitting up here doesn't even know
how Lake Evil originated and got that name.
So we got a part called Lake.
We got some called Lake Evil.
But somebody asked me how do Lake Evil get the name?
I may be able to tell them, but I don't know if
Commissioner Johnson can tell them how Lake Evil got the
name.
And it's like, y'all got a partner in Lake Evil and they
don't know how his name.
We got to educate our community.
And I think that we should have something that just means
we should have something in our part to say, you know, Ben
Graham.
How did he get a name?
How did he get Janet John to a quality center?
Nobody even knows.
So we've got to start putting markers on.
Yeah.
So we've talked about this and we've started that process.
But again, I think getting that information together.
I know the board has also talked about finding a way to
recognize people.
So we do have a program that has been approved that we've
had in place for almost three years now.
And it's on the city's website.
We've advertised it in the past where basically you can
purchase a 12 by 12 plaque that will go along the trail.
You can either choose the trail in Lake People Park or Bend
up the ground park.
In those three years of the existence of the program, we've
had one individual fill out that application for that
program.
And usually it opens up every year from January, I think
January 1st to like the end of February.
So that's why you don't see anything in the budget for that
because I've budgeted for it in the past.
I've not gotten any applications.
So we do have a budget for that that we pay for it.
Just someone has to submit the name.
So yes, that was approved two or three years ago.
It's up on the website.
And like I say, typically it's January, but I'll give the
staff.
We'll just go ahead and do another push now on their social
media.
I think it needs to be, you know, I mean, it needs to be on
social media because I'm quite sure there are some folks
that would be glad to submit names and information, you
know.
I like to submit Mayor Smith and say, well, you know, how
do you became the mayor?
You understand?
Can it come back before y'all for the final approval?
And also just know that it's not part of the break.
So at some point those applications will come back before
the board for that.
Can we bump it back out there to social media and let
people know that you're going to finally do that?
And I think that's important.
That's all I have to say.
That's all I have to say.
I would like to know when are we going to really, when we
say downtown for some reason, these angels can make it on
Ingram, but there's very little Christmas on the bottom of
6th Street.
I don't know if it's a lighting problem.
If the building is too old for you to nail something to put
a wreath on it.
But the bottom of 6th Street, and when I say the bottom, I
'm saying from Main Street to Henson.
There's very little for Christmas, and that's where more of
the commercial stores are.
Yeah, we can add more.
I know in the past we may have had some issues with the
receptacles on the poles, but we'll definitely look to
increase the amount of angels or ornaments or whatever.
I don't think there were ornaments, definitely not angels.
And I think there was some poinsettias at the request of
some of the businesses that was there.
So when I think of downtown as far as commercial businesses
, I'm thinking Main Street to Henson Avenue.
I'm not excluding Ingram, but there's more commercial
businesses.
And I think that map will help that because obviously I
just tasked my team with going out, put them in areas that
they think they should be going.
And if they're going to establish that map, then there's no
question.
We know that where they're going to be, or the direction
for the board.
Okay, thank you.
Anything else?
The parks.
Okay.
Is there anything else?
Yeah.
Tell them, there was a question.
All right, good.
I think this phone was over.
We're going to talk about it.
I don't think it's not the recommendation.
Do you have any questions?
I have some questions.
I'd like to know with the Oakland Auditorium restroom rem
odel, is this something that just your staff that may be you
and your deputy director are looking at?
Are you getting input from some of your other female staff
from the Oakland neighborhood to go in there and look and
see?
How often are you remodeling the restroom?
So with the budget process, I allow each facility
superintendent to provide whatever it may be to provide me
their list.
We discussed that list and then I may add or take away from
that list.
So these particular requests came from our recreation
superintendent.
Who is that female?
My staff would tell you when it comes to aesthetics and big
line colors and all of that, that's not my forte.
So typically I'm going to stay as far away as I can from
that to allow them to add their expertise and trying to
follow the current trends.
So that is something that will be considered and it won't
just be on the Toronto and Gerald making that decision.
So I have two other questions for Parks and Recreation and
of course,
Meera Smith will be leaving.
And that is, if I remove for the old concession stand.
What is your long time goal maybe five years from now for
that old concession stand?
So you may recall this past year with that old concession
stand, we converted it to a storage unit.
So we break them in.
The issue we run into with the programs at the new con
cession building, simply not enough storage for the two
programs.
So what we did, we still have storage underneath the old
press box.
So Mr. Rags has that storage as well as the storage in the
old concession stand.
Between the two programs, I gave the option.
You can have the new storage room.
It's not as big if you get another two.
So between the two programs, they work it out to where Mr.
Rags got those two.
And the Vipers got the new storage at the new concession
building.
So you just use concession stands so we would know.
Yes, the old concession.
Yes, ma'am.
What you're talking about.
Yes.
Okay, versus that.
Yes, ma'am.
I'm going to look to replace the countertops that are
extremely outdated and in some cases damaged and look to
address the flooring.
And that work as well.
Hopefully the entire building somewhat matched throughout
the banquet hall areas, some of the bathrooms, as well as
the kitchen.
Okay, and my last question is one that I have heartburn
over it each year.
And that is what the library, $100,000 every year for books
, what books are they buying when we have friends of the
library.
But $100,000 in books is a lot of books.
And that request is made every year.
And I started asking this, I want to say in 2019, might
have been earlier.
Are there some books for African American children to be
able to see themselves as a fireman, as an astronaut or
whatever.
I also asked about books for Hispanic kids as well.
And I think I saw, maybe I'm going to say a dozen, and I'm
being nice on each one.
So, I know those dozen books didn't cost $100,000.
And so every year it's $100,000.
What books are she buying?
I don't have a subscription to Vogue, so I have to ask
Commissioner Johnson and Vice Mayor Downing,
do those subscriptions cost that month $100,000?
They do not.
It doesn't.
No.
They do not.
I can ask for it.
They do not.
I'm just asking them because, you know, I'm still looking
at the old Essence books that are out there.
So I just want to know because, Lord, I have harbored every
single year the $100,000 in books.
What books are we buying?
If it's subscriptions, you know I like the pro whatever
that is that I'm able to go in there and look at some
research on African Americans from back in the 1800.
But $100,000 worth of books is what books are she buying
every single year?
And understand with that request that's pretty much
anything that's in circulation.
So it's books, it's DVDs, it's the games for the Xbox, it's
all of that.
So each year we're purchasing new books, replacing some of
those older books.
But I'm more than happy to give Maryland to get a list of
the new books that we've purchased this year or all those
things that's in circulation to show what we're doing with
that.
Typically, Black History Month, we're putting out a display
with books.
We're probably the same thing with Juneteenth as well as
Expanding Heritage Month.
So additional books are being bought for those particular
occasions just to make sure, just based on feedback from
the community and the commission in the past.
But I'm more than happy to get a list together of the new
books that were purchased this year.
And understand we get approximately $250,000, $300,000 a
year from the library co-op.
That some of this funding goes towards that as well as
salaries and other things that the library is doing.
Thank you. I'd like to see what books she bought last year
and what books are she buying this year.
Yes, ma'am.
Because that's $100,000 is two trucks for you.
I'm going to have to read a lot of books.
And I'm going to have them myself.
Okay.
I'll spend a few weeks.
Yes, ma'am.
I have two things now that Commissioner Huffman has said
that.
But the first one was, it's already answered.
I found the page with the Oakland Neighborhood Center Aud
itorium.
It's in there.
It says flooring.
So I was going to ask about flooring and things like that
being changed.
But that's already answered.
The other one is, I know you mentioned that the book
displays are pretty much seasonal or would that, if they
can find a way to have a section for those different ethnic
groups that she spoke of that's year round.
I know some libraries do it.
I know some libraries do it.
I mean, every library is different.
So if they can kind of push the culture.
And again, I know this is discussion and suggestions.
So this is all this is from my seats, discussions and
suggestions.
But to have a section where that is not just, you know, in
October where we celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month, but
there's a section already that a group of children want to
go to that's already year round for us.
Love the displays.
I love to see that all the time.
But that's all I have.
The flooring was in there.
I answered my own question because you already had it in
here.
But that was it.
And I'm pretty sure those books are in our normal inventory
.
Yes.
I'm purposely taking them out and put them on display.
Yes.
Yes.
That's funny.
But I'll make sure that there's an increase in those
offerings.
Quickly, Mr. Mayor, can I recognize?
Yeah, ma'am.
On the, with the library and the books, they're like an e-
reading system.
You know how you can read it online or it reads to you.
And we're talking about going paperless, but then we're
also talking about $100,000 in hard paperback type books.
And, you know, it's going to a digital system.
So why are we still going out and getting hard books
instead of trying to go to a system where they can read it
online or inside the library or it can be read to them, the
ones that, you know, disabled and they can hear if they're
reading back.
So it's two-fold.
With a lot of these devices, most people are trying to get
kids away from the devices.
Although, hey, you're on your device to read unless you're,
and I face this with my own kids, you're supposed to be
reading.
I look up, you're playing some type of game or something.
Also, within whatever I send you guys about the books, I'll
include the circulation numbers to give you an idea of the
number of people that walk through those doors on a daily
basis.
I know there may be people reading online and those
different things, but there still ain't a lot of people
that prefer to come and actually pick up a book and sit
down in the library and read.
So, yeah.
I want to go back a minute back to the parks.
I know we love those things, but I didn't see anything
included here for cemetery.
Would that be under the city clerk or would that be under
the cemeteries on the parks?
Yes, so we're responsible for the maintenance.
The city clerk's office.
But I didn't see anything budget any of this about our cem
eteries and upgrade of the cemetery.
I didn't see anything.
So are there any particular upgrades?
There's a system that we use online to give you your loc
ator and stuff.
So that would be through the city clerk's office.
So I'm just cutting grass, making sure everything is
maintained properly.
Mr. Okay.
But I think you didn't put a lot of stuff in here that I
don't have a lot of concerns in.
And I'll ask this question to you.
There's something that you can cut, but we have to probably
cut something.
But you might want to keep in mind that if you want
something you can live without and wait for the next budget
cycle,
and then we can bring that back and keep in mind if there's
something we can take out.
We're going to have a good something.
Yes, sir.
We'll do it.
Mr. Mayor, might we recognize?
You, ma'am.
And, Tana, I have a couple of questions.
And I know, I believe, Commissioner Huffman kind of
mentioned it, but I want more clarification on it.
On the Mars and Wally Field, the old concession, it says
fiber new for 38.
And I do understand that now that's just for storage.
Yes, ma'am.
So do we need fiber in there just for storage?
That was the budget.
That's for the camera system.
Because we currently, we got cameras installed at the new
concession building, but they're not connected to it.
We don't have to try that.
That is correct.
That is to the new concession.
For the old one, this would also be infrastructure for
security cameras.
Eventually, if they want to put door locks on there, have
the infrastructure there for it.
Right now, they're using a wireless bridge.
There's this radio signal from the top of the OZ gem.
I think it's on the gem.
And that thing gets struck by lightning left and right.
It doesn't work half the time.
This would just be a more steady solution.
Okay, so it would be for the security systems, pretty much.
Combination of both.
Combination of both because currently, like I say, the
cameras are installed at the new concession, but they're
not connected simply because there's no fiber connected.
So it would serve two purposes.
It would also be beneficial for wireless access points off
that building or anything else that uses camera.
Okay.
And then my other question, and I don't know if this is on
parks and under recreation, but it's somewhere in parks.
I have it here on my notes for the portable generator at
the youth enrichment center.
Yes.
So I know a couple weeks ago there was like a wedding and
then there was a baby shower at one location, a wedding at
the other location.
And I received the calls from the families that rented
those facilities because there was a power outage.
And it kind of ruined their entire event because the power
did not come back on for like an excessive amount of hours.
So are we looking just to get a portable generator there
because I believe when I went down because there was two
rentals.
There was one at the auditorium and then there was the
other one at the enrichment center.
And both locations lost power.
Correct.
And so do we not have generators anywhere like a backup
generator?
Because that's what I thought.
I was like, hey, what time does the backup?
I'm asking staff, what time does the backup generator come
on?
And they're like, there is no generator.
So, so, so our facilities do not have backup generators
typically the library is fortunate to be connected here.
But that request I think is, was for a future year request.
And the thought process behind it was during hurricane
season.
Nowhere throughout the city or in Oakland area has power.
Now that generator is there.
Now people can come and cool off, charge phones,
potentially feed people.
And then they're like, I'm doing those type things that
also would serve an additional purpose.
To that point, if the power does go out, it's a Duke energy
mission.
Power is not coming back home for three or four hours and
now I've got this event going on.
What do I do?
Right?
So then it would come on.
But if we're going to do it based off of events, I would
suggest we start with the event center.
Simply because most likely somebody is not going to be
doing a wedding or something out of the auditorium.
They could, but most likely it's going to be that event
center.
You're paying a lot more to utilize the event center.
So maybe if that's the direction you want to go, maybe look
to add one in the future to the event center.
Therefore, if the power goes out, you've spent $4,000 or $5
,000 on your wedding and that occurs.
That would be my suggestion to start there.
But my request for that generator for that facility was
more so if we have that natural disaster to get the
community somewhere to come in again to cool off charge
phones and do those type things.
So I think the event center is a great thing.
So I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
I think the event center is a great thing.
The auditorium is something next in line to the event
center.
Believe it or not, it's booked all the time for weddings,
baby showers, whatever, graduation parties.
And I see more so than often, and you probably could
contest, where there's so much going on there, like loss of
power, and then we're having to refund the rental.
So it's like we're losing money because of.
So if we were going to do even a portable generator, maybe
we should look at maybe the auditorium versus the
enrichment center because it's used more than the
enrichment center.
So that was just how I feel about that.
So I think that would be a better location than just the
enrichment center itself.
Yes ma'am.
We did the lake before, right?
So.
Oh, and then to the restroom part, I know we talked about
that, and I'm glad to see that we could finally possibly be
getting it done.
I think we talked about it for the last two years, and we
also entertain it going under CRA, but if it's within your
budget that we could have that remodeled on in both the ONC
as well as the Lake Eva one.
And I think in this particular request, the ONC building
itself is not in here.
It was submitted by staff.
But again, just realizing that there may be some budget
cuts.
So just to get clarification, is that something that the
board would like to see me put back in my request?
So the request is there, so the Oakland Auditorium, the
bathroom is there.
But again, staff did submit to me to do some upgrades at
the Oakland Neighborhood Center itself.
But I removed it, again, just thinking from a financial
standpoint, knowing that there's only so much money to go
around, but if that's the desire, I can add that back in
there.
Well, just for me going, if I have to compare the two, the
Oakland Neighborhood Center is worse off than the actual
auditorium.
If you go in and review, that's best from what I see going
to both facilities, that the Oakland Neighborhood Center is
worse than the actual auditorium.
That's right.
That's very interesting.
Yes.
Thank you.
All right.
Thank you for that.
The only thing I would add to real, I know we kind of
stayed with, you know, between the portable generators and
the back of the generator.
I think it's a wonderful idea if we did have them.
I know this may be shooting for the stars right now, and
all of a sudden, if we ran out.
But not only for those reasons, so we don't have to do
those refills, but also, you know, in the event that we do
have a disaster, you know, we would have a place.
I know we're not designated shelters, but there's no spots
right now, but we would have to do that in the back of the
power.
Do I find a question, Mr. Mayor? I'm sorry.
I did notice the events that are on here.
So is that going to be under CRA, or is that going to go
under you?
Yes, I think that's under CRA.
Where are we?
Yeah, correct.
So that's going to fall strictly?
Yes.
Okay. No problem. Thank you.
Anything else from recreation?
And we did go with the providers.
No?
All right.
All right.
All right.
That's it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
And --
All right.
Yep.
All right.
So at this time, we're going to take a recess here to let
everybody kind of stretch their names and, you know, make
calls and grab a bite.
Grab a bite.
Have a bite.
Great.
What's the first call?
You're fine.
Um, excuse me.
Uh, 15 minutes.
Yeah, we're eating 15 minutes?
Yeah, that's good.
Okay.
All right.
We got to go get food.
We got to go get food.
We got to go get food.
Y'all think y'all can wrap it up by 2 o'clock?
I understand.
Well, I think with general fun, utilities is -- we can
probably do general fun and stormwater.
Utilities, we probably have to leave for another day if you
want to hit that 2 o'clock deadline.
What is that?
3 o'clock.
I thought it was --
No, it's not until the 3 o'clock.
Yeah.
All right.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Okay.
All right.
So let me update that.
The city manager has told me that he is requesting a 30-
minute -- but we're saying that it's 30 minutes.
30 minutes left.
Okay.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, I know we're doing CRA.
Is CRA tomorrow, right?
CRA tomorrow.
Is it noon?
Is it noon tomorrow?
Good afternoon tomorrow.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon, good afternoon, good afternoon, good
afternoon, good afternoon, and the
all right jumping I'm gonna skip aquatics until he comes
back the next one city clerk no we had
real quick I think we covered aquatics I don't think we had
any questions okay so we'll just go
ahead and keep on okay perfect thank you the next
department city clerks department so this is a new
request the clerk asked us to go ahead and put this in as
part of her employment contract considering
a take-home vehicle for the city clerks again $40,000
budget set for that we had discussions on
like a Ford Explorer at the time was 35 so that gives us
something some wiggle room in case prices go up but that
was the expectation is $40,000 for a take-home vehicle
so we're currently paying a per diem vehicle for the city
clerk at this time right now they in the employment
contract there's a stipend like I believe it's
300 350 a month so we can we get the exact number what that
is y'all can look it up
and let me just say so with this request if we did approve
it it wouldn't be the vehicle plus the site no it would be
contingent on her on the contract being modified to remove
the stipend and add the take-home vehicle okay and then for
the vehicle and I understand that I think we said most cost
effective was the Explorer correct
but I do have some vehicles that are regular car yes we'll
say sedan right if that would that fall within the same
range if that was more I guess from a dean's perspective we
could I know we purchased a Camry for the
clerk's department uh previously and that was somewhere in
the $28,000
um I know the clerk did mention to me personally that she
would prefer an SUV she currently drives an SUV um just
feels more comfortable in an SUV but to your point from a
fiscal
standpoint we could make that and make it a Camry or some
sort of uh sedan
I would be cheaper but Mr. Mayor I don't understand but I
and I just want to get some understanding because if the
city clerk department has a car already
why would we pay uh and buy another car when they they only
use that car doing business power right
so if the city clerk department has a car already why would
we pay uh and buy another car when they they only use that
car doing business power right
so if the city clerk department has a car already why would
we pay uh and buy another car when they they only use that
car doing business power right
they only use that car doing business power right city
clerk is probably one of the least traveled
person unless it's election time going to the the
supervisor of election office I don't know
outside of that I don't know any other place where city
clerk would really have to travel but
why would we buy a car why can't you know we just turn that
car over say hey take this car it's already in place
like you know we're buying cars because we just can't I
just think my and just me now I could be wrong
I think that the car that's assigned to them now why can't
she use that car
we already own it right so is that and I understand with
that department there are
you know many needs for a vehicle is that not an option for
them to use the current vehicle right
I think it is for sure well Mr. Mayor may I be recognized
thank you um I'm not in favor and I'm going to tell you
multiple reasons why I'm not in favor of a city clerk
having a take-home vehicle for one again we have to look at
the cost and I know 40,000 is a basic part right but again
when we purchase these vehicles we maintain the vehicle we
supply the gas for the vehicle um so
so we start out at 40 but what is the outcome at the very
end there's a current car now the camry um
and I honestly I don't know in the history of haynes city
where the clerk has ever had a take-home vehicle um I think
her
siphon right now is 350 dollars um a month we just
confirmed it is 350. okay so that's I believe that it was
350
and um to me that's plenty um as far as gas on her own
vehicle um when you look at
reasons for the clerk as the commissioner was stated um the
city clerk is the least travel employee or
person rather because she's not employee um here um if
there's any type of disasters the city clerk
doesn't have to come out right um so during the most time
of her travel is during election which is once a
year going from here to the supervisor of the election
office in winter haven and possibly
will be moved to our toe later down the road a couple of
years from now but um i'm just not in favor
of the forty thousand dollar cost for a new car um if she
wants to
take the stipend off of the 350 and use the current car
that we have um i don't have a problem with that
but as far as purchasing a new vehicle um i would not be in
favor of a new vehicle for um for those multiple
reasons
i think she already uh vice mayor downey has already
answered the question um what years of camry i think
it's up to date um not saying again it's not a need um it's
just a want of course um and we definitely
want to make sure that all of our um staff members are
accommodated because they're putting in the work
but if they already have a car that's suitable um then also
not to get in the weeds of things i think
when like she said you've never seen a um a city clerk
having a take-home vehicle um but when you you get into the
weeds
of thing that goes back to me saying about fleet management
who does take cars home so when you're looking at who takes
cars home
why can't i take the car so they're looking at that as well
and seeing well what was their need to get
getting the car and taking a car but i agree with you on
that the car that they have now should be fine
especially we want to make sure we you know we have a
physical responsibility so that we're not spending
money that we don't need to spend but i don't see a problem
with her having the car she has for a take home
but again back to the weeds of things when you're seeing
other people it goes back to fleet management
to see a war taking cars home and i'm seeing that but i
want to take the car home too well commissioner
johnson i can tell you that i have raised that concern for
two years and i will say that some of the departments
have been back and took away vehicles from some of the
people that were just taking them home and it was
on the emergency need basis like for example if they were
on call on call of duty for that particular
week then they took their vehicle home if they were not
then they left here and they only drove the vehicle
during the hours that they were actually working and
providing the service so um there is a list and
maybe they can give all of us this updated list again of
all the vehicles and everyone that takes them home i
did receive that and um i did notice that some of the
changes in some departments were made with those take home
vehicles
and quickly mr mayor uh my last thought thank you you know
and and i don't have an issue if you're gonna if you
are a person that had that respond to being outside of
normal business out you know and and and you have
a car and then you go to that go directly to that site or
something going on but just for someone that has an
office job here and then you come to the office money you
're not gonna you're not on that uh just to be called
out for something that's gonna happen and it's a different
you know so and i don't and i've been here a
while i go back to 2016 and and you're right i don't recall
any of the prior city clerks having a uh
uh car you know i don't even know and i can't speak on i
don't know i don't even know that we even
paid them a site before a car we didn't i don't think we
even did that because they didn't need a car
so uh i'm okay with them using the current car that's a car
that's there you want to use that car
that's fine but i think that you know we already in a
question where we got to cut someplace and now we
added another 41 000 car and we may have to cut things so
so right now i don't think the city is in
you know that we should be getting an additional fleet car
but something we really don't need right now
and i just think that we've let them use a car even
different they didn't have a car there's a car that
it can be used already all right uh thank you for that so
is this an item uh from what i'm hearing is this an item uh
that we
leave
yes but are we going to leave her stipend in the end though
that's what i think it was either or i don't
think it was the takeaway that will be during the i guess
the renewal of the right correct
this would just be striking striking this request here all
right all right so yeah i think that
we also want to make sure that that we've let her know that
you see the car you don't have
but we're not going to approve an additional car right now
and just for clarity so if she's going to
use the vehicle that she has or take home do we take away
the sniping or does she
do that be a no they do the contract you have to take away
the sniping
you can take that car and we want you to yeah doing the
contract yeah
it wouldn't be all that man no no no that's what she was
asking that yeah if she elects to take the car
then will that remove the sniping and that answer would yes
yes you cannot have yeah yeah that would
be double dipping right you can't get your stipend and you
got a car exactly you can't do that
yeah i guess what i'm what i'm stating here
yeah
all right so the next department uh fleet maintenance and
so there's one request for a two post car lift
i'll let woodley come up in two posts
um
all right good afternoon um this is for um fleet
maintenance to be proposed for our two post
apartment right now um with our current situation um our
fleet department kind of outgrown
um their capacity so we're looking to get another post um
outdoors it will be currently underneath the
awning by our fuel station um that post will only be used
for smaller vehicles so vehicles that are the
size of a charger or a camry s so to speak that will be one
of those quick and get out kind of posts so
oil changes tire fill-ups and that'll be it so that's what
the two postcard will be used for
and it will be it will be outdoor but it'll be underneath
an awning so it will not be
subject to any sort of rain or sunlight or anything of sort
you know uh thank you for the thing i want to
uh
well the good thing about is that um for the future of
public works
eventually build out this post will be able to be reused
indoors as well it'll be the same quality of what
we currently have right now
uh are there any questions for this time no but if you
would have caught me a couple months ago
it gave you that tool
that's what she bought a call for you
no listen this my mom got rid of all my dad's equipment
yes but i'm in favor of it no problem i'm good i'll have it
perfect then i think the last department that we have going
back to page 13 is it
for me
uh
uh
uh
thank you
and this the backbone is essentially creating redundancy
for
for our different city campuses essentially it'll create a
second second ring so if a fiber
gets cut on one of our current ones this would just be back
up this is just part of it this would be the full ring
this is all over the city we will have it all over the city
so everybody would have a secondary connection just in case
of a fiber cut
let me ask you
is this something that will
do you foresee this with something that we're going to
carry over this is something that we can actually
the portions that we had planned out for this year i think
it could be done within this fiscal year
not the full ring though again
uh
anybody
anybody
i don't expect any questions
i'm back home
and this is capital
five how long would it take us to be uh for this bank more
is 500 000 as a capital project how many years
do you think that we'll take it
this will be a one-time project
depending on again the segment
we would expect for it to be paid within the next fiscal
year
oh really we wouldn't expect for it to
no that's not the question he's asking he's asking
this is a question that this only does one second how many
segments do we need to complete
the circle i mean one second i have the answer for that
that's an answer
is that for 500 000 right yeah how many segments and how
long is going to be looking at it
yeah but that's just that one yeah so you also said 27 28
29 30 31 so it's five years correct that is the plane rate
so the total capital project is not just five 500 000 that
is correct it's 25 it's two it was 250 um get my math right
now
two point yeah nobody likes math
but yes and this isn't an absolute necessity per se but
once it's one of them things that you know you
don't think you need until you need it no i understand i
just want to make sure that they
understand that this is not and they come back again
because you're saying if i read this
it's 500 that's not true it is more than five it's 500 per
year correct okay so we'll so it's
actually 2.5 million dollars over the next five years what
we're going to be a capital project
mr mayor correct me if i'm wrong on this jeremiah but um
eventually it create we would have two service
providers that would say i'm making it up frontier and at&t
and so if if we had a storm and the fiber got
cut on this end that was frontier then the other end the
other service provider could still provide it
and we actually do have that now what we're referring to
right now is the city internal fiber
oh from from building to building we have internet
connection over at the eoc now so if city hall goes
down we have to make a quick configuration change but eoc
internet would take over for the city
internet's a little slower but it's better than nothing so
but that's all i have a question on the next one for the uh
the fiber for the hang city trail
that's the one off the opposite drive we said that goes
over by ember park over there yeah and it goes
up to robinson and all by yeah and it would go around the
trail there over to the fire station
and we're going to run fiber over there why do we need
fiber there so part of the reason would be
part of a it's also part of the redundant loop for one it's
kind of just being added in but the other
option for that is for like areas that we might have issues
we can put wi-fi out there we can put
cameras out there if we need to just different equipment it
would have that capability to have it there
okay the same reason why people walk correct and it would
also provide a connection point for ember dog park
which right now is running off a cellular cradle point from
the camera out there so that would give me
a good one to cut yes if needed one quick question about
this so in running and i know right now
i would just kind of be there um if for you know some some
reason we have this structure
for the moment that would that give us a connection that
you need to so we wouldn't have to come back
that's correct if that connection is there we just have to
run from that connection to the new building
i'll yield back i don't have anything else
so
uh
i think that would be the best bet
yes sir
so where are we at now so this wraps up the general fund
again we've gone over all 34.5 million
dollars in requests between all departments for just the
general fund so at this point we can transition
we can go either storm water which only has 600 000 worth
of requests we can knock that one out pretty quick
and then end with utilities which has 47 million dollars or
you can go right into utilities with 47
and leave storm water for last you can kind of decide which
one you want to take yeah but here's my
question before we move on how much you said earlier that
this commission you know that we have
that we can have that we can spend in capital project so we
're recommending that you budget right
that we have to look at all those more than came before us
because i think we how much did we have
over eight million dollars in capital just we were at we
started at 34.5 million 34.5 and we only have
eight million yeah we got a long ways to go yes sir
are you going to come back up with something that's been
cut in the capital or you want you want this commission to
to say hey cut this out how do you want to do that it's at
the pleasure of the commission again we've done
it both ways in the past years we've done where we've come
back with proposals and recommendations
based on ranking last year the commission kind of went
through and cut from different departments so
we're open to whatever you guys would like to see i'd like
to see you come back for us and say i met with the
department really and say hey this is what they can live
without you know so i cut yes i cut that now we're
at you know now we now we're at 12 meals do you understand
what i'm saying because and i think that's
under the finance department you mean we're going to say
listen we got to get down to eight meals
what can you live and live without and then you come back
and i'm just fair and then you come back and
say hey i met with them and this is where we're at now if
you all want to go in and look at some other
stuff that you all want to cut much stuff and we get it we
got to get to the same meal we could do
that as well with um and again we haven't got there yet but
obviously the village is a conversation that
we need to discuss and review we did provide some options
there for you guys consider you want to go
up down keep it the same projections but we can definitely
give you guys a recommended proposal with options
so just so just so we have some some definitive uh i guess
answers towards um and i do agree with
commissioner uh west i think we we had the opportunity to
hear what's the most important
uh from there and we've asked those questions about you
know items to leave but um i think
you know being that you're fine um if you could come back
with something being that you know there may be
something that you know that you're proposing to cut that
we can say well hey we're
swapping this evening we swap things yeah absolutely yeah
it'll be an example with the uh public safety
complex they asked for 20 million man for five million out
of that you know right i'm just using that
example and say hey then next year we can add five more
million back it's just that you have to have
that conversation with them and bring it back up because
you got the balance you got to do it
all right so um with benny i think we should move to uh uh
uh
this is page six um again just kind of i'm going to walk
you through this main page and page six at the
the same time stormwater is a again dedicated enterprise
fund completely funded by non-avalorm
assessments this past year you guys worked with attorney
mark lawson to keep the fire assessment
the same which basically was a reduction in order to keep
the same amount of funding so for example this
year we made five million and it was projected to go to six
million the board the commission's decision
was to do whatever it took to make it five million again so
there was a reduction to keep that revenue the
same with stormwater assessments we didn't make any change
it's just naturally growing as a result of
more homes being built new construction so the prior
funding was somewhere around 980 000
this year non-alarm assessments is going up to one million
one hundred sixty five thousand